风飞-2 2023-06-25

One first review and one minor revision were given, and a major revision was requested (2023.05.25 Major Revision); 2023.06.05 Revision submitted, 2023.06.05 In peer review, 2023.06.16 With Editor, 2023.06.21 In peer review. Does anyone know why it was resubmitted for review again? Has anyone experienced a similar situation?

Leve 2023-06-12

The text translates to:
"The submission was made on May 18th. By the end of May, it changed from initial review to 'with editor.' Today is June 12th, and it is still 'with editor.' It has been 25 days."

zfc111 2023-06-01

First submission
Submitted on 21st November 2022
Received resubmission on 23rd January 2023
Due to Christmas holidays, it took two months, and the editor explained that the office was closed.

Resubmitted on 17th April 2023
10 days for the initial process
Accepted directly after one month, the entire process took approximately 45 days

Thanks to the reviewers and editors!

KEYYYYY 2023-06-01

I would like to ask everyone if it is necessary to write a proposal to the editorial department in advance for submitting an overview paper to EES? Is there any relevant template available? I couldn't find it on the journal's website. Thank you, everyone!

123t 2023-05-24

2022.8.5 submitted
2022.8.15 in peer review
2022.10.14 major revision
2022.12.31 revision submitted
2023.02.22 accept
2023.3.15 online

The first round of review took three rounds with five reviewers. There were really a lot of reviewers, constantly switching between "in peer review" and "with editor", which was nerve-wracking. Fortunately, there were no rejections. The editor requested major revisions but only gave us 10 days to conduct additional experiments. We realized we couldn't complete the experiments in time, so we asked for an additional three months for major revisions. The second round of review also took a long time. The editor sent an email explaining that two reviewers had not responded, so the editor decided to accept the paper directly. The whole process was quite lengthy. Generally, articles on EES (Electronic Editorial System) don't take this long. It was considered an atypical long duration.

penguin 2023-04-29

4.27 with editor
4.28 in peer review
4.29 with editor
Why did it come back to the editor again? Hopefully, they are looking for reviewers. I hope they don't reject me. I'm tired.

aadadsaaa 2023-04-20

Submitted on 28th March 2023, followed by initial inspection.
Assigned editor for review on the same day on 4th April 2023.
Both reviewers provided minor revisions on 19th April 2023, but the system displayed major revisions.
(Not sure why there is no submission deadline for revised manuscripts.)

May I ask everyone if this RSC system can only display major revisions, or if it is indeed major revisions? Will there be new reviewers for the second review?

Monster Arthur 2023-04-12

2023.03.13 in peer review (It seems that the editorial department intentionally delayed it, as they recently accepted two articles in the same field)
2023.03.27 minor revision (Just as the editorial department started working on Monday, we received an email, suspecting it was set on automatic sending. Two reviewers, one minor revision and one direct acceptance. Thank you to the reviewers!)
2023.03.30 revision submitted
2023.03.31 accept
The constant back and forth of the status is quite torturous, and I haven't found any effective comments earlier.
Just wanted to share this with everyone, wishing you all smooth article submissions!

Monster Arthur 2023-04-12

2023.02.18 submitted
2023.02.19 initial assessment
2023.02.20 with editor
2023.02.22 in peer review
2023.02.24 with editor
2023.02.27 in peer review, with editor
2023.02.28 in peer review (should be switching between states to find reviewers)
2023.03.03 with editor (Friday, seems like the first reviewer returned comments)
2023.03.06 in peer review
2023.03.11 with editor (Saturday, seems like the second reviewer returned comments)

Aspirin0810 2023-04-11

2023.03.14 submitted
2023.03.15 initial assessment
2023.03.15 with editor
2023.03.16 in peer review
2023.03.25 with editor
2023.03.28 in peer review
2023.04.02 with editor
2023.04.03 in peer review
2023.04.07 with editor
2023.04.11 in peer review
Does anyone know why there are frequent reviews happening?

