认证评论 - JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

oceanair 2023-05-15

When can CD be compared to JC? CD being able to enter the second district while JAS is already a joke in the third district. Now CD has turned into something domestic, absolutely don't compare CD to JC, JAS, JGRA, MWR, and so on.

果儿小亲亲 2023-01-24

After submitting for more than half a month, it finally went for review. I don't know what the outcome will be. Wishing you well, wishing you well, wishing you well. New year, new atmosphere.

xwzj 2023-01-12

JC is classified as Zone 2, and the classification of the Chinese Academy of Sciences is really outrageous!

一刀倾城 2023-01-07

Both the JC and CD in the meteorological category are in the second tier. The classification system of the Chinese Academy of Sciences has completely become a shit.

一刀倾城 2023-01-07

Congratulations to JC for winning the second district, and congratulations to AR for winning the first district. Although AR is not worthy of shining JC's shoes, the classification of the Chinese Academy of Sciences is just that domineering.

Enlighten_qm 2023-01-06

District 2? What is the level of this journal?

GRL 2022-12-22

Old industry leading magazine, unexpectedly ranked in the top of the second district.

LiPR 2021-11-29

The top publication in the field of climate change, highly regarded within the industry, is known for its high publishing difficulty.

香香 2021-10-13

The second submission to J. Climate involved three reviewers. The first reviewer took a month and a half to provide feedback, suggesting minor revisions or rejection. The second reviewer rejected the submission outright. The editor ultimately decided to reject the manuscript. We were not satisfied with this outcome and diligently addressed and responded to the reviewers' comments. After making revisions for two months, we resubmitted the paper with a bold face, but this time with a new editor. However, the new editor still sent the manuscript and our response back to the previous three reviewers. Two of them recommended acceptance directly, and one suggested minor revisions. After making the revisions and resubmitting within a week, the paper was accepted one month later. Overall, the quality of J. Climate is good, and the review process is fast and professional.

who are you 2021-09-25

The magazine has a very good reputation. I was lucky to get accepted on my first submission, but it also took nearly a year. The reviewers were very professional and asked challenging and detailed questions. They even provided feedback on the revisions we made. In my opinion, JC, ACP, and JGR are the three leading journals in the atmospheric field.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now