Wade 2023-07-26

Submission process:
March 2, 2023 Submitted to Journal
March 5, 2023 With Editor
March 10, 2023 Under Review
April 19, 2023 Major Revision, 4 reviewers, 42 comments
May 28, 2023 Resubmit the revised manuscript, Submitted to Journal
May 30, 2023 Under Review
June 20, 2023 Minor Revision, 1 reviewer, 8 comments
July 10, 2023 Resubmit the revised manuscript version 2.0, Submitted to Journal
July 12, 2023 Under Review
July 23, 2023 Accept

Translation:
March 2, 2023 Submitted to Journal
March 5, 2023 With Editor
March 10, 2023 Under Review
April 19, 2023 Major Revision, 4 reviewers, 42 comments
May 28, 2023 Resubmit the revised manuscript, Submitted to Journal
May 30, 2023 Under Review
June 20, 2023 Minor Revision, 1 reviewer, 8 comments
July 10, 2023 Resubmit the revised manuscript version 2.0, Submitted to Journal
July 12, 2023 Under Review
July 23, 2023 Accept

Gavin文 2023-07-24

How can this journal be included in the top journals? Please advise.

小思 2023-06-29

It must be a scam. This journal is good at doing these things, pulling young teachers from various universities to promote their journal.

GOS 2023-06-29

This person is probably a scammer. Haha.

职业矿工 2023-06-26

The most annoying thing is that plagiarism check always fails, and it's never a problem to submit to other journals for plagiarism check.

NPCplayer 2023-04-21

Dude, how many months have you been searching? I have searched for articles even later than his, and he hasn't even searched yet.

luyisi123456 2022-12-29

This journal is overall okay, but the impact factor is not high.

unlease 2022-12-22

Indeed, the level of manipulation is top-notch, recruiting so many young editors and assigning tasks to each individual to cite articles. In the past two years, they directly paid per article, which greatly damaged their reputation. It is like a mudslide in the academic community.

职业矿工 2022-11-14

What do you all think about whether minerals engineering will be considered in the top tier or the first tier of university rankings next year? Please give some suggestions for easy submission.

NPCplayer 2022-10-18

How long does it take for everyone to go online after accepting? I accepted more than two weeks ago and still haven't gone online...

琉璃aa 2022-07-11

I would like to inquire about how to urge manuscript submission for this journal.

aaqwea 2022-07-09

Spending money to buy references, everyone knows.

迪厅小王子 2022-07-07

This journal is hyped up, with a non-self-citation impact factor of only 3.5 and a self-citation rate of 20%. It will eventually be suppressed.

dsada 2022-06-28

Brother, your prediction is accurate. It seems like you have insider information.

dsada 2022-06-28

Brother, you're really awesome.

南方小镇 2022-06-28

It has been two months since the submission, and there has been no progress or any idea how to contact the editorial department, which is ridiculous.

凡大大 2022-06-13

Is this journal fee-based?

zzx1124 2022-05-17

The impact factor of this journal is estimated to surpass international mining this year, indicating that Chinese people have a strong ability to promote and accomplish KPI targets.

L123 2022-05-04

The journal's official website claims not to charge any fees to authors, but the actual cost turns out to be quite expensive. Within 8 pages, it costs 8000 RMB, and for each additional page, an extra 600-800 RMB is charged. Isn't this a rip-off?!!!!

MMM 2022-04-19

Idiot... sharp.

菜鸟+1 2022-04-17

Found an idiotic reviewer who knows nothing and made a bunch of senseless comments, while the opinions of the other two reviewers were passable. As a result, the editor rejected the submission, which is disappointing and regrettable for this journal.

学术界的美男子 2022-04-11

How long does it take to get the result after the first revision?

花虫虫 2022-04-08

My reviewer should not have changed, I can only infer from the decreasing number of revision comments in the second round of review that they have not found a new reviewer.

花虫虫 2022-04-08

I strongly disagree with your viewpoint. My article was accepted in March, and my mentor is just an ordinary professor without any titles such as academician or young scholar. However, it still impressed the editors and reviewers. Due to the delay at the end of the year, it took at least one month longer than usual, and the final result might be available within three months. Moreover, the quality of articles published in this journal has significantly improved in the past two years, and it can even be compared with top-tier journals in terms of quality. The authors of the published articles range from doctoral students to junior, intermediate, and senior titles, without a concentration of publications solely based on titles. The review process of the manuscripts is double-blind, and strict formatting and high quality requirements are imposed (with an initial rejection rate of 80%, but fast rejections are possible, see http://journal.cumt.edu.cn/info/1074/1725.htm). The review speed is also exceptionally fast (according to data from Elsevier's official website, https://journalinsights.elsevier.com/journals/2095-2686/review_speed). It is a rare and conscientious journal that prioritizes academic quality and professional efficiency.

keyanxiaobai123321 2022-04-08

When an article has 3-5 review comments, with only one rejection (and no substantial sharp rejection comments), how should the editorial department proceed? Should they reject the article based solely on one rejection conclusion, or should they consider the reasonableness of multiple specific comments and make a comprehensive evaluation? According to the editorial department, they receive nearly 1500 submissions each year, and the majority of the review experts' opinions are detailed and specific, with review conclusions tending to be consistent. Only a very small number of cases have the aforementioned situation. In order to make a more reasonable decision, the editorial department will supplement the review with the opinions of multiple parties, weighing the different perspectives. This responsible attitude of not indiscriminately rejecting an article deserves praise.

abaaba 2022-03-29

May I ask, will the second reviewer look for a new manuscript?

花虫虫 2022-03-22

I have worked hard on experiments for several months and finally received recognition from the journal and reviewers. I am very happy! Do not think that the journal will focus on the background, as long as you have absolute confidence in your work, the journal will definitely acknowledge it!

花虫虫 2022-03-22

Oct 18, 2021 Submission
Oct 22, 2021 With Editor
Oct 28, 2021 Under Review
Dec 12, 2021 Decision in Process
Dec 13, 2021 Revise (over 20 comments)
Dec 20, 2021 R1 Submissions
Dec 20, 2021 With Editor
Dec 29, 2021 Under Review
Jan 08, 2022 Decision in Process
Jan 13, 2022 Revise (three minor issues)
Jan 13, 2022 R2 Submissions
Jan 13, 2022 With Editor
Feb 08, 2022 Revise (not submitted, editor sent back: formatting issues + previous three minor issues)
Feb 08, 2022 R3 Submissions
Feb 18, 2022 Under Review
Mar 13, 2022 Decision in Process
Mar 14, 2022 Accept

发动机 2022-03-12

It is better not to submit to domestic journals without a background, as it would be a waste of emotions.

Rejected again 2022-02-07

I can't understand why, as an international journal, articles with rejection comments can still be accepted for publication. Even if a prominent scholar submits an article and it gets rejected multiple times, there is still a chance for major revisions. However, if it is an inexperienced researcher, even one rejection means no chance. This way, the impact factor and scores may increase, but the reputation will be damaged.