认证评论 - MATERIALS LETTERS
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

鼓楼区书记 2022-03-22

Choose short communication.

爱科研的boy 2022-03-22

2022.3.15 submitted to the journal
2022.3.18 returned to add contact phone number
2022.3.18 resubmitted
2022.3.21 with editor

过半 2022-03-21

Hello, OP.
When I submitted today, I found that this journal only allows submission of short communications and a few other options. Other types are marked as "do not submit a new submission." May I ask what type of article you submitted?

鼓楼区书记 2022-03-20

2022.3.2 Submit
2022.3.4 With editor
2022.3.5 Under review
2022.3.9 Moderate revision (one issue)
2022.3.14 Resubmit
2022.3.15 Format change
2022.3.16 Resubmit
2022.3.18 Completed accept
The entire process from submission to acceptance took a total of 17 days. The response was intentionally delayed for a few days, otherwise it could have been faster!

灰灰晖 2022-03-17

The magazine is now very impressive, with four reviewers who provided some comments and questions. In general, there were three minor revisions and one major revision, but then the editor rejected it. Just two words, haha, are they bullying our domestic graphene research team?

小白白 2022-03-09

The review process was fast, and the editor was also very responsible. During the revision period, I was in constant contact with the editor through email due to keyword restrictions. They were very patient and responsible. I caused some delays due to my own reasons, but overall, it was very good. It was my first SCI submission, and the experience was excellent.

21.12.20 Submission
21.12.27 Under review
22.01.03 Moderate review
22.02.02 Revision
22.02.26 After making further modifications due to keyword issues, resubmitted
22.03.08 Accepted

ulightm 2022-03-09

The editor is especially responsible, and some reviewers are very professional. The review speed is quite fast, and we hope it will continue to improve.
January 4, 2022: Submission
January 7, 2022: Re-submission after formatting modification
January 28, 2022: First review completed, major revisions
February 25, 2022: Revised
March 9, 2022: Accepted

小熊猫. 2022-03-07

When submitting, I couldn't connect to ORCID. After entering the email password in the last step, it flashed back to the original webpage. Has anyone encountered a similar issue before? How can it be resolved?

王杨杨 2022-03-02

2022/03/01: Submitted to Journal. Hope everything goes smoothly!

独家记忆 2022-02-18

2022/02/17 accept, it took a full 2 months from submission to acceptance, which is considered relatively fast.

独家记忆 2022-02-08

2022/02/01 moderate revision Only one reviewer raised a minor issue, which should not be a big problem.
2022/02/08 resubmission hoping for a prompt acceptance.

guyue 2022-01-26

2021.5.01 submit manuscript - Submitted manuscript on May 1, 2021
2021.5.04 submit manuscript - Submitted manuscript on May 4, 2021
2021.5.08 Under review - Under review since May 8, 2021
2021.7.22 moderate revision - Requested moderate revision on July 22, 2021
2021.7.28 Submit revision - Submitted revision on July 28, 2021
2021.7.28 with editor - Under editor's consideration since July 28, 2021
2021.8.07 under review - Under review since August 7, 2021
2021.10.16 Accepted - Accepted on October 16, 2021

buaa刘炳森 2022-01-26

2021.12.24 Submission
2021.12.25 Format modified, double line spacing, reference format also requires double line spacing
2021.12.25 Re-submission
2021.12.29 Under review
2022.01.07 Moderate revision, two reviewers, few issues
2022.01.09 Revision requested (editor asked for line numbers)
2022.01.10 Format modified, no line numbers allowed, revised on the same day
2022.01.18 The first reviewer may intentionally pick on the hardness value, suspecting it is too high
2022.01.19 Experimental data supplemented, provided data evidence, and found data values from other papers as supporting evidence, revision requested
2022.01.19 Accepted by the editor on the same day.
Thanks to Editor Zheng Yufeng for the prompt handling! Hope Letters will continue to improve!

JinHong G 2022-01-24

January 23, modified format and submitted.
The format has been modified several times, afraid it might leave a bad impression on the editor. Hopefully, it will be reviewed soon!

JinHong G 2022-01-17

January 17th, return to modify the format
January 17th, format modification submitted.

JinHong G 2022-01-16

Submit the journal on January 15th.

