认证评论 - ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

花朝 2023-08-08

Reply to the man who won the national award: Hello, the student from your research group was given major revisions in the first review, and then the second review was rejected.

花朝 2023-08-08

Hello, did you receive a major revision during the first review, and then it was rejected again during the second review?

拿国奖的男人 2023-08-06

Be careful, someone from the research group has been rejected for 3 months, not a good person.

花朝 2023-08-05

Hello everyone, I would like to ask about EP editing. Has anyone had their manuscript edited by Professor Hocheol Song? What is his editing style like? If a paper requires major revisions, what is the likelihood of it being rejected? Is the processing time for the next draft lengthy? Thank you.

小川 2023-07-29

After RRC, does it become a DIP? Will I be rejected? Can someone with experience shed some light on this?

zxy1112 2023-07-28

Does EP not accept resubmission after rejection? If I make revisions according to the reviewer's comments without receiving an invitation from the editor, will it still be rejected for sure? Has anyone had experience with resubmitting after rejection?

ZJU-DYH 2023-07-25

April submission, one and a half months for major revisions, one month for acceptance after major revisions are completed, lasting for three months.

A_A 2023-07-13

Hired, the process from submission to acceptance took 4.5 months.

Dl113 2023-07-11

Translation:

Summary:
5.6 Submission
5.7 Editing process
6.27 Feedback received
7.5 Revised manuscript returned for editing process
7.6 Submitted for review
7.11 Accepted

Dl113 2023-07-06

7.5 Submit revised manuscript; editor processing;
7.6 External review

Dl113 2023-07-06

You can choose, but the actual editor is not the one I chose.

哈哈1994 2023-07-06

Can the editor still choose by themselves?

aomandeamu 2023-07-03

The revision consists of two reviewers' comments, which include minor revisions and major revisions. The deadline for modifications is set at 20 days.

aomandeamu 2023-07-03

2023.5.9 with editor
2023.5.15 under review
2023.6.10 Major Revision
2023.6.29 with editor (submitted revised version)
2023.7.3 under review
Waiting for final results...

Dl113 2023-06-27

6.27 major revision. There were 3 reviewers, and their comments were mostly positive. I will start making the necessary changes in some time.

kiranedved 2023-06-27

Before the release of WHO's air quality guideline in 2021, I submitted an article on the health effects of ozone. One of the reviewers directly provided several references and asked me to use the parameters and measurement methods mentioned in them... I had to redo all the calculations...

After the release of WHO's 2021 guidelines, I was shocked to find that all the methods and parameters mentioned in them were the same as recommended by the reviewer. I guess I encountered a heavyweight from WHO...

But why is EP (Environmental Pollution) only ranked as a second-tier journal by the Chinese Academy of Sciences? I don't agree!

TTVTT 2023-06-20

Me too, the submission I made in March is still under review. It shows that only one person has provided feedback, and I am hesitating whether to remind them or not.

pwz 2023-06-19

It has been half a month. I feel like it's going to be rejected.

AQ1 2023-06-15

The opinions of the reviewers should not have all returned.

A_A 2023-06-15

I submitted the article on the last day of February this year, and it is still in peer review. Is the review process of EP really slow?

灌水老先生 2023-06-15

A week ago, there was a manuscript for my boss to review. The author was from India, and the editor was an Arab (obtained a PhD degree in India). After clicking agree, my boss didn't have time temporarily. However, yesterday he sent an email saying that there was no need to review it anymore. The general idea was that the environmental issues were serious, and my colleague, EP, wanted a quick response, so it won't bother you. Initially, the review was given 14 days. It's quite funny when I say it out loud, and everyone knows the reason, right?

pwz 2023-06-13

It has been more than ten days. What is the situation?

花朝 2023-05-28

Everyone submit their questions and concerns for discussion.

Jaanai 2023-05-22

May I ask about the status of your manuscript review? Are you interested in submitting a review?

天火 2023-05-20

EP is now a good journal, but unfortunately it is not highly recognized by the Chinese Academy of Sciences for dual communication. DIP is 99% transferred, so don't take chances.

Dl113 2023-05-16

5.16 is currently being reviewed.

Dl113 2023-05-16

Still the same, mine is still with the editor.

兽兽 2023-05-16

Is "decision in process" the current status?

Dl113 2023-05-16

I asked customer service, and they said that recently there has been a change in the editors, which has resulted in a backlog of many manuscripts, and they are still waiting.

兽兽 2023-05-15

Can accept, why not give a straightforward explanation? ?

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started