shilonl 2023-01-02

Summary article submitted in early June, got a response within three days but not a direct rejection. The editor provided suggestions for modifications and gave a month to integrate the content. At the end of the month, it was resubmitted and placed under review. However, it took a long time for the reviewer to be found, resulting in a review period of almost three months. After receiving the reviewer's comments, the editor requested major revisions, and after the modifications were made, the article was accepted directly.

ciqujingnian 2022-10-18

Hello, may I ask if your peer review status is updated in a timely manner?

蓝兰@小8 2022-09-15

I submitted the article at the beginning of August, and by the end of August, I received feedback for revision from the first review. The review process was quick, and both the editor and the reviewer were very nice, suggesting only minor revisions. After submitting the revised version in early September, I received acceptance notification within about a week. Overall, the process went smoothly, and this journal's influence in the field of pharmacy is increasing. I hope it continues to improve.

gjgjghjgk 2021-09-11

Brother, I would like to ask, does this magazine have any requirements for raw data, or is it not necessary to provide the raw data?

kuiper 2021-03-05

Submitted in July, revised in August, revised again two weeks later, and accepted in September. A total of two revisions were made, with each revision taking about a month for review. The second revision received appreciation from the editor, mainly focusing on innovation and logical reasoning. It is a very good journal in the field of medicinal chemistry, and the editor's comments are very fair.

春华秋实1 2021-01-29

Posted on December 25, 2020; Review comments returned on January 10, 2021, major revisions required; Revised manuscript submitted on February 10, 2021; Under review on February 12, 2021; Article accepted on February 28, 2021. Overall, the process was quite fast, both reviewers were professional, and they raised more than ten questions without requesting additional experiments. It was quite fortunate.