郑小钱 2023-04-01

I have previously submitted to this publication and it was left in the editor's hands for a month without being reviewed. There was no valid reason given for the rejection. I feel that it is a rogue journal and do not recommend submitting to it, as it would be a waste of time!

网志 2023-03-30

I thought I could work on weekends too, but it turns out weekends are almost equivalent to five days.

网志 2023-03-30

Three days later, on the second day, it was sent back for formatting revisions. On the third day, it was approved and sent for external review promptly.

wdwzdjs 2023-03-29

How long does the initial technical review take?

zhuimengren 2023-03-28

This journal is too slow, repeatedly assigning editors. I must escape, no progress after submitting for two months, neither rejected nor sent for review.

wdwzdjs 2023-03-28

How long does the initial technical review take?

网志 2023-03-22

The response is very fast, as long as the technical review is passed, the external audit speed is very fast.

网志 2023-03-21

How long does the technical review take? It has been reviewed for four days.

一飞冲天 2023-03-19

For those in the field of composite materials, after submitting the manuscript, it was quickly processed for review after passing the technical review. It took over two months and went through two rounds of revisions. Three reviewers raised nearly 30 questions, which were very professional and greatly helped improve our paper. The quality was significantly enhanced after the modifications. We are grateful to the professional reviewers and the responsible editorial team for their meticulous certification. We hope the journal will continue to improve.

网志 2023-03-19

I couldn't find it either. I wrote it according to the guidelines, no need for double columns.

小太阳lym 2023-03-14

Excuse me, where can I find the format of this journal?

帅帅扶 2023-03-03

Same question, couldn't find the Word template.

九制杨梅 2023-02-23

Quick escape! The submission has been rejected after more than twenty days, without being reviewed. The editor-in-chief's words were very tactful, suggesting to submit elsewhere. They promised to send a link for resubmission within 48 hours, but there was no response at all. They act all high and mighty with their high impact factor, but they could have rejected it earlier if they didn't think it was good enough. It's a waste of time, better not submit it.

九制杨梅 2023-02-20

The email sent to the corresponding author contains a link to check the status. You can ask the boss about it.

Asir 2023-02-20

Why can't I see the status or uploaded articles in the new submission website? I feel confused about the new submission process. I don't even know how to contact the editor to withdraw my submission. This journal seems to be a waste...

九制杨梅 2023-02-19

It's really, really, really slow. It has been over twenty days and it's still "editor appointed". The teacher asked me if I had already submitted the article for review... If they don't like it, they should reject it quickly, or if they do, they should review it quickly. If this continues, our reputation will be ruined.

Asir 2023-02-19

Excuse me, why can't I see the manuscript modification location on the new submission website of this journal? I also don't know where to upload the modified manuscript from. It's so confusing!

阿倪蛋糕店 2023-02-16

The article is a summary-type submission, submitted in early November, underwent four minor revisions during the process, accepted in mid-December, and published at the end of December. Overall, the speed was acceptable.

However, I have to complain about the formatting modifications in the early stages. I had to make changes three times, and it felt like pulling teeth. Each time, only one or two issues were pointed out for modification, which was extremely frustrating. The most disgusting part was that during the formatting review, the references were required to be arranged alphabetically by the author's name, but during later content modifications, they had to be arranged numerically. I personally suspect that the formatting and content review staff did not coordinate their information at all. I hope fellow authors intending to submit to this journal take note of this!

baicaiya 2023-01-30

I would like to ask what is the status after the editor appointment, does it mean that it has not been submitted for review yet?

dabinghh 2023-01-13

The review process is a bit slow, but the outcome is good. It's my first article in 23 years, a small gift for the new year.

依依归来 2022-12-21

The disgusting level of domestic journals has been witnessed. I submitted my article in November, and in early December, the editor asked me to resubmit the references in alphabetical order (the first time I encountered such a requirement). After I resubmitted for the second time, there was no update for 20 days. Today, the decision came out and it was rejected. The reason for rejection was surprisingly stated as "incorrect reference arrangement." I don't know if there was a change in editors. I am truly angry and amused at the same time. Originally, I wanted to argue, but then I thought it's better not to. As our advisor said, arguing with scoundrels only lowers oneself's status.

cheerresearch 2022-12-19

How is your thesis coming along?

cheerresearch 2022-12-19

What's the follow-up? Is there any result yet?

FWZ 2022-12-14

How long does it take for you to review it?

杨若林 2022-12-09

The journal feels quite good, and the review comments are also very good. Finally, the article has improved a lot in terms of quality. The journal has high requirements for the writing style and novelty of the articles, and I hope it continues to get better and better!!!

0.0 2022-11-22

The recommended journal by my mentor, I checked for related information about this journal at that time and also read some articles in it. The impact factor of the articles in the second quartile is relatively high, and the quality of the articles is also quite good. I thought of submitting my paper here, considering it as the first article to try it out, and unexpectedly it went quite smoothly. I submitted the manuscript at the end of August 2022, made two revisions in the process, and the handling speed was acceptable. There were three reviewers, with two minor revisions, and one reviewer suggested adding more comparative analysis of composite material properties. The journal particularly emphasizes novelty and impact. It took more than three months from initial submission to final acceptance, but finally, it got published! Personally, I feel that the editor-in-chief places special emphasis on the novelty and impact of the articles. The introduction section specifically emphasizes contributions in the field of composite materials, and the results and discussions also have a special requirement for contributions in composite materials.

zero 2022-11-02

This journal is really, really, really slow.
Submission on October 13
Editor appointment on November 2.

电催化 2022-09-22

Hello, may I ask if the manuscript needs to be formatted into two columns when submitting? I couldn't find a Word template for submissions, but I noticed that the published papers are all in two-column format.

半π 2022-08-28

I encountered a similar situation in Chem Eng J, where the editor asked for the addition of animal experiments. After fulfilling the animal experiment requirements, the problem was completely resolved, but it was still rejected. It feels a bit nauseating, as the manuscript was left there and I didn't feel like dealing with it.

energy storage 2022-07-15

Both composites part A and B are good, and the speed is also very fast.