认证评论 - Horticulturae
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

快发论文1 2023-02-11

The process flow for rejecting submissions should have changed.

没有昵称白问了 2023-02-11

The overall process was fast. It took a year in between.
Submission Received 20 December 2022
Major Revisions 31 January 2023
Submission Revision Date 07 February 2023
Accepted 10 February 2023

There was a 7-day period for major revisions.
It was my first SCI (Science Citation Index) paper, with some difficulties along the way. Fortunately, the result was good.

cloud_m 2022-10-29

Hello, since you are related to computer information, may I ask if the submission requires providing source code?

whistle 2022-08-08

6.23 Submission
7.20 Major revision
7.30 Revised
8.4 Minor revision
8.5 Revised
8.8 Accepted
The first SCI paper was written with some difficulties, but fortunately accepted.

zmxty 2022-07-19

Overall, it is still quite fast, taking 36 days. It went through two rounds of review in total, one major revision and one minor revision.

easy-SCI 2022-04-20

Received and accepted, within a month overall, the speed is fast, and the editor's modifications to the article are meticulous.

北词 2022-03-08

This journal seems to be organized by the Wuhan Botanical Garden of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. It is unlikely that they are not aware of the articles in their own system, so they probably need to accept more good articles.

WALNUTS JIN 2022-02-07

25 days later, after a minor repair, it is online. The editor is very responsible, and peer review is also very prompt.

lower 2022-01-08

Hello, the external review will start a few days after you submit your contribution.

桃酥 2021-12-20

The latest version of the Chinese Academy of Sciences' classification system divides journals into three zones.

尽余欢 2021-12-16

13 days after submission, the first review feedback required major revisions and requested additional experiments. However, only 7 days were given for the revisions. An extension was requested to the editor for 14 days, and the revised version was uploaded 1 day later. After the second review, the reviewer highly appreciated the additional content, and the paper was accepted 4 days later.

Overall, the journal has a relatively high level of articles, and some of them are quite innovative. However, there are few submissions from Chinese researchers.

zm27 2021-12-04

After submission, minor revisions were requested and accepted directly after modification, very quickly. The overall time was within one month. It seems like the Chinese Academy of Sciences does not recognize this journal, and it is unclear when it will be recognized.

瑜鲸暢颺 2021-11-30

The first review comments were given 17 days after submission, with major revisions required. After the revisions were made, it took 5 days for acceptance and the article was published online the day after acceptance. Overall, the process was fast and the review comments were also quite good.

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started