认证评论 - MATERIALS LETTERS
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

拒绝者 2021-11-22

Have you submitted before? Is this journal good or not?

独家记忆 2021-11-22

Recently, I submitted a paper to Materials Letters, and the system requires the mandatory linking of the corresponding author's ORCID. However, I am unable to link it no matter what I do. I would like to ask everyone how they resolved this issue.

拒绝者 2021-11-21

It might take at least half a month without estimation. What if the editor rejects it?

hshshd 2021-11-21

Has your article been submitted for review? Mine has been with the editor for a week, and it still hasn't been submitted for review...

拒绝者 2021-11-20

The text you provided is already in English. "11.16 submit" and "11.18 with editor" don't require translation as they are already in the requested language.

hshshd 2021-11-10

[060910] Published Time: 2021-11-09 08:43:55
The first item for submission to this journal is to select "short communication" and then link ORCID. Is this necessary? Why can't it pass? Have you resolved it? I also encountered this problem, and it keeps redirecting to the first option.

060910 2021-11-09

The first submission item for this journal is to select "short communication" and then link ORCID. Is this mandatory? Why am I unable to pass it?

冲2区 2021-11-04

May I ask how long it takes to get the result after the next trial, thank you.

科研人员msc 2021-11-03

Keep going, believe in editing.

lllili 2021-10-15

August 15, 2021, submitted
August 16, 2021, formatting revised
August 17, 2021, article assigned an identification number
August 22, 2121, under review

lllili 2021-10-15

Write a reminder letter on September 15, 2021.

carrier徐小幺 2021-10-14

I have already written the third reminder letter. It has been a full five months since the submission, but there is still no result from the initial review. I chose the journal for its quick publication speed and careful consideration when I submitted it.

carrier徐小幺 2021-10-07

September 16th - Writing a reminder letter
October 7th - Under review

lllili 2021-10-04

On October 3, 2020, the "under review" status has been updated again.

lllili 2021-09-30

On September 19, 2021, the "under review" status was updated again.

bluesss 2021-09-16

I'm very curious as to why you think the innovative point you mentioned is so good, if it's really that good, why not invest in it? (Shedding tears of envy so quickly)

lllili 2021-09-13

September 4, 2021, the under review date has been updated.

lllili 2021-09-13

So fast, the article was accepted without being reviewed by the editor?

meercy 2021-09-11

I am also this editor, very efficient, it takes less than 2 weeks from submission to acceptance. Personally, I feel that the editor himself may be an expert in this field. After reading your paper, I think the innovation is very good. It just needs further discussion to be published, so it wasn't sent for review?

lllili 2021-09-03

August 15, 2021, submission
August 16, 2021, formatting revision
August 17, 2021, article assigned a number
August 22, 2121, Under Review

催化流星 2021-08-26

Received 20 May 2021;
Received in revised form 15 July 2021;
Accepted 5 August 2021

The upgraded version of the journal has dropped from Zone 2 to Zone 3. I have reviewed several articles from this journal before and found the quality to be average, so it is not surprising that it dropped.

Our manuscript is about inorganic photocatalysts. The handling speed of the editor is acceptable, and the comments from the three reviewers are not many, totaling less than 20 points. It requires minor revisions. After receiving the reviewer's comments, we took a week to make the revisions and added two additional characterization tests. It took about 20 days to complete the revisions before it was accepted. I thought more revisions would be needed.

interface b s 2021-08-25

Hello, host. I would like to ask, does this journal require plagiarism check?

interface b s 2021-08-25

Hello, host, I would like to ask if this journal needs to be checked for plagiarism.

man123 2021-08-25

The first ML is very fast, and the editing is very responsible. Submit on 8.12, modify the format on 8.13, moderate revision on 8.15, resubmit on 8.19, modify the format and submit on 8.20, modify the format and submit on 8.23, and accept on 8.24. It took less than two weeks. Thanks to the editor Boris Borisovich Straumal. I wish everyone success soon too!

真的猫咪 2021-08-12

This article is mainly about the innovation point being particularly good, and it is quite surprising that it has been received so quickly.

真的猫咪 2021-08-12

July 25th submitted
July 29th with editor
July 30th under review
August 1st moderate revise
August 9th with editor
August 10th fix formatting issues
August 11th accepted

carrier徐小幺 2021-08-08

In English, the translated text will be:

"August 8 is under review. When I wrote a reminder letter, I was only informed that it is currently under review, without any further explanation. In normal communication, it wouldn't be rejected."

moling 2021-08-05

Hello, does writing a reminder letter have any effect? Will it be directly rejected?

Boss King 2021-07-31

Unable to find a reviewer, rejected.

carrier徐小幺 2021-07-27

May 16 - Submission
May 17 - Formatting revision
May 18 - With editor
May 22 - Under review
July 16 - Writing a reminder letter
July 24 - Under review

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started