认证评论 - ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

YL0 2023-08-05

As of the revision submission on July 19th, 2023, it is still under review. Hopefully, it will be accepted soon and bring good luck.

ysy001 2023-08-03

Supplement 2023.7.6 revision (5 reviewers, 3 weeks for revisions, should it be a major revision or a minor revision)

ysy001 2023-08-03

2023.5.15 submitted to journal
2023.5.16 with editor
2023.5.18 with editor (date changed)
2023.6.5 under review
2023.6.15 under review (date changed)
2023.6.28 required reviews completed
2023.7.4 required reviews completed (date changed)
2023.7.5 decision in process
2023.7.19 revisions submitted
2023.7.20 with editor
2023.7.21 with editor (date changed)
2023.8.2 decision in process
2023.8.3 accept

AixLeft 2023-07-31

How long have you been in the RRC, brothers and sisters?

ysy001 2023-07-25

The text translates to: "Returned for repair for 4 days without being reviewed by the editor, it should be because there are more backlog manuscripts recently and there was no time to handle them."

aaas,truth 2023-07-24

So strange, a long time.

both accept 2023-07-24

There shouldn't be any. My editorial comments are not complicated.

cnpk 2023-07-24

Jul 23, 2023 Under Review

cnpk 2023-07-24

Jul 23, 2023 with editor

aaas,truth 2023-07-23

Are you Editor-in-Chief Wang?

aaas,truth 2023-07-22

I want to ask if you are doing a major repair or a minor repair. After the repair, will it be reviewed?

aaas,truth 2023-07-22

It has been 4 days since the return for revision with the editor, but it has not been submitted for review yet.

cnpk 2023-07-21

7.21 avec éditeur translated into English is "7.21 with editor."

cnpk 2023-07-21

2023.7.20 제출됨 (Submitted) to Journal.

bloomying 2023-07-21

The second submission
Submitted to journal on June 9, 2023
With editor on June 9, 2023
With editor on June 11, 2023
Under Review since June 20, 2023
Required Reviews Complete on July 10, 2023 (4 out of 7 received)
Decision in progress on July 15, 2023
Transfer/Rejected on July 19, 2023

Two revisions were requested, and one reviewer rejected the paper citing mismatched topic and nitpicking grammar errors. It is unclear why the editor made a rejection decision before receiving the review from the fourth reviewer. They suggested transferring the paper to the open-access journal Heliyon, stating that it can be accepted without external review. Although it is the decision letter from Editor Wang, there is strong suspicion that the manuscript was handled by the editor of this open-access journal. Editor Wang is very efficient, as the decision in progress took only four to five days.

0903 2023-07-19

After five days, my status is still "decision in process". I would like to ask the original poster (OP) what happened next.

PDJSU 2023-07-14

Have you rejected it? Mine is also the same.

PDJSU 2023-07-14

My submission also changed to "decision in process" after one day, and it has been three days already. Does it mean that it will be rejected?

PDJSU 2023-07-14

Does changing the status to "decision in process" mean that the manuscript will be rejected?

上上签111 2023-07-14

May I ask how many characters you require to be deleted?

ysy001 2023-07-12

Could you please let me know if the revisions will be accepted without being sent back to the reviewer?

both accept 2023-07-12

2023.05.16 submitted
2023.05.17 with editor
2023.06.06 under review
2023.06.19 revise
2023.07.02 revision submitted to journal
2023.07.03 with editor
2023.07.03 accept
Thank you, Professor Wang Aijie.

PDJSU 2023-07-12

My editor also just submitted today, and then a little while later it got rejected.

水文狗 2023-07-10

Does doing deep learning for water quality prediction align with the scope of this journal?

水文狗 2023-07-10

With the editor, it has been a week since I directly submitted, and I still haven't received a rejection. What should I do? Isn't it supposed to be fast?

我会发光耶 2023-07-08

After making one modification, it is directly received.

特日格勒呼 2023-07-07

After the second review, are there any comments from the reviewers or will it be accepted directly?

ceciP 2023-07-06

0531 submitted to journal
0601 revise (amend Declaration of interests) resubmitted on the same day
0602 revise (too many words and charts; requested to delete)
0603 submitted to journal
0604 with editor
0605 under review
0613 required reviews completed
0624 decision in process
0625 revise
0704 submit
0705 accept
A very good submission experience. Thank you to the kind editor, Robert Letcher, and the lenient reviewers.

aaas,truth 2023-07-05

I'm nervous.

aaas,truth 2023-07-04

How long does it usually take for everyone to be in RRC? I've been in RRC for four days already.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started