njuhewei 2023-07-14

There are a total of 3 reviewers, with three rounds of revisions. In the first round, there were major revisions (two major and one minor). In the second round, there were minor revisions (one major, one minor, and one acceptance). In the third round, there were minor revisions (one minor and two acceptances). The paper was accepted and published after a total of 10 months. The review process for JGR-A is quite rigorous, with in-depth and meticulous questions raised, which indeed improved the quality of the paper. By responding well to the reviewers' comments, the paper will eventually be successfully published. Previously, I mainly published papers in JGR-B. This is the first time I have published a paper in JGR-A, and I feel very good about it. I will continue to publish papers in it in the future.

东半球浓眉哥 2023-03-16

Brother, you said "shedding skin" so vividly. I totally agree. Has this journal been published in Zone 1? I really can't believe the antics of the Document Information Center. How did they manage to turn some "low-quality journals" into top-tier and Zone 1? I'm speechless.

林宇艾 2022-12-15

There are three reviewers, one of whom is very strict. After three rounds of review, they still rejected it.

oceanair 2022-10-18

Each time I receive a new JGRA evaluation, I have a different feeling.

oceanair 2022-10-18

Agreed, there were four rounds of review, and the replies were longer than the article in the first two rounds. In the end, the article increased from 6000 to 8000 characters. The reviewers were all highly skilled and their opinions were very objective. Although the criticism was sharp and almost made me give up, I honestly replied to all the questions and the quality of the article improved significantly.

who are you 2022-06-30

Highly acclaimed journals within the field are more recognized than ordinary Tier 1 journals (please take a seat). My personal representative works have been published in JGR-A, and it always feels like a struggle to submit each time. Unfortunately, the impact factor is too low, which has diminished my desire to submit any papers for the past two years.

heyun 2022-04-24

Initial review process:
Revision Received; Under Review 2022-01-07
Waiting for Revision 2021-12-03
Decision Sent to Author 2021-12-03
Decision Made; With Staff for Review 2021-12-02
Decision Made; E-mail Confirmation Sent 2021-12-02
With Editor for Decision 2021-12-02
Associate Editor Review Started 2021-12-02
Under Review 2021-10-26
Monitoring Editor Assigned 2021-10-26
Editor Assigned 2021-10-25
Submitted 2021-10-25

After two rounds of minor revisions, it was accepted.

Climate 2022-02-20

The level of the nc articles is not necessarily higher than that of jgr. Most of the articles in the subsidiary journal focus on social impact, as for specific theories and fundamental knowledge, they are just average.

Julia_Zhu 2021-08-02

2021-07-21 08:55 Waiting for allocation of editor
2021-07-21 22:53 Editor has been assigned, waiting for allocation of associate editor
2021-07-27 01:43 Monitoring editor has been assigned, reviewing has started

oceanair 2021-04-22

October 2020 submission
December 2020 major revisions after the first review (encountered an expert who delayed giving feedback until the end, unrelated to the journal's speed)
Returned after revisions in February 2020
Minor revisions based on the second review in April 2020
Returned after revisions in April 2020
Accepted directly after the third review in April 2020
The journal is excellent, a top-tier publication. The feedback from the reviewers was very professional and indeed improved the quality of the article. It took two months for all the revisions. It was my first submission to JGRA, and the experience was great. I will continue to submit in the future, hoping for continued good luck.

sususuaccept 2021-01-13

Submitted in March 2019, the first review took three months with two reviewers providing major revisions. After resubmission, it was accepted directly three months later.