友情提示：以下期刊信息可能会有更新，仅供参考，请在投稿前自行登录期刊官网仔细核实。
期刊名
MICRON
MICRON
ISSN / eISSN
0968-4328 / 1878-4291
目标和范围
Micron is an interdisciplinary forum for all work that involves new applications of microscopy or where advanced microscopy plays a central role. The journal will publish on the design, methods, application, practice or theory of microscopy and microanalysis, including reports on optical, electron-beam, X-ray microtomography, and scanning-probe systems. It also aims at the regular publication of review papers, short communications, as well as thematic issues on contemporary developments in microscopy and microanalysis. The journal embraces original research in which microscopy has contributed significantly to knowledge in biology, life science, nanoscience and nanotechnology, materials science and engineering.
研究方向
显微镜技术
CiteScore
4.30
查看趋势图
CiteScore 学科排名
| 类别 | 分区 | 排名 |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology - Structural Biology | Q3 | #29/45 |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology - Cell Biology | Q3 | #195/274 |
Web of Science 核心合集
| Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
|---|---|
| Indexed | - |
| 类别 (Journal Citation Reports 2023) | 分区 |
|---|---|
| MICROSCOPY - SCIE | Q2 |
H-index
75
出版国家或地区
ENGLAND
出版商
Elsevier Ltd
出版周期
Bimonthly
出版年份
1993
年文章数
96
Open Access
NO
通讯方式
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX5 1GB
认证评论
Review process:
First review, one rejection and one revision request, the editor requested major revisions.
Second review, one rejection and one acceptance, the editor rejected it.
The reasons for the two rejections are not clear. The reviewers who were rejected thought it was due to data errors (which were not explicitly mentioned in the first review, so the revisions were not made in a timely manner).
In fact, it was a misunderstanding and not a data error, but rather an overlap in the peak spectrum (I would like to explain). I don't really like the vague rejection style of the reviewers, it seems they just don't like this short article.
In the end, the editor rejected it and there was no chance to explain.
I submitted two articles before and had similar issues (one rejection and one acceptance). The reviewers who rejected it seemed to have a higher level of subjectivity.
It's a very good journal! I will submit again if I have good data.
9.21 with editor
9.22 under review
、、、During the waiting process, send an email to inquire on 1.22
1.23 minor revise
1.25 resubmitted to journal
1.25 accepted
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started