认证评论 - EMBO REPORTS
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

keyanxiaolj 2022-12-26

Old magazines, the reputation is still good. The review process is also very rigorous, unlike some inferior journals. What is puzzling is that a small CDD edited by a Chinese expert has become a first-tier journal, while this one has been kicked out of the first-tier. I can't understand it.

指挥棒 2022-12-22

I don't know if the leaders of the country are aware of how excessively the Chinese Academy of Sciences uses the baton in its division. Supporting domestic journals is a good thing, but it shouldn't be done at the expense of pulling up seedlings to help them grow. It disregards the life and death of personnel without qualifications. This is also the way it is for the scientific research big shots. They randomly publish and it becomes a first-tier journal. Thumbs up!

指挥棒 2022-12-22

Typical of making a big deal out of trivial matters, replacing classic journals with domestic ones. But can the domestic journals be obtained by researchers with no qualifications? They are just taking advantage of leaders' lack of understanding in research and messing around, truly amazing!

指挥棒 2022-12-22

?, kick out of the first division, kick out of the top, IJMS and other water journals are all top, is this how you use a baton?

方建 2022-12-22

Currently, there is a paper in the second round of review, which has been resubmitted to a different journal after being rejected by a top-tier journal. The first round of review provided more than 20 comments, which were exceptionally strict.

Does the classification system of the Chinese Academy of Sciences aim to eliminate good papers in favor of inferior ones?

slientwo 2022-10-18

EMBO Publishing House, the second-in-command, was established in 2000. Cell reports, under the umbrella of CELL, should be imitating the publishing concept of this magazine, with an extremely similar style. However, EMBO reports are more rigorous. Everyone can try submitting their articles, and if you get accepted after external review, you will have a profound experience. It mainly accepts articles related to molecular biology. The magazine is very good, but there are very few Chinese submissions. It is mainly favored by some researchers from Chinese institutes.

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started