Linger123 2023-05-05

The paper went through the steps of rejection, major revision, minor revision, and finally acceptance.
It was initially submitted to JPCL on December 14, 2022. On December 23, the editor rejected it and suggested submitting to JPCC.
The formatting was modified to match the style of "Journal of Physical Chemistry C."
It was resubmitted on January 6, coinciding with the Lunar New Year. Due to the holiday and the COVID-19 pandemic, it took about 2 months for the reviewers to provide feedback.
On March 6, the reviewers' comments were received. The first reviewer suggested minor revisions, while the second reviewer suggested major revisions, which the editor agreed with.
The revised manuscript was submitted on March 29.
On May 2, the reviewer's comments for minor revisions came back.
On the morning of May 4, it was submitted again and accepted on the same day.

Cliff-y 2023-04-09

2023.2.13 Submission
2.15 Review
3.16 Received minor revisions in the review comments
3.22 Submitted revised manuscript
3.30 (Deadline for returning the revised manuscript)
4.5 Accepted

Cliff-y 2023-04-09

4.5号accept translates to "Accept on the 4.5th."

驰驰123 2023-03-27

How long has it been since the review comments came back?

驰驰123 2023-03-27

How long does it take to reply to the review comments?

Cliff-y 2023-03-22

Reviewed for one month on 16th March 2023, with comments from two reviewers. They provided minor revisions and requested the revised manuscript to be returned before the 30th.

fghkjjlk 2023-03-17

Hello, may I ask which stage the article is currently in?

Cliff-y 2023-03-07

How long does the first trial take? It feels like waiting indefinitely.

LongY 2023-03-02

According to mjkIII, the journals and magazines in Zone 3 are all bad, while the ones in Zone 1 and 2 are good. It's scary.

Cliff-y 2023-02-25

The text translates to: "Assigned for editing on the same day; submitted for review 3 days later; currently under review as of 2023.02.25."

zhou,weei 2023-02-20

It has been a month since the minor revision was submitted, and there is no news.

凌锋 2023-02-19

Is JPCC now being despised like this in the country? ?

mjkIII 2023-02-18

If you can't do it yourself, then don't seek a sense of existence here. A true good journal would not stoop to the level of the third zone.

mjkIII 2023-02-18

If you can't make it on your own, then don't seek a sense of existence here. Truly excellent journals will not stoop down to the third zone.

mjkIII 2023-02-18

So-so, just an ordinary third-tier journal.

zhou,weei 2023-02-10

Revised on January 25th, it has been 15 days and still no news.

Mo12301 2022-12-21

Outrageous, PCCP is still a top-tier district, but JPCC has become a non-top-tier in the third district? When did JPCC become worse than even PCCP?

liwei001 2022-09-04

May 31st, submission
June 20th, feedback from reviewers, minor revisions from both reviewers
June 29th, revised
July 12th, formatting modifications
July 13th, officially accepted
July 20th, proofreading
July 22nd, online publication
August 4th, officially published
Overall speed is very fast, recommended!

趣多多00 2022-08-02

May I ask if there is a layout fee charged?

minluck 2022-07-21

5.17 Submission
6.22 Revision request
7.8 Resubmission
7.12 Accepted

曙光 2022-05-03

What is the reason for not receiving an email after submitting to JPCC?

小城市 2022-03-20

"Diaozhou is in the decline district because there are too many articles about collecting a bunch of nanoscale energy."

小城市 2022-03-09

jpcc has become the third district. All domestic journals have become the first district.

keyan 2022-02-08

In the past few years, JPCC has been declining significantly, which is really unfortunate! Previously, there used to be an article every year, but for the past two years, they were not even submitted for review. Later on, they got accepted in very good 1st tier journals. It feels like the editors have changed, and their taste has also changed. They are now more concerned about whether it fits the current hot topics. Previously, JPCC had a very deep theoretical level, but I don't know how it is now.

不会游泳的小菜鸡 2022-02-07

JPCC is very classic and professional. It truly deserves to be an industry classic. The editor-in-chief is an industry leader, very serious and responsible. I am increasingly unable to understand the division of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

总之我最帅- - 2021-12-24

The Chinese Academy of Sciences' divisional system is often not recognized by itself. I don't know what they are doing, it's like gambling to submit a journal. It's uncertain when one's own journal will be downgraded for no reason, or forcibly upgraded. The Chinese Academy of Sciences is confused.

burstlink 2021-12-21

Although it is a journal that still has some influence in the field of materialization, it has directly dropped to a third-tier ranking. All I can say is, I don't understand the classification system of the Chinese Academy of Sciences anymore.

今晚吃鸡 2021-12-21

8.13 Submission
10.18 First-round review comments received
11.17 Submitting revised comments
11.20 Acceptance
11.28 Apply for transfer to JPCC
12.16 Proofreading
12.20 Publication

你好老弟 2021-11-17

Which one has a higher recognition, PCCP or JPCC? 1. Both have a nice speed of reviewing and professionalism. 2. Both are well-established journals in physical chemistry. 3. They are benchmark journals for RSC and ACS. 4. Currently, both are top journals in the 2nd zone of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

ande 2021-10-17

Is the submission in single column or double column?