该用户名已被注册 2023-08-05

I have been with the editor for 40 days, is it normal?

yuuuuz 2023-08-03

Yes. Currently, it is still with the editor.

frame111 2023-08-01

07 Apr 2023 submitted
17 Apr 2023 under review
24 May 2023 major revision
04 July 2023 minor revision
31 July 2023 accept
Thank you to the editor-in-chief and reviewers for their extremely prompt response time!

飞 2023-07-30

Are you still with the editor? Mine has been for half a month.

Heisenberg42 2023-07-29

Hello, congratulations on successfully publishing your MSSP. May I ask what were the reviewers' opinions and how many questions were raised when your paper was first rejected? I also had a paper that was rejected and resubmitted.

ht J 2023-07-19

2023.7.17 submitted
2023.7.19 with editor
Hope for a good outcome.

yyy_cccc 2023-07-18

I wrote an email using ChatGPT, followed up, and now one of the two reviewers has completed their review.

小执 2023-07-09

How are you doing now? How did the battle go? Did you send the reminder letter?

chaos and bifurcation 2023-07-05

It seems to be around 10 days. During this time, apart from editing and pre-reviewing, we also need to find reviewers. Please don't be in a hurry.

科研图图 2023-07-05

May I ask how long does it take for "with editor" to be reviewed?

科研图图 2023-07-05

May I ask how long it will take to submit for review with the editor?

cyril713 2023-07-05

How to comment?

科研图图 2023-07-05

May I ask how long with the editor?

frame111 2023-07-04

What's the rush? You've only been with the editor for 2 days.

科研图图 2023-07-04

When did you submit the manuscript? It has been with the editor for 2 days.

frame111 2023-07-04

I want to ask everyone, how can I find out who is the editor in charge of my manuscript? I want to follow up on it but don't know whom to email.

chaos and bifurcation 2023-07-02

2023/02/19 submitted
2023/05/27 major revisions (reviewed by three referees)
2023/06/07 approved revisions
2023/07/02 accepted
The reviewing process was the fastest among all submissions. I hope MSSP continues to improve!

Very9 2023-07-01

It is normal to have more than 20 pages, and generally, manuscripts are not rejected solely because of their length.

we fe f 2023-06-30

Is there no minor repair after major repairs?

we fe f 2023-06-30

2023.4.27 with editor (编辑)
2023.6.10 major revision (2 reviewers; 1 major; 1 with only one comment)
2023.6.29 revised submitted
2023.6.30 with editor (编辑)

yyy_cccc 2023-06-28

Had a battle with the editor, and submitted it for review on the 45th day.

ning030 2023-06-26

It has been 50 days already, but he still hasn't reviewed it. I even sent an email after a month, but he also didn't reply.

ning030 2023-06-26

I submitted it on May 5th, and around May 15th, the editor was invited. However, afterwards, it has been "with editor" all the time. It has been about 50 days now, and I asked once around 30 days, but there was no reply...

wuhu- 2023-06-26

In English, the text translates to: "with editor for fifty days, recently it turned into 'Editor Invited'... has anyone encountered this kind of situation before -_-?"

leilei_lei 2023-06-22

Brother, have you submitted your manuscript for external review?

jinx的微笑 2023-06-22

Submitted in August last year, went through a major revision and a minor revision, and got accepted today.
Both reviewers in the first round requested major revisions and gave positive feedback.
When sent back for revisions, Reviewer 1 did not choose to review it again, so the editor reluctantly found other reviewers. One of them gave a few random reasons for rejection.
In June, I followed up with a sense of being rejected, but the editor gave me minor revisions and asked me to carefully address the reviewer's questions.
I provided various references, literature, and theoretical comparisons to refute the reviewer's unreasonable reasons for rejection, and submitted it.
Two days later, the editor directly accepted it. The lesson learned is that if you have innovation, don't be intimidated by reviewers. Have confidence in appealing and editors have insightful judgment.

Tracy_Harden 2023-06-21

Based on my experience, urging doesn't have much effect, we can only wait. Urging may speed up the editing process, and the editor may invite new reviewers because this journal requires all reviewers to give an acceptance decision before accepting, even if it's a minor revision, it will still be sent for review again.

Tracy_Harden 2023-06-19

The reviewer's frequent unavailability... It's really annoying.

Tracy_Harden 2023-06-19

At the end of August 2022, submission;
At the end of February 2023, major revision, with more than 100 comments from reviewers;
At the end of March 2023, revise and resubmit;
In mid-June 2023, minor revision, only a few formatting issues;
Two days later, revised again, unexpectedly the editor sent it for review again;
I hope it won't be another long wait...

Yamy芽芽 2023-06-15

It has been one month now under review. How long will it approximately take for the result?