认证评论 - CORROSION SCIENCE
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

雨住人 2023-08-08

Submit for review 2 months after submission, receive feedback in 1 month, make revisions for 3 weeks, send back to editor for half a month, and receive acceptance in 3 weeks. The journal is great, but the speed needs improvement. No rush, can take time to submit.

不是诺贝尔本人 2023-08-07

7.12 submit
7.12 with editor
8.7 status unchanged, not yet submitted for review

921T 2023-08-02

My investment on July 20th, WE on July 22nd, and it's still WE. This journal is too slow. I'm in a hurry for awards and honors, it's not suitable to invest in this.

misshp 2023-08-02

Wait, 2-3 months is quite normal.

铁瓜 2023-08-02

Too slow, it's frustrating. I asked other teams and they said it takes at least two months to submit for review...

CSUer-GH 2023-07-30

7.21 submitted
7.22 with editor
7.30 deadline and still not submitted for review

misshp 2023-07-28

The editor said that there are too many manuscripts in hand and there are still many that haven't been processed, so they need to be queued.

铁瓜 2023-07-28

How should the editor reply when they say they need to wait? Can't they find any reviewers?

misshp 2023-07-26

I have urged the editor, but still need to wait. It is estimated that it will take another 1-2 months.

铁瓜 2023-07-23

Still is 7.11 with editor.

misshp 2023-07-22

How is the status of your manuscript now? Mine has not changed.

0n1y 2023-07-17

I submitted it on June 5th, and it was just sent for review on July 17th. It's too slow...

铁瓜 2023-07-17

The translation of the text into English is: "The time it took for both of us to change our status was almost the same... It is still not under review, too slow... 6.15 submitted, 6.17 with editor, 7.11 with editor."

misshp 2023-07-13

6.25 submitted
6.27 with editor
7.11 with editor
Oh, it's so slow. When can it be reviewed?

铁瓜 2023-07-12

The submission at 06:15 has not been reviewed yet. So slow.

北街浊酒 2023-07-10

2023.06.19 The submission has been sent for review.

boyce-刘 2023-07-07

I submitted it on April 28th, but there has been no progress. I plan to remind them.

yanruolanyi 2023-07-07

The English translation of the text is: "The article I submitted on May 3rd is still 'With editor'."

lxm-boyce 2023-06-25

"The speed is really slow. It has been 2 months since I submitted, and it is still with the editor."

姑苏一坛雪 2023-06-21

It has been a month since I submitted it, but it is still with the editor. A few days ago, I urged the editor and they said I still need to wait. It is really too slow.

想退学的展博 2023-06-14

6-14-under review

想退学的展博 2023-06-10

Recently, on June 5th, the time changed once. It should have been dealt with, either by editing refusal or by inviting reviewers.

李!!! 2023-06-10

I have also been submitting for two months, always with the editor, and the dates have changed twice.

想退学的展博 2023-06-08

It has been exactly two months since submission, but still with the editor...... painfully slow to the point of frustration.

Mr Rong 2023-05-05

20230505 accept Thank you to the editor-in-chief and all the reviewers.

LXu 2023-04-27

Humble hope for a smooth review!

Letpublish 2023-04-25

Received in less than 5 months, the first draft was still good. It was revised once during the process, thanks to Editor Mattos.

Mr Rong 2023-04-20

20230418With Editor, thank you to the editor and all the reviewers for giving me this opportunity. The suggestions were also very professional, and I hope to successfully meet them.

云云云 2023-04-20

So fast, congratulations!

Mr Rong 2023-04-20

Thank you very much for the journal.

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started