认证评论 - Cells
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

narzy 2023-06-28

It has dropped to 6 again.......... I have read the articles in this magazine, and the quality is only about 3-4 out of 10. The number of published articles has skyrocketed to several thousand per year. I expect it to continue to decline next year.

午离 2023-04-25

May I ask if computer vision combined with medicine can submit to this journal?

桔梗花 2023-04-24

The speed is really fast, and I have completed another article for graduation evaluation. It feels great! Those who have published in well-established journals are not as awesome as my experimental rubbish. Just thinking about it gets me excited.

renchaunru 2023-04-09

Speed is originally the advantage of MDPI journals. What more do we need from a Q2 journal with an impact factor of 7.7? The number of publications is also not very high, so we can go for it!

miss-u 2023-03-09

The speed is still fast, and the water is used to graduate.

shjwhg 2023-02-17

Is it necessary to have a high repetition rate for stapling a magazine?

shjwhg 2023-02-17

Is the repetition rate of this magazine high? I forgot to check for plagiarism before submitting, and after submission, I found a 29% similarity rate.

zzz 2023-02-16

Excuse me, has there been any recent submissions? I have been waiting for over 20 days, and my paper is still stuck in pending review. I am not sure why the journal is taking so long to process it.

Jamely 2023-02-07

The review was done quickly, but it was done meticulously. There were 10 main issues, and based on the review comments, we conducted additional experiments for over two months. The explanation of the research phenomenon has indeed delved deeper, with higher language requirements.

AB1125 2023-01-10

Cells is now the flagship journal of MDPI. We hope to maintain this momentum and continue to grow and strengthen!

AB1125 2023-01-10

The 6th floor was hit in the face so badly that it was almost unbearable to look at. "Cells" is now the flagship journal of MDPI, with an impact factor of 7.7, and it has developed well in all aspects.

gren 2022-10-09

The reviewer is very responsible, the editor is efficient, and the impact factor is steadily increasing. After major revisions, it was accepted for publication. Overall, it is quite good.

dielianhua654321 2022-08-15

2022/5/12 Manuscript submission
2022/5/23 First review completed: Suggested revisions and resubmission after rejection
2022/6/29 Manuscript resubmitted
2022/7/4 Second review completed: Minor revisions
2022/7/6 Second review revised
2022/7/7 Notification received
2022/7/11 Article published online
As the best journal under MDPI in terms of impact factor, Cells has a fast review speed, friendly editors, and responsible reviewers. The first review provided extensive revisions spanning over ten pages. I used MDPI's language editing service, which was satisfactory and cost-effective. Overall, the submission process went smoothly, and I hope Cells journal continues to improve!

任小肖 2022-01-20

You are purely being negative just for the sake of being negative. Their journal has a relatively short review period, only 1-2 weeks, as they themselves are the ones who review the articles. If the time is up and the article is not submitted, they will send reminder emails to the reviewers. This is a very good practice, and I suggest that all magazine publishers can learn from it.

飞翔的rapiggy 2021-11-05

The first paper in my life, after the first submission, the reviewer provided many sharp comments. After two major revisions and additional experiments, the third submission was accepted. Many people criticize MDPI and say the reviewer is not very competent. But personally, the reviewer I encountered was quite good. They raised questions that hit the sore spots, although it was painful, it gave the entire research a new direction. Then the editor was very dedicated, always urging or encouraging me to resubmit, which left me a bit stunned. In my impression, many editors have an attitude of whether they want to accept your submission or not, but this editor's actions made me, a novice, feel like I can fight 300 rounds. This is my most direct feeling. Overall, I am satisfied with my first experience.

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now