罗本 2022-11-08

The translated text is as follows:

"The revised article was reviewed quite quickly by two reviewers, taking 3 days. It was then with the deputy editor for 4 days. Today, it is with the editor, and the status changed from 'awaiting EIC immediate decision' to 'Awaiting EIC Decision'. What does this mean?"

大西瓜123 2022-10-27

It has been over three months since the second trial.

小城市 2022-10-27

Meitao should upgrade to a new version in the first district.

大西瓜123 2022-09-20

Just put it in one word, there are not so many requirements for the first submission.

cqustcg 2022-09-20

Thank you. Should I upload each image one by one or put them in a single Word document and convert it to PDF? Thank you.

大西瓜123 2022-09-20

Don't worry, just upload the picture in a separate file.

cqustcg 2022-09-20

May I ask, what is the "link text" when uploading an image in the submission system? Thank you.

大西瓜123 2022-09-10

2022.4.26: Submitted
2022.5.25: Major revision
2022.7.20: Resubmitted
2022.7.25: Awaiting reviewer scores
2022.8.16: Awaiting AE assignment
2022.8.16: Awaiting reviewer scores (until now)

It seems to be a timeline of the submission and review process for a document or manuscript. The text indicates that it was initially submitted on April 26, 2022, then underwent major revisions on May 25, 2022. It was resubmitted on July 20, 2022, and since then, it has been awaiting reviewer scores and AE (Associate Editor) assignment.

Wang Z Y 2022-09-10

2022.04.20: submitted
2022.04.27: rejected (language refinement)
2022.05.04: resubmitted
2022.05.23: rejected
2022.05.25: appeal (reviewer misunderstanding)
2022.05.27: resubmitted
2022.07.06: major revision
2022.07.27: resubmitted
2022.09.10: accept
Special thanks to the editor-in-chief and reviewers for their mercy!!!

大西瓜123 2022-08-31

After more than a month of major repairs, there was an occurrence of "Awaiting Reviewer Scores," which then changed to "awaiting ae assignment," and then changed back to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores." What is the situation?

mybj 2022-07-11

It has been two weeks since submission, and the editor has not been assigned yet. This is too slow.

尹弼君 2022-07-07

Received April 2022
Revised June 2022
Accepted June 2022

I feel that both the journal's editor-in-chief and the responsible editor are quite responsible. The questions they raised are also very professional and targeted. They do not nitpick on insignificant details. At least, I don't think the reviewers for this journal are mindless trolls who don't know anything and keep focusing on irrelevant points. I think they are pretty good, after all, it's a century-old journal.

小李乐哈哈 2022-06-15

I want to ask if Meitao requires money? Do I need to pay the layout fee? Can I choose whether it is OA?

黑大帅 2022-05-17

2022.03.18 submitted; Awaiting ADM - Submitted on March 18, 2022; Waiting for ADM (Assistant Decision Maker)
2022.03.24 Under review - Currently being reviewed
2022.03.26 Awaiting Reviewer Scores - Waiting for scores/comments from reviewers
2022.04.30 Awaiting AE Assignment - Waiting for assignment to Associate Editor
2022.05.02 major revision - Requires major revisions
2022.05.11 revision submitted - Revised version submitted
2022.05.15 Awaiting Reviewer Scores - Waiting for scores/comments from reviewers
2022.05.16 Awaiting AE Assignment - Waiting for assignment to Associate Editor
2022.05.17 Accept - Accepted

QRR1984 2022-01-10

JACS plays the role of a spam sender in my case. It frequently sends recommended articles to my mailbox. I delete them without even looking at them. These articles are of no help to our industrial projects, and reading them is simply a waste of time. The misleading direction of domestic scientific research by the Journal of the American Chemical Society has been going on for quite some time, but it doesn't affect me. I focus on the core of my project.

zhou 2021-10-04

Because Mei Tao is not an Elsevier journal, the impact factor grows slowly.

peter.pan 2021-09-24

May I ask, is "awaiting eic immediate decision, under review" the same as being under review?

淡墨青衫 2021-09-20

July 14 submit,
August 15 minor revision,
August 17 resubmit,
September 09 minor revision,
September 09 resubmit,
September 12 minor revision,
September 12 resubmit,
September 14 accept.

First time encountering three rounds of minor revisions. In the first round, there were two reviewers, and only one minor revision was required. The assistant editor provided some suggestions, and after making the revisions, the manuscript was resubmitted. In the second round, both reviewers approved it, but the assistant editor provided a bunch of suggestions. After spending four hours making the changes, it turned out that the assistant editor didn't even look at it and copied and pasted the original issues again. The editor requested another round of minor revisions. There was no choice but to resubmit it again. Fortunately, it was accepted two days later and managed to meet the scholarship deadline.

没事看文章 2021-07-02

The editor has focused more on the functional direction, right? Structural ceramics are even worse now, and in this aspect, they are not as good as European ceramics.

Winston 2021-07-01

Discussion Comments: Why has Meitao now become the latter among the three major ceramics (Ou Tao has reached 5, Guo Tao has reached 4, Meitao is still at 3...)? I remember that Meitao used to be awesome.

JJ 2021-06-16

What is the result?

扑克脸123 2021-06-09

Hello, may I ask if your situation has changed? Mine has been like this for several days, I don't dare to rush.

咸鱼渴求翻身 2021-05-29

4.28 awaiting reviewer scores
Until now, it has been 1 month since 5.29 and the status has not changed. Is this normal?

咸鱼渴求翻身 2021-04-22

4.20 submitted
4.21 awaiting EIC (Editor-in-Chief) immediate decision - under review
4.21 awaiting EIC immediate decision - awaiting reviewer assignment

黑大侠 2021-03-17

It has been a week since I submitted it, and it has been consistently showing "Awaiting Admin Checklist". What is this situation? Does anyone know?

我想飞 2021-03-13

July 20, Posting
October 20, Major revision, many issues, supplemented with experimental data
November 20, Return to the second edition
March 21, Minor revision, some words replaced
March 21, Return to the third edition, received on the same day!

lllllx 2021-03-06

2021/3/6 Immediate accept

nature-publisher 2021-03-05

2021.02.02 Post
2021.02.17 Received reviewer comments, all three reviewers provided minor revision suggestions.
2021.03.03 Revised manuscript sent back.
2021.03.04 Accepted.
Thank you, editor, for the extremely fast handling speed.

lllllx 2021-03-03

2021/3/3 esperando la decisión del EIC

Translation: 2021/3/3 awaiting EIC decision

lllllx 2021-02-27

2020/12/19, Submission
The reviewer spent about two weeks reviewing.
2021/1/25, Received comments from two reviewers. The first person said that the testing, theoretical explanation, and previous journal articles did not differ much, and suggested re-editing the article. They raised 15 questions. The second reviewer showed interest in the article and raised 10 questions. The questions were all concise and to the point. They provided many professional comments and suggestions.
2021/2/4, Submitted after making revisions. In order to avoid doubts from the first reviewer, some characterization tests were specifically added.
2021/2/24, The reviewer said that there were significant changes to the article, so a new review was conducted, and 10 additional minor questions were raised.
2021/2/26, Submitted
2021/2/27, Waiting for AE assignment