@hy2017 2023-02-20

After nearly three months of experience, the overall result is good. The editors and reviewers were very diligent and responsible. One reviewer, in particular, was exceptionally thorough. By incorporating their suggestions and feedback, the paper has greatly improved. This is truly gratifying as it is my first time submitting during my master's program.

@hy2017 2023-02-20

The translation of "2023.2.19 accept" into English is "Accept on February 19, 2023."

@hy2017 2023-02-19

R2 is because during the Chinese New Year, a small portion of the testing was not completed, so the editor granted an extension of ten days.

@hy2017 2023-02-16

2022.11.03 Submission
2022.11.09 With Editor
2022.11.12 Under Review
2022.11.20 Under Review
2022.12.22 Required Reviews Completed
2022.12.27 Revise
2023.01.25 Revision 1
2023.02.06 Required Reviews Completed / Revise
2023.02.13 Revision 2

小西贝贝 2023-02-16

2023.2.16, still no response.

肥鹅大王 2023-02-12

Did I read it correctly, Basic Edition Zone 3 of the community?? Is this zoning a joke?

花火夜空 2023-01-22

Last year, I submitted to this journal and forgot to come back and update the submission status. Now, I want to share it:

2022-05-01 Submitted to Journal
2022-05-04 With Editor
2022-05-11 Under Review
2022-07-02 Under Review
2022-07-03 Under Review
2022-07-04 Under Review
2022-08-27 Under Review
2022-10-11 Under Review
2022-10-15 Required Reviews Completed
2022-10-16 Revision
2022-10-19 Revision Submitted to Journal
2022-10-19 Under Review
2022-11-11 Accepted

The "under review" status was updated three times, indicating that they may have reached out to multiple reviewers. In the end, I received comments from reviewers 2 and 6. One of them didn't mention any major issues, while the other requested additional experiments. Luckily, they were both easy to do. After resubmission, it took about 20 days to receive acceptance.

In conclusion, the editor's speed was decent, but the reviewers played a crucial role in determining the submission timeline.

hub3156 2023-01-15

Okay, after undergoing revisions on January 15th, the reference materials have finally been submitted for review.

hub3156 2023-01-12

Isn't this too long, bro?

s辛五 2023-01-11

The result is good, but the process lasted for seven months.

实验室的兔子 2023-01-09

I have been submitting my manuscript for four months, but I haven't received any feedback on the review.

hub3156 2023-01-06

30th submission, it's been a week, and there is no news at all. I am very anxious.

小西贝 2022-12-30

I submitted it around 11:15, and it is still under review. I haven't received any tracking link in my email either. I don't know what's going on.

Kreveng 2022-12-20

Came back to fulfill the vow. The article was successfully received. Here are the specific dates recorded:
12.09 - Revisions submitted to the journal.
12.09 - Under review.
12.20 - Required reviews completed.
12.20 - Accepted.

The revised manuscript was carefully reviewed by the reviewers, who also pointed out a minor error. They hope for it to be corrected during the proof stage. Overall, the process was fast, and everyone can refer to it.

多少带点水 2022-11-18

11.18, it has been three months since submission and two and a half months since the review process started. The status remains unchanged until now, and there have been no reviewers assigned to review the manuscript.

Kreveng 2022-11-16

Excuse me, what is the current submission number?

Claire Yuan 2022-11-15

8.15 submitted to journal
11.15 under review
Now it's very slow, very slow.

徐徐微风 2022-11-14

After submitting, there was no response, not even a number. I don't know what happened.

Kreveng 2022-11-13

Yes, the submission was on October 25th (it was written incorrectly above), and the revision was done on November 10th, taking about two weeks.

Kreveng 2022-11-10

Made a mistake, the initial time was all in October...

Kreveng 2022-11-10

To record the submission process, as follows:
11.25 submitted to journal
11.26 with editor
11.27 under review
11.28 under review (I presume the second reviewer accepted the review, so the date changed)
11.3 under review (presuming the first reviewer returned their review comments)
11.9 required reviews completed (the second reviewer returned their review comments)
11.10 revise
There are two reviewers in total, and both evaluations are relatively positive. This article cost a lot and involved a lot of original characterization. The reviewers still recognized it to some extent and provided one month for revisions. The results will be updated later. Personally, I think it's relatively fast, possibly because of the direction of the research and the editor involved.

@hy2017 2022-11-09

It has been six days, and it has not yet reached the hands of the editor, nor has it been assigned a number.

啦木 2022-11-05

Submitted in early November.
Returned for revision on December 7th. All three reviewers suggested major revisions. The first submission had incomplete data and poorly drawn figures, but perhaps the highlights of the article were good enough that the reviewers did not reject it. The editor may have felt that there was not enough time and rejected it, but the rejection letter emphasized the need to resubmit with revisions and indicated the number of the first draft.

Resubmitted on January 18th.
Accepted on March 20th, after showing it to the original reviewers who all stated that it was fine and greatly improved. No further modifications were made.

It is evident that the Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry focuses more on the highlights of the article rather than the aesthetics of the figures, unlike some other journals. Articles with innovative and eye-catching points should be submitted here. There is no need to follow the trend of creating flashy and extravagant figures, constantly thinking about the colors and aspect ratios of the figures rather than focusing on the data itself. This is simply a misguided and unproductive practice.

baughman 2022-11-04

Submitted on October 30th, it has been almost a week already, and they haven't even provided a manuscript number. It's hard to put into words.

AllenzzZ 2022-10-20

Last week, another reminder was sent, but no reply has been received. The status of the review has not changed so far. It's frustrating, just have to wait patiently. qwq

Chemelec 2022-10-20

A very enjoyable submission, all review comments were received within a week and the opportunity for revisions was given. One of the reviewers raised several questions about electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, and I learned a lot while conducting additional experiments. Surprisingly, the second review took more than three weeks. Overall, the submission experience was good! Hopefully, there will be a chance for EA to return to Area 1.

彦彦于飞 2022-10-17

2022.5.24 submit
2022.5.29 under review
2022.7.28 under review
2022.9.10 revise
2022.9.27 revision submit
2022.9.28 under review
2022.10.17 accept

It took nearly five months, with the first review taking three and a half months. There were two inquiries about the status during the first review. Finally, there is a positive outcome.

科研小蔡 2022-10-16

Hello, just wanted to ask if you have updated the progress now. I've been waiting for twenty days, just like you.

科研小蔡 2022-10-16

Hello, I want to ask if you have updated your progress now. I have been waiting for twenty days, just like you.

AllenzzZ 2022-10-09

"For those who are urging in the submission system, then received an automatic reply from the editor in the email."