Jumpdowner 2023-04-08

2023.01.09 submitted
2023.01.17 in peer review
2023.02.28 Reminder for submission.
2023.03.01 One day after the reminder, the review comments were sent. Two positive and one negative comments. The editor requested a major revision and a prompt response. At the same time, the editor explained the slow review process was because initially there were two reviewers with conflicting opinions, so a third senior reviewer was assigned. The third reviewer provided minor revisions and also refuted the rejection comments from the second reviewer (it appeared that the rejection reasons from the second reviewer were not very professional and raised doubts about their expertise in our field).
2023.03.14 The editor sent an email requesting a prompt response to the review comments.
2023.03.18 Submission of the review response.
2023.04.03 Accepted. The acceptance letter indicated that it seems the editor did not directly send the review response to the reviewer who initially rejected the paper (or did not adopt the final opinion of that reviewer).

Fortune Wu 2023-03-03

May I ask if the invitation for arbitration and peer review on 11.10 was from the editor?

sher 2023-01-02

2022.10.16 Submitted
2022.10.17 Initial assessment
2022.10.20 With Editor
2022.10.21 In peer review
2022.11.10 With Editor In peer review
2022.11.17 With Editor Major Revision
2022.11.29 Submitted
2022.11.30 With Editor
2022.12.01 In peer review
2022.12.08 Accepted

Translation:
2022.10.16 Submitted
2022.10.17 Initial assessment
2022.10.20 With Editor
2022.10.21 In peer review
2022.11.10 With Editor In peer review
2022.11.17 With Editor Major Revision
2022.11.29 Submitted
2022.11.30 With Editor
2022.12.01 In peer review
2022.12.08 Accepted

沉寂 2022-12-20

11.17 Submission
11.27 Under review
12.09 Revision, two reviewers, positive evaluations from both
12.15 Return
12.19 Acceptance
A relatively smooth submission experience

HIT-liu 2022-11-17

7.27 Submission
9.21 Revision, two reviewers, major revisions required, editor's major revisions
10.29 Return
11.11 Accepted

Siatwo 2022-10-26

2022.10.26 accept, I entered the wrong time, otherwise I would have time-traveled.

Siatwo 2022-10-26

2022.8.29 initial submitted - Submitted initially on August 29, 2022.
2022.9.6 in peer review - Under peer review on September 6, 2022.
2022.10.3 major revision (两小修，一拒稿，编辑给仲裁，仲裁审稿人给了accept) - Major revision on October 3, 2022 (Two minor revisions, one rejection, editor sent for arbitration, arbitrator reviewer accepted).
2022.10.15 revision submitted - Submitted revised version on October 15, 2022.
2022.5.26 accept - Accepted on May 26, 2022.

ss_7 2022-07-13

6.30 submitted - This means that something was submitted on June 30th.
7.8 with editor - This means that something is currently being reviewed or worked on by an editor as of July 8th.
7.11 in peer review - This means that something is currently being reviewed by peers or experts as of July 11th.

1990111 2022-07-08

14 days for review, 37 days for initial review feedback, 7 days for second review, accepted after 2 months and 22 days, moderate speed.

复制粘贴 2022-07-05

2022.07.04 Checking submission and files
2022.07.05 Initial assessment
2022.07.13 with editor
2023 reject

Palpitate 2022-07-01

I would like to ask, how long after the peer review did you receive the results?

NE-NC 2022-06-30

It has been 10 days since the initial review, how long does this journal usually take to decide whether to send it for further review?

论文研发者 2022-06-29

"Slow speed is a good thing, and the reviewer is very friendly."

冰糖葫芦雪儿糕 2022-05-19

May I ask how long it takes to get the results after becoming "with editor"? It took me 18 days to become "with editor".

cui. 2022-05-15

It has been 20 days since submission, and it is still in the "with editor" status. How long does it usually take for review?

让我发个大子刊吧 2022-05-15

2022.3.6 initial submitted
2022.3.16 in peer review
2022.4.21 minor revision
2022.4.27 revision submitted
2022.5.10 accept

让我发个大子刊吧 2022-05-13

It's okay, no need to worry. Usually, it takes about 2 weeks to consider, and you will know the results in these two days.

崽崽今天中Nature了么？ 2022-05-09

I have been waiting for 11 days since I submitted it on 4.28, and it is still in the initial assessment status.

让我发个大子刊吧 2022-04-28

2022.3.6 Initial submission
2022.3.16 In peer review
2022.4.21 Minor revision
2022.4.27 Revision submitted

Cedar 2022-04-20

Preliminary assessment is around 10 days.