认证评论 - ELECTRONICS LETTERS
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

重型卡车 2023-04-27

Published an article before it was not open-source, now I can't afford to publish anymore. The fourth district is still so expensive...

大开大海 2023-04-06

el can be 3 pages already.

大开大海 2023-04-06

In this way, el is not as good as motl. However, el's ancestral reputation has not completely disappeared yet. Ultimately, which one to choose depends on whether one thinks that 15,000 is worth these remnants of reputation.

violetzhz 2023-04-05

What I understand is that the EL (Entity Linking) that was not open-sourced before, I feel that the current EL innovation requirement is definitely not as high as before. In terms of innovation, it is still slightly higher than MOTL (Model of the Task and Language), but the difference is not significant. Moreover, EL, with only two pages, is too short. I think MOTL can also describe the work in more detail more easily.

大开大海 2023-03-30

Excuse me, regarding IET EL, some people talk about the requirement for innovation. Some say it is high, roughly equivalent to the other three zones; others say it doesn't seem that high, like what you mentioned, it seems to be the requirement for innovation but not too high. May I ask what kind of requirements do you think IET EL has? How does it compare to MOTL? MOTL seems to be slower but not significantly, and it is free. What do you think about MOTL?

violetzhz 2023-03-20

Before it was open source, EL had many excellent research papers. However, after it became open source, the quality dropped significantly, and the publication fee is extremely expensive.
There was an IEEE MWCL paper that I didn't want to revise extensively, so I condensed it into two pages and submitted it to EL for the sake of convenience.
As long as the innovation is strong, the review process is still relatively fast.
03-Mar-2023 submitted
15-Mar-2023 Minor Revision
20-Mar-2023 Accept

Williamfantacy 2023-02-20

18-Jan-2023 submitted
until 20-Feb-2023 under review

中二也要做科研 2023-01-19

17th submission: Undergoing initial checking
18th submission: Awaiting SE (Subject Editor) Assignment and Pending Editor Assignment
19th submission: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment today
That's quite a rapid pace.

ken0225 2023-01-18

Update: Published on Jan 16, 2023~

The downside of this journal is that it is very slow, taking over 4 months from submission to publication. In the future, I should rarely submit to this journal.

中二也要做科研 2023-01-17

Take a small job that is not urgent to be published, and try it out. The first draft is one and a half pages long. Let's see if he gives me the opportunity to make modifications.

大龙飞天 2023-01-05

The paper review process is too slow. It's just a 3-page paper that was submitted on November 15th, and there is still no result. It's very frustrating.

ken0225 2022-12-16

Return the small repair on the 15th at 4 p.m., it was accepted on the morning of the 16th!

ken0225 2022-12-13

Record it.

Submitted: 8/1/2022

Sent two reminder emails in between.

Minor repair: 12/12/2022

Gave 14 days' time.

longde55 2022-12-05

When you resubmit your manuscript, should the response to the reviewers be included in the cover letter? Do you need to mention the previous rejection ID number?

Terry 2022-10-14

2022.4.10 Submission
2022.9.15 Minor revision
2022.9.27 Accepted

This letter was indeed slow in its progress and was consistently in the process of finding reviewers. Luckily, the outcome was good.

清神 2022-09-18

Hello, may I ask if this journal will send a clean copy for revisions after acceptance? Thank you.

清神 2022-09-18

Hello, may I ask if this journal will send a proof for modification? The unit's letter is spelled incorrectly... Also, when should the payment be made? Thank you.

清神 2022-09-16

Hello, may I ask how to pay for this journal? I received an email when submitting the manuscript. Is it 1964 USD or 2310 USD to be paid? Will there be an email notification for payment after acceptance? Thank you.

清神 2022-09-16

2022.08.10 Submission
2022.08.13 Awaiting reviewer assignment
2022.08.21 Under review
2022.08.30 Pending Recommendation - Sent two reminder emails
2022.09.10 Pending decision
2022.09.11 Minor revision - Literature and formatting issues, very simple
2022.09.12 Revised
2022.09.13 Assigned+Under review, etc.
2022.09.16 Accepted
Overall, as long as the reviewers agree to review, the process is fast. It is a two-page paper with high innovation requirements. Now I don't know how to pay the fee.

ken0225 2022-09-10

Why did it take me a month to start reviewing the assignment? It has been under review for ten days and still no news. Is this a tragedy?

ken0225 2022-09-10

Why did it take a month for my reviewer assignment to start under review? It has been under review for ten days now and there is still no news. Is it a tragedy?

BingXiCoder 2022-09-06

Submit: 2022.07.12
Minor revision: 2022.07.26
Revision Submit: 2022.08.06
Accept: 2022.08.23

The overall speed is still very fast, but there is one reviewer who actually suggested that I expand it into a full paper and asked a lot of basic concepts. I can't understand why. I have already sent a letter, do I still need to write such detailed basic concepts, such as what learning rate is and what Epoch is? It's a bit frustrating. Due to the length, I didn't add these in the original text, only explained them in detail in the response. After revising, he still had comments, saying that the length did not reach 3 pages (indeed, it didn't, just a few lines left, but doesn't formatting also require some empty space, who can perfectly fit it into 3 pages?). In the end, the editor didn't pay attention to these comments and directly accepted it.

Litsay 2022-04-21

2021.11 Submission
2022.03 Minor revision
2022.03 Revised
2022.04 Accepted

The reviewers' comments are quite professional, and it is necessary to carefully consider the minor revisions. The scholarone system is not very user-friendly when submitting revisions.

syj20094870 2022-03-24

Have you finished your review?

ak45457 2022-03-24

1.29 投: 1.29投 signifies "投" on January 29th.
3.23 直接拒: 3.23直接拒 translates to "直接拒" on March 23rd, meaning "directly rejected".

Terry 2022-03-22

2021.11.23 Submission
2022.2.15 Minor revision
2022.3.12 Accepted

wtyx 2022-03-04

I also submitted it in February, and it has been more than 20 days, but it is still awaiting reviewer assignment.

ak45457 2022-03-02

It has been over a month since the end of January and it is still awaiting reviewer assignment.

syj20094870 2022-03-02

I submitted an article on the 17th of last month, and it is still "awaiting reviewer assignment" up until now. Have you started the review process yet?

小木虫free 2022-02-21

I wonder if the upstairs one has received the result? Mine is also still awaiting reviewer assignment.

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started