友情提示:以下期刊信息可能会有更新,仅供参考,请在投稿前自行登录期刊官网仔细核实。
期刊名
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
IEEE T NEUR NET LEAR
ISSN / eISSN
2162-237X / 2162-2388
目标和范围
The IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems publishes technical articles that deal with the theory, design, and applications of neural networks and related learning systems.
研究方向
计算机:硬件
计算机:理论方法
计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
21.90
查看趋势图
CiteScore 学科排名
类别 | 分区 | 排名 |
---|---|---|
Computer Science - Computer Science Applications | Q1 | #8/792 |
Computer Science - Computer Networks and Communications | Q1 | #5/379 |
Computer Science - Software | Q1 | #11/404 |
Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence | Q1 | #10/301 |
Web of Science 核心合集
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
---|---|
Indexed | - |
类别 (Journal Citation Reports 2023) | 分区 |
---|---|
COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE - SCIE | Q1 |
COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE - SCIE | Q1 |
COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS - SCIE | Q1 |
ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC - SCIE | Q1 |
H-index
180
出版国家或地区
UNITED STATES
出版商
IEEE Computational Intelligence Society
年文章数
1062
Open Access
NO
通讯方式
445 HOES LANE, PISCATAWAY, USA, NJ, 08855-4141
认证评论
Upon receiving the second review, the AE did not provide specific comments from the reviewers. They only mentioned that one reviewer was satisfied with the review, another suggested improving the grammar, and the opinion of the third reviewer was not mentioned. I assume that there were no major issues, otherwise, it would have been mentioned. The main reason for rejection was that one AE believed that the modifications made during the second review did not meet their expectations. They mentioned some optimization issues with the algorithm but did not elaborate further, leaving one feeling speechless. This submission result inevitably leaves one feeling somewhat resentful.
This is another discouraging submission experience. I can understand the rejection of my previous submission on Auto, as there were some shortcomings. One reviewer thoroughly reviewed the entire article and provided many excellent suggestions, stating that these issues could be resolved. Although it was ultimately rejected, the reasons for rejection were valid and helpful for improving the manuscript. However, this time, I am at a loss as to how to make improvements.
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreAdd your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload Now