池塘 2023-04-26

Stuck at the "Review Finished" stage, not sure how long to wait, does anyone know?

Qwe 2023-04-23

I've been stuck on the last step of technical checks for a long time. It's been said that they have been rejecting submissions like crazy recently. Does anyone know anything about it?

白设计 2023-03-22

Is the publication on hold?

李佳涵 2023-03-18

I would like to know if it's normal that half a month has passed since submission and the article has not been assigned to an editor yet?

fu_cccc 2022-06-28

The text translates to: "I submitted it on April 19th, and it is still in the editing and distribution status. I don't know what's going on."

jst874406515 2022-06-09

How fast is Duoduo fast? I have also assigned an editor now, but it has always been in the status of editorial assignment and has not entered independent review. I wanted to ask how long it took for you to enter the next stage?

一个就好 2022-06-03

After submitting, the editor was assigned on the second day, and quickly returned with a reviewer's opinion. Currently, waiting for opinions from other reviewers, unsure if this situation is normal.

jst874406515 2022-05-23

Hello, I would like to ask how long the duration of the Editorial Assignment phase and subsequent phases is. Thank you.

风风 2022-05-23

The submission went smoothly, and the editor was responsible. It took three months from submission to publication, which is relatively fast. Afterwards, I was also invited to serve as a guest editor for the journal. If you have any questions, you can consult me at jhpubliceco@hotmail.com.

feiyanhuo 2022-05-10

Has anyone submitted to this journal before? How long does it typically take to receive a response?

fxy0318 2021-10-29

The submission experience was very good. The editor was assigned on the second day of submission and it was quickly sent for review. The review process was conducted in a forum-style where the reviewers could reply to each other's comments. Both reviewers suggested major revisions after their initial feedback, and after two rounds of modifications, they recommended acceptance. The editor raised some additional questions, and after three more rounds of revisions, the submission was accepted. The editor's response was very prompt, and the revision suggestions made by the reviewers were constructive and detailed. After the changes were made, the quality of the article indeed improved significantly. Apart from the cost, all other experiences were very good.