cata123 2023-07-25

Submitted to acceptance, just over 2 and a half months.
Under review after 22 days (actually, it's normal for it to be with the editor within a month, so don't rush).
The review process was very fast, with two reviewers completing it in about 20 days.
After revisions, both reviewers completed the second evaluation and displayed RRC within one day.
However, the editor took about 20 more days to handle it, probably because they were busy.
Overall, I am very grateful to the editor and the reviewers.

accu 2023-07-20

The review process is quite slow, but the review comments are really professional, and I can learn a lot from them.

NCU 2023-07-18

5.16 Submission
6.8 Receive two review comments
7.3 Submit revised manuscript
7.17 Acceptance
A smooth submission experience that lasted for two months!

寒江孤雁 2023-06-26

Previously, it used to be within a week for either acceptance or rejection. Now it has been half a month and still no news. I submitted the manuscript on June 12th, and it was handled by the editor on the 13th. After that, there has been no further update. Carbon's processing speed has slowed down now, and there must be a reason for it to drop to Zone 2!

Anonymous 2023-06-25

2023.6.14 submitted
2023.6.15 with editor
Too slow... It has been 10 days and still no news.

邓阿喵 2023-06-10

2023.6.6 Submit to Journal
2023.6.6 With editor
2023.6.10 With editor

cata123 2023-05-26

No need to rush, I only submitted for review 21 days later last time. The homepage stated that the first decision takes 2.2 weeks. I suggest reminding them only if it exceeds 30 days.

Asir 2023-05-26

It has been 20 days since submission, and it is still "with editor". Is this normal? Should I remind them?

gddifcjbdsjov 2023-05-24

4.12 submitted
4.15 with editor
4.17 under review
5.4 revision
5.17 under review
5.21 accept
Both reviewers provided professional feedback, suggesting minor revisions. The speed of the editor and reviewers was extremely fast. I highly recommend them.

Dr. g 2023-05-22

"I highly approve of the first four levels."

YUWEN JUN 2023-05-15

Thank you to Professor Cao Maosheng from Beijing Institute of Technology for his efficiency and rigor. The efficiency of submitting and revising the article is high. The reviewing experts are very professional and provide constructive feedback.

30th March, submitted.
8th April, major revision.
12th May, minor revision.
13th May, accepted.

花柳朵 2023-04-08

It will return sooner or later.

花柳朵 2023-04-08

The influence is still significant.

花柳朵 2023-04-08

I don't know if he is an academician or not, but CEJ and CARBON are pretty good. As for CC, it's far behind in membrane science.

Nancy7 2023-03-17

2023.2.22 Submitted
2023.2.23 With editor
2023.2.28 Under review
2023.3.12 Required Reviews Completed
2023.3.15 Required Reviews Completed
2023.3.15 Under review
2023.3.16 Required Reviews Completed

After receiving the feedback, it went back to "under review", but the next day it went back to "required reviews completed". What is going on?

The third reviewer replied in one day? Not a good sign...
Is it possible that the third reviewer is an associate editor or something similar?

权威 2023-03-17

My situation is also like this.

Xiaoxiao0820 2023-03-09

Posted on November 15, 2022
Rejected on November 24, 2022

Chinesedragon 2023-03-08

2023-03-03 Submission, same day with editor.

fdfg 2023-03-01

Which editor are you?

@songkefan 2023-02-28

I have been waiting for more than ten days since submitting to the editor, but there has been no response. Yesterday, the date was updated briefly. Does anyone know what's going on? Does this mean it's not going to happen?

double22 2023-02-20

I feel the same as you, it seems like the journal is not being operated. There has been no news for over six months, and they don't even respond to manuscript reminders.

fdfg 2023-02-13

In the past three months of the first review, there were a total of 14 comments, including both minor and major revisions. The revised manuscript was sent back on November 18th, and it wasn't until December 11th that it changed to "under review." Then, at the end of December, one reviewer completed the review, but there has been no news since then. There has been no response to the reminders, so I contacted the journal manager. The journal manager replied to my email and suggested contacting the editor-in-chief and associate editor. However, there has been no further communication. It has been six and a half months since submission, which is an unusually long duration. Does anyone know what to do in this situation?

浪浪山打工仔122 2023-01-22

During the Chinese New Year, with nothing to do, I reviewed the performance assessment standards of numerous 985 universities and summarized the classification of current material and chemistry journals. The ranking of each journal in each category is not in any particular order, strongly challenging the classification system of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

1. Nature, Science (top-tier journals)
2. Nature sub-journals, a few sub-journals of Science (sub-journals)
3. Joule, Matter, Chem, JACS, Angew, PNAS, AM, Small NC, SA, National Science Review (top industry journals)
4. ACS Nano, ACS Energy Letters, ACS Materials Letters, CM, Nano Letters, AFM, AEM, AS, Cell Reports Physical Science, Nano Energy, energy storage materials, EES, science bulletin, materials today, Chemical Science, etc. (well-known industry journals)
5. Carbon, JMCA, ACS AMI, JPS, CC, CEJ, Journal of membrane science, Small, etc. (renowned journals in the field)

wu 2023-01-19

2023.01.17 Resubmission
2023.01.19 Under Review

啥啥你说啥 2022-12-29

In the field of carbon materials itself, after a lot of hard work, I finally managed to get a paper published, but it ended up being classified as a second-tier publication by the Chinese Academy of Sciences... Feeling upset...

YSC 2022-12-15

It's already 12:15 and nothing has changed.

wu 2022-12-15

2022.11.28 Resubmission
2022.12.12 Required Reviews Completed

YSC 2022-12-12

11.9 Half an hour after submission with editor
11.14 The date changed, but still with editor, under review on the same day
As of today, 12.12, there has been no change.

wu 2022-11-28

11.27 reject, because the format is not adjusted properly. It should follow the order of introduction/method/results discussion/conclusion, and also the reference format. Everyone, please take a careful look at the submission guidelines. I will continue to submit to them after fixing the format today.

xyzh 2022-11-28

Brother, what's your current situation?