卡脖子技术 2022-01-09

2021年:
11.7 submit
11.9 with editor
11.15 under review
12.2 minor revisions
12.7 revised with editor
12.9 under review
2022年:
1.9 completed and accepted

独家记忆 2022-01-07

2022/01/07 reject, 1st review cycle took 40 days with two reviewers. One rejected the submission while the other suggested major revisions. The comments provided were very reasonable, indicating that the article indeed had many issues and would require careful revision before resubmission.

独家记忆 2022-01-07

2022/01/07 reject, 1st review cycle of 40 days, two reviewers, one reject, one major revision. The comments provided were very constructive, and indeed, the article has many issues.

灰灰QAQ 2022-01-07

School of Electrical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, finally obtained my first-authored SCI paper before graduating from the third year of my master's program.

2021:
09.15 Submitted
09.17 With Editor
09.20 With Editor (date changed, status unchanged)
09.25 Under Review
10.03 Under Review (date changed, status unchanged)
10.28 Minor Revision
11.25 Revised with editor (due to personal busyness, replied late)
11.26 Modified highlights (exceeded character limit)
11.27 With Editor
12.04 Completed Accept
12.10 Online

It seems that in this journal, "Minor Revision" is equivalent to "Moderate Revision" (which means the paper is accepted after minor revisions). The editor's letter states, "Given that the requested revisions are moderate, the new version is required within Nov 26, 2021." Some people say "moderate" means minor revisions, while others say it means moderate revisions.

xtrnn 2022-01-04

1 reviewer
2020.8.12 submitted
2020.8.17 with editor
2020.8.19 under review
2020.8.22 under editor evaluation
2020.8.31 moderately revised
2020.9.5 revision submitted
2020.9.5 with editor
2020.9.9 required reviews completed
2020.9.10 accepted

zhuozipl 2021-12-29

2021/09/14 Submission
2021/10/01 Under review
2021/10/13 First revision - One month given for revisions. Three reviewers. The second reviewer's comments were not positive, but still gave me a chance to revise. I made serious revisions and conducted additional experiments.
2021/11/05 Response
2021/11/18 Second revision - The second reviewer's comments became positive, and I continued to respond.
2021/12/08 Third revision - This time was quite amusing. The first reviewer saw the second reviewer's questions and started asking questions again==
2021/12/28 Acceptance
Overall, it took nearly four months, which is an acceptable speed. The reviewers I encountered were very diligent, and although there were obstacles, the paper was eventually accepted.

独家记忆 2021-12-24

2021/12/23 under review: This means that something is currently being reviewed or evaluated on December 23, 2021.

独家记忆 2021-12-23

Coating corrosion direction
Submitted on 2021/12/17, requested format modification one day later
Resubmitted on 2021/12/20 after format modification, currently with editor

独家记忆 2021-12-22

I have never submitted before, but based on the assigned article number, it seems that this journal receives quite a large number of submissions. The quality of the articles on it is average, so it feels like only those with some level of innovation can be considered good. The previous email account could not be linked, so I registered a new email account and linked it to ORCID for submission.

独家记忆 2021-12-22

Research direction of thermal diffusion of metal coatings on alloy surfaces.
Submitted on November 24, 2021, with editing requirements for modifying keywords (including at least 2 keywords specified in the guide for authors), adding page numbers, double line spacing, and providing 3 classification fields, etc., and requested for resubmission.
Resubmitted on November 27, 2021, currently under review.
No review comments have been received so far.

小cheng 2021-12-12

4.18 Submission
10.24 Revision
11.18 Return for Revision
12.4 Acceptance
The comments given by the reviewers are very fair, and the editors are also very good. You all can give it a try.

拒绝者 2021-12-03

11.26 under review - This means that something is currently being examined or evaluated and a decision or judgment has not been made yet on November 26th.
12.2 under review - This means that something is currently being examined or evaluated and a decision or judgment has not been made yet on December 2nd.

lllili 2021-11-30

Returned the reviewer's comments on October 3rd, and requested revisions before October 30th. Submitted the revised manuscript on October 28th, and it has been showing "with editor" since then.

carrier徐小幺 2021-11-24

The initial review comments for November 20th have been received, and on November 16th, the fourth reminder letter was sent. After considering the possibility of rejection, a second accurate response was given. The initial review process lasted for six months and four days. Please be cautious when submitting manuscripts!

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now