认证评论 - IEEE Transactions on Robotics
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

administrator 2023-08-01

In the middle of last year. It is necessary to have a comprehensive and complete experimental design, outstanding experimental results, as well as innovation. Journals that can still increase their impact factor in 2022 are definitely top journals.

shen123r35 2023-03-29

The appearance of "Decision pending" means that it is likely to be rejected.

Alex2030 2023-02-10

It took about a year and a half to be admitted. I made multiple trips back and forth, and it feels like a promotion for my research.

罗继 2022-10-12

The top publication of robots.

caacb 2022-07-09

The first review took four months for major revisions, but the progress was slow due to the school closure caused by the epidemic. The second review took two months and was directly accepted.
Downgrading TRO to the second tier and still not being in the top is just too speechless.

frostalker 2022-07-03

The classification of the Chinese Academy of Sciences itself is a joke. Journal IoT, a pure water journal, has published over 1700 articles a year and has become a top tier journal in Zone 1. Our top journals in the field are only like this, but it's not too depressing. Look at the top journals in integrated circuit design and solid-state circuit journals, they have it even worse.

qiwang 2022-06-01

Hello, may I ask about your TRO application process and corresponding timeline, including any important notes?

C博士 2022-05-26

The cost-effectiveness of the top-tier journal TRO is decreasing, but the difficulty within it remains extremely high.

1111111 2022-04-11

To be honest, seeing the submission difficulty for TOR on Letpub - relatively easy, maybe it's just me being inexperienced...

scccsccc 2021-12-20

I found that the journal rankings of several robots have decreased, including RAS and AUTONOMOUS ROBOTS.

25252525 2021-12-20

IEEE TRO, this prestigious journal, has a well-known reputation with a percentile ranking as high as 98%. Before the emergence of Science Robotics, it was almost the only one in its class (compared to IJRR). It is now considered one of the top-tier journals alongside Science Robotics and IJRR. However, it is surprisingly listed as a second-tier journal by the Chinese Academy of Sciences. What a joke! This also shows that the classification system of the Chinese Academy of Sciences is a joke too!

大鱼儿1988 2021-10-21

Submission results will be given after three months. Since the topic is about robot positioning and navigation, the peer review comments were highly professional and constructive. There were a total of 27 comments from three reviewers. The response to the peer review comments spanned 29 pages. I feel that the review comments were very helpful in improving the quality of the manuscript.

风云 2021-10-15

Hello, do you need to provide a video of the experiment?

Cethy 2021-09-16

May I ask, what is the opinion that it has written? Is it a rejection or a rejection with encouragement to resubmit? Thank you~~~

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started