刘宏利 2022-06-19

Are there any better journals? Can you recommend some? I just got rejected as well. Please recommend.

peipeipeiper 2022-04-26

I have been submitting for eight months, revised three times and sent for review three times. Each time I had to resubmit after revisions, and the reviewers were different each time. The last time I submitted after minor revisions, it was rejected. Two reviewers said my innovation was not enough. The editor Zhanhu Guo also apologized for taking such a long time and still rejecting it. The difficulty of submitting has increased after the impact factor went up. This journal really knows how to operate!

茂密森林 2022-04-26

The review process is very long and cumbersome, and after the revision, it needs to be reviewed again. After the second revision, I had to wait for a long time.

Z_Wang Nano 2022-04-24

Rejected by AFM, also rejected by JMCA. After seeing the high impact factor, I decided to submit here as recommended by my teacher. I feel that the editor-in-chief is relatively objective and the processing speed is not slow. There were three expert reviewers, and their opinions were quite fair. The article emphasizes novelty and performance comparison with similar articles. There were 10 pages of comments and replies. During the process, I added two scanning electron microscope images showing the distribution of nanoparticles. It took about three months in total, but fortunately, it was accepted for publication smoothly.

xiao一 2022-04-11

Agreed, absolutely disgusting.

xiao一 2022-04-11

It is really a journal that leaves people speechless. It took one month to submit for review, one month for the review process, with 5-6 reviewers providing 20-30 review comments. I received nearly 10,000 words of review comments. During this period, I also supplemented the experimental data with simulated data. It took two weeks to return the review comments, and I was given minor revisions and corrections. The editor said that once this issue was resolved, the paper would be accepted. However, one reviewer raised a very inexplicable question. I explained the principles of the tests conducted in this field and the relevant applications of the materials used. However, two weeks later, they directly rejected the paper. I really don't know how to explain an objective fact. Please tell me, editor. I wasted four months of time, and it may have affected the impact factor. They no longer value our paper, and I will never submit to them again. Speechless...

hygge1206 2022-03-28

Will there be any impact if the PDF format generated after submission is incorrect?

wx20061118 2022-03-26

This magazine is very disgusting, with slow processing speed. I submitted an article and received feedback from two reviewers, which was relatively mild and did not include rejection comments. However, the editor directly rejected it and then said they welcome resubmission. After carefully revising and resubmitting, they completely ignored it and rejected it again, citing lack of innovation as the reason, without considering the previous reviewer comments and revisions. It is very irresponsible and a waste of a lot of your time. I strongly discourage submitting to this magazine.

SCI_Paper 2022-03-24

The impact factor of this journal has increased, with a strong emphasis on hot materials such as graphene, nanotubes, MXene, etc. It will become even more difficult in the future...

xiao一 2022-03-09

How did you upload your review comments? If there is no link to upload a Word document, what should be done with the pictures in the review comments?

投稿中 2022-03-07

Hello, how is your article? Is the next status under "New Submission" with the editor? How long have you been "with editor"? It has been 20 days since you submitted, and it has been in the "New Submission" status the whole time. Is this normal? Is this journal slow? Should you send an email to ask the editor?

投稿中 2022-03-07

Hello, may I ask if the status of "New Submission" remains unchanged from the time the journal is submitted until the results are given? It has been 20 days since I submitted my manuscript, and it has been in this "New Submission" status the whole time. Is this normal? Is this journal known for being slow? Should I send an email to inquire with the editor?

投文章难 2022-03-07

May I ask how long it takes to get the results after completing the review?

小生繁华 2022-03-07

The text translates to: "Submitted on 2.2, received feedback on 3.6, with a total of 3 reviewers. Two reviewers provided constructive suggestions for minor revisions, while the third reviewer believed it would be more suitable for a computational materials journal. As a result, the editor rejected my submission. It feels bad. How did the editor make that judgment?"

阿胜 2022-02-24

The speed is too slow... It takes more than 20 days just in the hands of the editor.

导电热塑 2022-01-23

I also didn't see the upload location for the cover letter. Did you solve it?

weixiaokai 2021-12-20

Need cover letter

qqzz 2021-12-05

Hello, I would like to ask if your situation has changed? How long has it been changed?

peipeipeiper 2021-11-23

The author ranking order of this journal must be exactly the same as the order of submission, otherwise it will be rejected. The graphic summary should also be a summary of twenty words.

peipeipeiper 2021-11-23

No need, I didn't see this option either. Just need a text summary.

Omar.Yaghi 2021-11-20

2021.11.20 New Submission (By the way, does this journal not require a Cover letter and other documents to be submitted?)

一区top* 2021-10-21

Hello, can I ask all the contributors, my submission has gone from "New submission" to "Editor assigned" and then to "Editor invited". Is it the same for you when submitting to this journal?

一区top* 2021-10-09

Excuse me, will the status change after submitting the paper, and what are the different types of status?