风之痕 2023-01-09

2022.11.27 submitted
2022.11.29 with editor
2022.12.02 under review
2022.12.19 R1: minor revision
2023.01.02 resubmitted
2023.01.03 under review
2023.01.07 R2
2023.01.08 resubmitted
2023.01.08 completely accepted
2023.01.09 online

Translation:

2022.11.27 submitted
2022.11.29 with editor
2022.12.02 under review
2022.12.19 R1: minor revision
2023.01.02 resubmitted
2023.01.03 under review
2023.01.07 R2
2023.01.08 resubmitted
2023.01.08 completely accepted
2023.01.09 online

小呆呆 2022-12-20

I submitted it on October 30th, and it has been almost two months. It is still under review. How come others are so fast but mine is so slow? It's frustrating.

gongbingran 2022-08-05

Just refer to the latest received articles.

喜欢徘徊的蜗牛 2022-07-28

Hello, how did you find the reference format when you submitted it?

gongbingran 2022-05-26

Submission: April 14th
Review: April 20th
First review comments: May 2nd, both reviewers provided positive and professional feedback, and the editor allowed three weeks for revisions.
Response to first review comments: May 17th
Acceptance: May 26th.
Accepted before graduation, it was a smooth and quick submission. Thank you to the editor and reviewers for their recognition. Best wishes for the continued success of the journal!

keyan 2021-12-31

There has never been a need for a reason. What matters is the thrill of playing. This year, from Zone 1 to Zone 3, and next year, from Zone 3 to Zone 1. You won't be able to guess.

脚踏实地 2021-12-20

Give me a reason to drop to Zone 3. What's going on with the upgraded version of MMP? Or, you can give me the criteria for Zone classification. Is it similar to the basic version with a threshold or something?

ZHR789 2021-12-03

What was the final result? How many days did you wait for the review?

ZHR789 2021-11-27

May I ask about the submission? This journal supports data sharing and has adopted an Expects Data Sharing policy. Does this mean that original data should be uploaded?

记录投稿经历 2021-09-30

Submitted on September 26th.
With editor on September 27th.
Now it's September 30th, still with editor...
I see others submitting for review the next day... I've been waiting for several days... I feel... Could it be rejected again and not submitted? ε(┬┬﹏┬┬)3

123hh 2021-08-28

Very quickly, the reviewer returned the revised manuscript in just over ten days, giving two weeks to make modifications, with one major revision and one minor revision. After replying, the manuscript was accepted within two days, the speed was very fast. I am very grateful to the reviewer and editor for their recognition of the article, and I appreciate the highly efficient journal.

mwy888 2021-08-14

Because I also gained experience from reading the content on this. I would like to share it with everyone.
Submission: June 9, 2021
Second day: Under review
Received review comments: June 29, 2021 (both reviewers approved our work and gave us three weeks' time)
Revised manuscript: July 18, 2021
Accepted: July 29, 2021 (already accepted, just some minor issues to be addressed)
Online publication: August 8, 2021

fmszu 2021-05-18

The review process was extremely careless, with only one non-expert reviewer assigned. The reviewer's comments were not professional, and they forced the inclusion of irrelevant data and citations. The Editor rejected the paper and requested revisions. After making the suggested changes, the reviewer said it was fine but recommended submitting to ChemPhyChem instead. However, the paper was rejected again. In summary, the Editor provided prompt feedback but showed a lack of responsibility.

513036535 2021-01-16

Posted on November 29th, returned for revision on December 10th, reviewed by three reviewers. Two reviewers mentioned minor issues, while the other one requested additional experiments. Returned on December 14th and accepted on December 28th. Very fast!