helloworld1 2023-07-18

The approximate word count of the content is around 4000.

helloworld1 2023-07-18

Experience of submission:
For the electrochemical mechanism, the journal requires high innovation. After 3 days, a deputy editor was assigned. After that, I received revision comments in 20 days (two major revisions, two weeks for each). Two days after the revisions, I received minor revisions for a small issue and graphic modifications (given two weeks). After completing the changes in 5 days, I submitted it. Finally, it took 5 days to be accepted. I really like the efficiency of this journal, which took a total of 47 days.

豆腐1111 2023-07-03

No, the number of images and the length of the article can be modified after receiving, and there will be no strict requirement for 2500.

豆腐1111 2023-07-03

No, after receiving it, we will suggest modifying the length of the article.

SCI 2023-05-23

May I ask if this journal requires a word count of 2500? Will my submission be rejected if it exceeds the limit?

csmkcnenk 2023-03-27

Excuse me, does this really require 2500 words?

lsweet 2023-03-06

Just wanted to ask the experts who have submitted their work, does the word count need to be within 2500 words? My submission was rejected by AM, so I want to resubmit it to this one.

明天早上吃啥啊 2022-05-07

May I ask if the original poster submitted letters? I saw in the guidelines that the word count should not exceed 2500. Is it really that few?

不读书的小胖 2021-11-07

The work on semiconductor metal charge transfer, first-time submission, submitted on July 28th. It was assigned after two days, and on August 18th, we received the comments from the first reviewer. There were two minor revisions, and the editor gave us two weeks to make the changes. In the meantime, the boss was busy, so I didn't have time to modify my response. Two weeks later, the editor reminded us to provide the modified response. Immediately, I worked with the boss to rephrase the response to the comments. It was sent back, and three days later, we were notified of acceptance. After acceptance, a scientific editor made grammar modifications, including changes to articles, abbreviations, compound words, and tenses. It was published online on September 10th.

gvohq 2021-10-08

Are you voting for the calculation aspect?

小晨啊 2021-09-09

Still reviewing the comments on the draft.

鹏仔 2021-05-27

Submitted on 4.17, received review comments around two weeks later on 5.3. There was a minor revision suggested and a recommendation to submit to JPCL (the reviewer believed there were calculation issues in the paper, but there were actually none). The editor had a good understanding of the article's content and suggested resubmission after rejection. Taking into account the opinions of both reviewers, the paper was carefully revised and its quality improved. After resubmission, on 5.23, the editor notified that it was directly accepted.

贪财好色 做个俗人 2021-05-17

Hello, I would like to ask if there will be email notifications for the submission and review of this journal?

你猜猜 2021-04-14

So, did you receive any emails afterwards? What happened? I also sent one but didn't receive any, and I'm getting worried.

明天早上吃啥啊 2021-03-14

Why didn't I receive a review email after submitting? The webpage status directly shows "under review". Has anyone else experienced this situation? ?

Arikia 2021-01-13

A job that took two years to complete, first submitted to EES and was rejected, then resubmitted to ACS Energy Lett. Overall, the journal has high requirements for the novelty of the paper. Minor revisions were requested 15 days after submission and returned after 2 weeks, but a reviewer raised new comments, requiring further revisions. After resubmission, the paper was finally accepted. The process from submission to acceptance took over two months.