无敌小猪猪 2023-05-07

Submission Process:
Received: October 10, 2022
Revised: February 19, 2023
Accepted: March 20, 2023
Published: April 19, 2023

In terms of electrocatalysis, overall, it went quite smoothly, and the reviewers were very professional. This work took more than two years to be considered by Science and Nature, but later my supervisor directly submitted it to Chem along with the review comments and the article. Let's keep up the good work!!

langman 2023-03-15

What is the format modification for?

dataiyang 2022-12-13

Editorial suggestion to transfer to Chem Catalysis, I checked and found out that it is a sub-journal of Chem. I am unsure about its quality and whether it is suitable to transfer to.

xusiyu 2022-09-08

"Submit JACS angew tragedy Chem minor revision"

薛定谔猫 2022-08-27

Stop bragging, it is far superior to JACS or ANGEW. Chem is not on par with JACS or ANGEW. As far as I know, many chemistry, especially organic chemistry, research groups publish in Chem because they couldn't make it to JACS or ANGEW. Chem's impact factor and recognition are significantly lower than JACS or ANGEW. When it comes to selecting outstanding young scientists, apart from Science, Nature, and its subsidiaries, JACS or ANGEW are the top choices, and Chem is considered less prestigious.

chemwt 2021-07-10

Received 27 August 2020,
Revised 26 November 2020, (Three cycles for Revision)
Accepted 3 June 2021,
Available online 29 June 2021.

Overall, Chem is much more demanding than our previous articles such as JACS, ANGEWANDTE, Nat. Commun., both in terms of data and innovation requirements. Although our article went through a major revision and two minor revisions, and the three reviewers raised many questions, we have made significant improvements to the article by addressing these questions and modifying it accordingly. With an impact factor of 22.908, it is already close to Nat. Chem. Chem, keep up the good work, and if we have good research in the future, we will definitely submit again.