robot5555 2023-08-09

No, it is still early access. The proof has been a week already.

fei24 2023-08-09

I also re-invested at this time.

fei24 2023-08-09

I also reapplied during this time, but haven't received any news yet.

周小帅 2023-08-09

May I ask, after accepting, payment is due on 7.27. Early Access was released on 7.29, but I haven't received any proof until today. When can it be officially published?

allenxu 2023-08-09

Hello, may I ask if your paper is online? How long does it take to publish the final version after early access?

allenxu 2023-08-09

Hello, may I ask if your paper has been published online? After early access and proofreading, how long does it take to release the final version?

swz 2023-08-09

I feel that the review process has become slower recently. I resubmitted my rejected manuscript on July 26th, and it is still under review without any feedback until now.

TongIZR 2023-08-08

2023.5.30 submit
2023.6.2 under review
2023.6.13 Reject (updates required before resubmission)
2023.7.1 resubmit
2023.7.17 under review
2023.7.27 Reject (updates required before resubmission)
2023.7.31 resubmit
2023.8.4 under review
2023.8.8 accept
Overall, it was quite fast. The editorial department doesn't work on weekends, so it's better to submit on Mondays to save time.

zwz98 2023-08-08

Received the first review comments on August 8th (one rejection and two acceptances).

lagrange 2023-08-06

It has indeed become stricter. May I ask if a single Access paper is enough for some 211 and 985 master's graduates now?

swz 2023-08-06

Three times rejected and resubmitted, it's good if I get it. I have resubmitted for the second time and am still waiting for the result, hoping for good luck.·

雪满长安道 2023-08-05

It seems that ACCESS is now stricter in reviewing than before.

Chris PENG 2023-08-05

Is it so complicated now? Even with over 10,000 OA, spending money is still not fast.

雪满长安道 2023-08-05

23.3.31 First submission -- 23.4.23 Feedback from reviewers (both reviewers rejected but encouraged resubmission, suggested adding comparative experiments)
23.5.11 Second submission (revision) -- 23.6.06 Feedback from reviewers (three reviewers: Reviewer 1: Accept (minor edits), Reviewer 2: Accept (minor edits), Reviewer 3: Reject (updates required before resubmission). The first two reviewers praised our work, while the third reviewer provided many constructive suggestions)
23.6.27 Third submission (revision) -- 23.07.11 Feedback from reviewers (two reviewers: Reviewer 1: Accept (minor edits), Reviewer 2: Reject (updates required before resubmission). The second reviewer was the third reviewer from the previous review and pointed out that the paper still lacked verification and discussion of a certain experimental condition, which needed to be added to the paper)
23.7.21 Fourth submission (revision) -- 23.8.02 Acceptance
Mission accomplished!

TZS 2023-08-05

Is there anyone who can help solve the problem? After being hired, do all the authors need to confirm the author information confirmation link?

swz 2023-08-02

Admiration. The boss is really powerful.

Chris PENG 2023-08-02

The second trial is slower than the first trial. It has been almost a month since the second trial was submitted, but there is still no response.

XIxxxxxx HU 2023-08-02

5.1 First submission
6.20 First revision
7.1 Second submission
7.10 Second revision
7.15 Third submission
7.31 Accepted

孙局 2023-08-01

Do you want to know if there will be an email reminder for the second review submission? What kind of email will be sent? Is it the same as before? We have started the review process for your article, but wanted to mention the "2023 IEEE Access Best Video Award Part 1" which is detailed below.

allenxu 2023-08-01

4.25 Submission
6.26 Received first review result (Both are rejections: Suggested resubmission after modification)
6.27 Resubmitted
7.31 Received review result (Both are acceptances)
One reviewer asked me to cite some specific papers, but since I was not allowed to add new references after acceptance, I ignored it.

swz 2023-07-31

Rejected and resubmitted for the second time, I really can't handle it.

或许遗忘 2023-07-31

It depends on luck. Some reviewers may be more professional and have stricter requirements.

或许遗忘 2023-07-31

Approximately one month or so.

或许遗忘 2023-07-31

The following text translates to English as: "My first trial was submitted on May 14th, and the results were out in a month. The second trial was submitted on July 11th and was accepted on July 31st, quite fast."

或许遗忘 2023-07-31

Please send an email to the editor quickly, informing them that there was an error in the submission and requesting to resubmit. Otherwise, it will be difficult to withdraw the assigned reviewer.

或许遗忘 2023-07-31

Yes, send an email to the editor, stating that there was an error in the submission and requesting for it to be withdrawn and resubmitted.

或许遗忘 2023-07-31

Quickly contact the editor to return the manuscript and resubmit it.

swz 2023-07-30

Not all reviewers agree or can accept it.

lagrange 2023-07-30

Email the editor, stating that there was an error in the submission and request for resubmission.

孙局 2023-07-30

I want to ask the seniors, after I submitted the repair, I realized that I did not upload the supplementary materials with highlighted modifications. What should I do? Will it have any impact?