蜗牛的天空 2023-07-15

The speed of manuscript review is acceptable, the quality of the journal is good, overall it is very good.

yongwu 2023-06-25

The combination of ecology and forestry, there are really too few journals to choose from.

1320970027 2023-06-21

June 20th, one reviewer has completed the review and is currently looking for another reviewer.

1320970027 2023-05-30

On May 29th, the editor once again looked for reviewers.

1320970027 2023-05-24

On May 19th, the editor re-searched and found two more reviewers, and now one reviewer has agreed to review.

爱祖国 2023-05-17

I submitted to FEM first, but it was rejected by this journal. The speed was quite fast, they rejected me in 3 days.

1320970027 2023-05-14

I think Forest Ecology and Management may be more suitable.

1320970027 2023-05-14

May 14th, still no reviewers have been found.

爱祖国 2023-05-11

Excuse me, OP, can we submit articles related to forest fire risks to this journal?

1320970027 2023-04-28

On April 26th and 27th, two reviewers were invited again, but they have not responded yet.

876557889dd 2023-04-27

May I ask how can we tell if only one reviewer was invited and there was no response?

1320970027 2023-04-27

On April 27th, the system shows that only one reviewer has been invited, but this reviewer has not responded.

1320970027 2023-04-11

The status changed to under review on April 11th.

1320970027 2023-04-10

Posted on March 27th, still with editor on April 10th.

依缘 2023-03-31

March 28, 2023 Required Reviews Completed
March 31, 2023 Accept
First paper of graduate school, Zone 1!

876557889dd 2023-03-20

These two journals are of the same level, one is top in water resources, and the other is top in forestry.
However, based on my long-term submission experience with these two journals, the peer review process in WRR is slightly stricter than in AFM.
The peer review process of AGU's journals, including GRL, JGR, and WRR, is generally very strict, with more American editors and reviewers.
Overall, both journals are of the same level and are half a level higher than JoH.
The main difference lies in the field. WRR focuses more on hydrology and water resources, while AFM focuses more on ecohydrology, ecology, flux, and meteorology.

依缘 2023-03-20

September 29, 2022 Submitted to journal
September 30, 2022 With Editor
October 12, 2022 Under Review
March 1, 2023 Required Review Complete
March 5, 2023 Minor Revision
March 12, 2023 With Editor
March 14, 2023 With Editor (time status changed)
March 19, 2023 Under Review
...
In the process of revision and awaiting results, hoping for mercy from the reviewers and wishing for good luck.

依缘 2023-03-19

May I ask the teachers, which one is better, AFM or WRR?

温柔善良帅气 2023-02-21

This brother's evaluation is very accurate. The recognition of agricultural and forestry meteorology is still higher than hydrology. However, at present, both can be considered as good journals worth investing in. You can try from agricultural and forestry meteorology to hydrology. Of course, if you lean towards hydrology and water resources, you can start with Water Resources Research (WRR).

ysalc 2023-02-17

Translation: I have had long-term submission experiences with the journals AFM and JOH. Here are my thoughts:

1) AFM has better quality and higher recognition than JOH, and this is beyond doubt.
2) AFM has a longer publication cycle and publishes fewer articles per year.
3) JOH covers a wide range of topics, making it somewhat miscellaneous, while AFM is more specialized, especially in the fields of ecology, ecohydrology, fluxes, and meteorology.
4) If you have confidence in your article and are not in a hurry to publish, I would recommend submitting to AFM. Otherwise, I would suggest JOH, considering that it is also a first-tier journal.

GOPB 2023-02-17

I would like to ask you experts, which one is better, AFM or Journal of Hydrology?

sdct 2023-02-15

The first review took 4 months for major revisions.
The revision took 1.5 months.
After the second review, it was rejected after 2 months.
In total, it took 8 months.

就叫昵称 2022-10-20

The first review took three months for major revisions.
The modification took about half a month.
The second review took a little over a month for minor revisions.
The third review took nearly a month for acceptance.
In total, it took more than 7 months.

蔚茫 2022-09-16

2022.09.12 Rejection

蔚茫 2022-09-06

2022/09/03 submitted to journal
09/05 with editor

Translated text:
Submitted to journal on September 3, 2022.
Reviewed by the editor on September 5.

WF7 2022-07-20

The highly reputable journal, with good reputation, assigned three reviewers. The review process was moderately fast, taking three months from submission to online publication.
There was a minor revision in the middle, which was given one month for completion. After two days of making the revisions, the editor accepted it directly.

SIFresearcher 2022-06-22

After undergoing one major revision, three reviewers, and three minor revisions, mostly on irrelevant issues, it was finally accepted on June 17th.

jiujiezhe 2022-06-07

2021-07-14 Submission
2021-09-03 Rejection (Both reviewers recommended major revisions, but one reviewer suggested resubmission. Editor rejected the paper but provided an opportunity for resubmission.)
2021-12-02 Resubmission after revisions (Took three months due to procrastination)
2022-01-20 Major revisions given two months
2022-03-22 Revised again
2022-06-06 Accepted directly
My first SCI paper took nearly a year, including the initial rejection and resubmission due to poor writing on my part. From the second submission onwards, excluding my own procrastination time, the total processing time of the journal was four months, which might be considered relatively slow. The most crucial factor was my own procrastination in making the necessary revisions to the paper.

Keynes 2022-06-01

Received at Editorial Office: 24 Dec 2021
Article revised: 16 Apr 2022
Article accepted for publication: 31 May 2022

小池塘 2022-06-01

May I ask, when you review the manuscript, can you see if the reviewer has suggested major revisions or minor revisions?