islander 2023-07-11

According to their own statement, this journal's distinguishing feature is that if there is a desk rejection, it will be very direct, but once it enters the review process, it will be relatively gentle. It feels easier than imagined. Previously submitted journals, except for the overall environment, were all returned because they were not suitable in scope. Personally, I feel that this journal is still worth a try.

芳盖 2023-07-10

Dude, which publications were rejected earlier? Take a look and let me know. It seems like there are very few published articles, which indicates that the difficulty level is not low.

islander 2023-07-08

Overall, the efficiency is very high. This article was submitted after being rejected three or four times. The reviewing style of Ambio is positive and gentle, and the experience is too comfortable! Thanks to the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences and the reviewers. I hope Ambio continues to rise!

永 2021-11-16

5.21 Manuscript number generated upon submission.
7.14 Email sent for major revisions with a deadline of 2 months.
9.9 Major revision documents submitted.
9.23 Minor revisions requested and returned with comments.
10.6 Minor revision documents submitted.
10.14 Decision made to accept.
11.9 Online.

Thank you very much for the positive feedback from both reviewers. As this is our first time submitting to SCI, the waiting period for the review felt quite long initially, but later on, the process felt quite fast.