nur 2023-03-04

Submitted an article on 2023-3-4, knowing that this journal has a ridiculously slow speed, but still wishing myself good luck in getting one published!

V米兰小铁匠 2022-12-01

Provide my review cycle record for everyone's reference:
2022.04.02 - Submitted
2022.04.13 - With editor
2022.04.26 - Under review
2022.07.16 - Decision in process
2022.07.28 - Review comments received
2022.10.04 - Submitted revised manuscript
2022.10.14 - With editor
2022.10.29 - Decision in process
2022.11.20 - Accepted

Hope our research journey goes smoothly!

随风飞 2022-07-30

The overall process was slow, not suitable for students who were in a hurry to graduate. However, luckily, the article was eventually accepted.
Submitted on October 17th;
Received first review comments on February 25th, requiring major revisions;
Uploaded revised manuscript in mid-March; received a reminder after two months;
Received review comments on June 16th, requiring minor revisions;
Uploaded revised manuscript on June 25th;
Accepted on July 27th.

随风飞 2022-07-26

It has been a month since the submission of the minor revision paper on June 25th, and I am feeling restless. Can it be done faster?

固执的鱼 2022-06-16

The submission process is not enjoyable. Firstly, it is slow. It takes about a month to send it for external review, and with the first review taking two months, the total time is three months. Throughout the process, there is only one reviewer. The reviewer is indeed professional, but it can be seen that they are not thorough. They can only provide suggestions on parts they are familiar with, and these parts are not the most important content of the article (for example, they focus on the part that cost 10,000 yuan for experiments, while ignoring the remaining 24,000 yuan of experimental data). This shows that the reviewer may not understand what the article is about, resulting in negative evaluations. Shouldn't they be objective if they do not understand? Secondly, the reviewer is not thorough and only reviews the parts related to the figures and their related sections. They completely ignore the content without figures. Lastly, the reviewer makes several mocking remarks in the article, for example, "I'm just curious if you are serious." It's truly eye-opening. In conclusion, if you are in a hurry to graduate, do not choose this journal.

随风飞 2022-05-26

My article is undergoing the second review by the editor at the end of February. I have urged for the manuscript in mid-May, and currently, it is under review. I don't know when the results will be released. This journal is really lengthy. I'm anxious to graduate, so I hope it will be faster and smoother.

随风飞 2022-04-01

After I made modifications, the status has always been "with editor".

固执的鱼 2022-03-31

How come I have been submitting for three days and still haven't received any news or a paper number?

随风飞 2022-03-22

I submitted the revised version at the end of February, but it is still in the "with editor" status. The speed is indeed a bit slow.

Jimtaw 2022-02-12

Please provide context for the phrase "补充一下后续" in order to accurately translate it.

随风飞 2022-01-26

The editorial system has shown "decision in process" since January 5th. It has been 20 days now, and the current status has not changed. Hopefully, there will be a positive outcome.

Professor Zhou 2021-12-03

Submitted on June 20th, it is now December 3rd and still under review. This journal is too slow; it has been with the editor for over a month. It has been almost 5 months of review and still no result...

随风飞 2021-11-14

The delivery was made during the National Day, and it is still in the "with Editor" status. The reviewing speed is really...

Jimtaw 2021-05-19

The result of the submission is unknown. The associate editor is very responsible and requested to revise the formatting before resubmitting.

找金子 2021-01-27

Hello, how long have you been with the editor? It's been a month for me.