认证评论 - Materials Today Chemistry
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

dtyz11 2023-08-02

It has been a long time since the last cycle. We haven't been able to find reviewers for two months. We have already invited three rounds of 16 experts to review.

adan 2023-07-23

The review has been going on for two months now, and it's becoming unbearable.

a123812662 2023-07-21

This journal is really slow, it took three months for the review process, and it has been almost a month since I submitted the revised manuscript, but still no news. I'm getting impatient.

adan 2023-07-17

Friends, where did you see the progress? Over here, it's been two months and it still shows as "under review."

敷衍怎么演 2023-07-13

I haven't received the proofreading email for 10 days as well.

师傅 2023-07-11

I sent 9, 6 people reviewed, completed by 5 people, and received their review comments. The first time, 2 reviewers completed it, and then 4 more were added. Sigh.

xiuz 2023-07-11

It has been a month since submission for review. I have sent it to 14 reviewers, but only one has accepted and completed the review. Now I am anxiously waiting and don't know how many more reviewers I will need.

adan 2023-07-06

It has been under review for one and a half months!!!

师傅 2023-07-04

When did you submit it? How many reviewers? Approximately how many months has it been since the submission? How many times did you revise it?

师傅 2023-07-04

Take a close look at the email you received.

小奥雄 2023-07-04

I would like to ask how long it takes to receive the online acceptance? It has been half a month since I accepted, but I have not received the proofreading email yet.

adan 2023-07-04

How do you know how many people have been submitted for review? I see it constantly displaying "Under Review".

师傅 2023-07-03

Speechless, I have sent the manuscript to 6 reviewers. 4 of them have already responded with their comments, but the editor still hasn't made a decision. It has been 36 days already. Do they really need to wait for all 6 reviewers to provide their feedback before rejecting the submission? Is this process so absurd?

大雪坪 2023-07-03

I am too. Why is there no movement? It has been under review for a month.

adan 2023-06-27

It has been one month since it was submitted for review...

nini2020 2023-06-21

No page charges. This is a traditional journal.

网志 2023-06-19

It has been a week since it was submitted to the journal, but it hasn't reached the hands of the editor yet?

adan 2023-06-05

Does this journal have publication fees?

xuhanqi 2023-05-18

How long does it usually take to receive the proofreading? I have received it, but it has been more than 14 days and I still haven't received the proofreading. I am waiting to graduate.

xuhanqi 2023-05-05

May I ask, how long does it take from the completion of proofreading to going online?

xuhanqi 2023-05-02

Dalton's manuscript was rejected after a four-month review, but it was accepted for publication after being submitted elsewhere for only 27 days.

qq572020211 2023-04-14

Although the process was quite lengthy, I still successfully accepted it, and the reviewer was also very positive.

小陈 2023-03-14

The following text translates to English as: "It was submitted on January 5th, and RRC has been two months since then. The date has changed three times, and it is still RRC now. Does this mean we have to wait for a fourth reviewer or should we start over if the opinions of the previous three reviewers are not consistent? Does anyone know?"

少年与梦- 2023-03-09

2023.3.9 accept translates to "accept on March 9, 2023" in English.

少年与梦- 2023-03-08

2023.3.7 revisão enviada para a revista
2023.3.8 com o editor

少年与梦- 2023-03-08

2023.2.23 required reviews completed - The required reviews have been completed on February 23, 2023.
2023.3.4 required reviews completed - The required reviews have been completed on March 4, 2023.
2023.3.5 revise - Revision is required on March 5, 2023.

RW448ha 2023-03-05

The main delay was caused by the editor and finding reviewers, which took up too much time. Other processes were quite fast. After the revisions, the reviewers also acted promptly and completed the review in one night, directly agreeing to accept it.

RW448ha 2023-03-05

2022.11.02 Submitted to journal
2022.11.07 with editor
2022.12.01 Stayed with the editor for a month, sent a reminder letter on 12.01, under review the same night
2023.01.10 No reviewers were found during the month, reviewers agreed to review on 1.10
2023.02.05 Editor's comments received, two reviewers, a total of 16 comments
2023.02.20 Revision submitted to journal
2023.02.21 with editor
2023.02.24 Accepted

少年与梦- 2023-02-24

2023.2.23 is the deadline for completing the necessary reviews.

Slittle-pepper 2023-02-21

Submission on October 5, 2022. The review process lasted for three months. The first reviewer took one month, and it seemed like there were no reviewers afterwards, causing a long delay.

On January 20, 2023, the editor's comments were returned. Minor revisions were required, and both reviewers had positive feedback. One reviewer was particularly sharp and gave one month for revisions.

On February 7, 2023, a small amount of experimentation was added, and a significant amount of literature was reviewed. The revised manuscript was sent back for further comments.

On February 19, 2023, all three reviewers completed their evaluations, and the feedback was satisfactory.

On February 20, 2023, the editor accepted the manuscript directly.

Overall, the waiting process in between was really anxious. It took a long time to find reviewers during the first three months. In December, I couldn't resist and sent a reminder to the editor, but they didn't respond. Fortunately, it was ultimately accepted. Good luck to everyone!

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More