ZZ123999 2023-04-04

Same question, does "decision in process" mean instant rejection? How can I withdraw my submission?

wenan 2023-03-27

My review article was submitted and the status bar showed "Decision in Process" on the same day. It has been three days since then, does it mean that it has been rejected?

ZZ123999 2023-03-23

May I ask if you accept articles on the extraction of traditional Chinese medicine?

小木余 2023-03-18

Provide at least three sets of original data. Now we require the entire manuscript. Specific details are already mentioned in the submission guidelines on the official website.

Darren_dq 2023-03-01

Is the WB raw data repeated three times? Are there any requirements for the film? Thank you.

米米松 2023-02-28

Posted for 40 days, gave minor suggestions, with a 20-day cycle, when returning, all original data of WB must be submitted, and the second review was accepted in less than 10 days.

太白真猪 2023-02-07

The speed is very fast. They will come back with feedback in just one month. The publishing speed is also very fast. It's very good!

frank 2022-08-05

You only know whether a journal is good or not after publishing in it. I think the editors and reviewers are very professional. I was given 20 days for minor revisions, and it was accepted 8 days after the revisions. I think it's a really good journal, and the review process is also fast. Everyone should give it a try.

Cadmium 2022-05-19

The journal is prompt, and it took one month from submission to the first round of revisions. There were three reviewers, and although there were many questions, they were still reasonable, with some suggestions for modifications and others for rebuttals. It took about a week to revise and send back the response, with two of the reviewers accepting the changes and one requesting language revisions. After polishing the language, it was accepted after three days! The whole process took two months. After acceptance, there is a three-day period for proofreading.

chen 2022-04-05

There is a reason for the warning, because the magazine is really garbage.

chen 2022-04-04

Garbage magazine. Despite the agreement of external review experts to accept it, the editor rejected my submission with a brilliant reason, stating that the content of the article does not align with the manuscript scope of the magazine. If it doesn't meet the submission criteria, why did they send it for review in the first place? Moreover, after rejecting it, they even posted my article on the SSRN tool website. Truly a garbage magazine.

longda 2022-03-01

Well-deserved reputation, 40 days from investment to delivery.

chinesebio 2022-01-19

Last year it was on the warning list, but this year it's not. Has the magazine's quality improved? Definitely not, this warning list is simply nonsense and has no reference value at all.

peasgarlic 2021-07-09

The warning is due to the discovery that some articles in the journal have been found to have repeated use of images.

Zynamn 2021-06-24

It is estimated that there are more submissions from Chinese people. Anyway, those in the Chinese Academy of Sciences are determined to increase the difficulty of submissions for young scholars and students from lower-tier non-prestigious universities. They suppress journals that are slightly more friendly towards these young scholars and students from lower-tier non-prestigious universities. Science citation index evaluation criteria by Clarivate Analytics have their own standards and are not influenced by personal emotions. The Chinese Academy of Sciences themselves have stated that the evaluation of these warning journals is a combination of qualitative and quantitative measures, and how they are qualified is determined by them.

最少五个字 2021-05-15

Submitted on 11/31/2020, revised on 1/30/2021 based on suggestions from two reviewers who were both very nice and professional. The deadline for revision was set for 3/15, but since there were no major issues, it was revised by 2/15. It was accepted on 2/17 and went online on 2/21. The process was fast and the review was rigorous. It was a very nice submission that ensured graduation~

sunny1973 2021-02-24

I learned about this magazine from my colleagues. A few years ago, it felt relatively mediocre. My colleagues only submitted to this magazine after being rejected by other magazines. However, the submission experience last year felt very different. The magazine's peer review process was more professional, and the suggestions provided were very helpful. After three rounds of revisions and additional data, it was finally accepted. I feel that this magazine is becoming more and more formal now. It's better this way.

liujialu 2021-01-20

After three months, it was finally accepted, and no page fees were required. I hope more top magazines in China will also appear without page fees. I really don't understand how the warning list of the Chinese Academy of Sciences is calculated. Isn't it a predatory magazine to use limited research funding to pay for page fees? How many magazines in China do not require page fees? Academic research should encourage a diversity of opinions and respect the author's choice. What does it mean to issue a "warning" and claim it is not about the price of the paper? Please consider the factor of free publication in the Chinese Academy of Sciences. That is the key. Can domestic journals achieve this?