fubody 2023-08-08

Old magazine, indeed very fast speed, basically gives a reply within a month after each submission. The comments from the associate editor and reviewers indicate that they are knowledgeable peers. The reviewers' opinions directly point out the shortcomings in the article, and after careful revision and resubmission, the reviewers greatly agree with the improvements made to the article. The first SCI article has left a very good impression on the academic community's peer review process!

2023.4.7 Submitted
2023.4.8 Awaiting Editor Assignment
2023.4.10 Under Review
2023.5.3 Awaiting Decision
2023.5.4 Reject and resubmit allowed
2023.7.10 Resubmitted (under review)
2023.7.11 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment
2023.7.13 Under review
2023.7.31 Minor Revision
2023.8.3 Revision submitted (under review)
2023.8.4 Awaiting Decision (Accepted)
2023.8.5 Update the final version

小呆的弟弟 2023-08-07

2023.5.9 Submission
2023.6.19 Rejection and resubmission
2023.7.12 Resubmission
2023.8.1 Acceptance

xiangyang 2023-08-03

May I ask if there is any redundancy in resubmitting a rejected manuscript? The reviewer requested additional content, but the current page count is already 5 pages full.

快速见刊快速毕业 2023-07-27

Do ICL's journals have a Word template?

huxinyue 2023-07-24

Submitted on April 17th, rejected and resubmitted on May 26th, wrote a response letter of over 20 pages, revised on July 4th, accepted on July 24th. This is the fourth time submitting to CL, and I feel quite emotional. In the past, my three articles were directly rejected, and then revised carefully based on the editorial comments of CL, and submitted to WCL and SPL. This time, I finally got a chance to resubmit.

Ann029 2023-07-18

"You have been here longer than me."

Cecilia05 2023-07-18

It has been a month since "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment", and there has been no change.

Ann029 2023-07-16

Just make a good revision and it will be okay.

zpj123 2023-07-16

The results are out, rejected and resubmitted, the reviewer's comments are a bit tricky.

Ann029 2023-07-15

I have been waiting for a month and a half, but it is still not under review, and there has been no follow-up.

xiangyang 2023-07-14

It has been over a month since the manuscript was reviewed. Should I remind them to expedite the review? May I ask if any of you have ever reminded them to expedite the review?

zpj123 2023-07-13

It has been four days, and there is no news or progress. How much longer do we have to wait?

RERzeng 2023-07-13

However, the reviewers may not necessarily reply according to the timeline.

Ann029 2023-07-09

I have been under review for over a month, and there is still no result. Lately, I have been checking every day, afraid of missing anything.

zpj123 2023-07-09

I would like to ask everyone, it has been a month since my status changed from "awaiting reviewer assignment" to "under review". Isn't the time given to reviewers by this journal supposed to be three weeks? Why haven't I received an "awaiting decision" status yet?

zpj123 2023-07-09

I have been in the "Under review" status for a month since "awaiting reviewer assignment". Isn't the time given to reviewers by this journal three weeks? Why haven't we reached the "awaiting decision" stage yet?

Ann029 2023-07-05

Assigning a reviewer for one month is a bit slow, but you are fast afterwards. I reviewed for one month afterwards.

RERzeng 2023-07-05

Recently it has been quite slow, possibly because the journal intentionally slowed down the process. It took me one month to assign a reviewer for the first review, and the second review also took one month.

Ann029 2023-07-05

Thank you. Previously, when I submitted, the results would come out within a month. I'm not sure why it's taking so long now. If I review other people's manuscripts and ask for feedback within 3 weeks, I suspect it's being arbitrated.

RERzeng 2023-07-05

Normally, my classmate has been waiting for a decision for 8 days and still hasn't received any results.

Ann029 2023-07-05

It's been 40 days for me, and it feels cold.

RERzeng 2023-07-05

I first reviewed it for 50 days, which should be considered quite slow.

Ann029 2023-07-02

I spent 2 days from "Awaiting Admin Processing" to "Awaiting Editor Assignment", then another week from "Under review" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment". Now it has been approximately 26 days under review. The speed has slowed down a lot compared to before, and my submission status seems a bit abnormal.

Ann029 2023-07-02

Hello, how long did it take from "Awaiting Admin Processing" to get the first result? Previously, I would receive the result within a month, but now it has been over a month and there is no result yet.

RERzeng 2023-06-30

Normal, I allocated 10 days, and in the end, I rejected and resubmitted. It was accepted after 3 months as well.

Cecilia05 2023-06-30

Has it been a week already and it's still "Awaiting Editor Assignment"? Is it normal? How come everyone else seems to be so fast?

RERzeng 2023-06-27

Second review, return for revision on May 24th.
Awaiting decision on the evening of June 25th.
Accepted in the early morning of June 26th.
The speed is very fast, from submission to acceptance, exactly 3 months.

RERzeng 2023-06-22

May I ask how long does it usually take for the second review of IEEE CL? It has been four weeks and I still haven't received any results. Is this normal?

Ann029 2023-06-21

What is the current result? Has it been accepted?

Ann029 2023-06-21

Approximately 3-5 days under review.