期刊名
LITHOS

LITHOS

ISSN / eISSN
0024-4937
目标和范围
Lithos publishes original research papers on the petrology, geochemistry and petrogenesis of igneous and metamorphic rocks. Papers on mineralogy/mineral physics related to petrology and petrogenetic problems are also welcomed.
研究方向

地球化学与地球物理

矿物学

CiteScore
6.70 查看趋势图
CiteScore 学科排名
类别 分区 排名
Earth and Planetary Sciences - Geology Q1 #32/284
Earth and Planetary Sciences - Geochemistry and Petrology Q1 #33/140
Web of Science 核心合集
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
类别 (Journal Citation Reports 2023) 分区
GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS - SCIE Q2
MINERALOGY - SCIE Q1
H-index
144
出版国家或地区
NORWAY
出版商
Elsevier
出版周期
Monthly
年文章数
310
Open Access
NO
通讯方式
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
认证评论
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。
Posted on May 9th.
On June 17th, the editorial department returned with comments. There were two reviewers, the first reviewer raised over ten questions, and the second reviewer had four questions. However, it was difficult to answer them, suspecting issues with the accuracy of our experiments. The editor provided major revisions objectively and gave us two months for the initial modifications.
On July 15th, we returned the first modified draft after carefully replying to and modifying each reviewer's questions upon receiving the notice for revisions. It took us a month.
On August 26th, the editorial department returned with comments. The first reviewer was satisfied with our responses and agreed to publish. However, the second reviewer still expressed dissatisfaction with the process of accuracy calculation. The editor provided appropriate modifications.
On September 1st, after a week of modifications, we provided detailed supplements to the accuracy calculation process in the paper and returned the second modified draft.
On September 9th, it was accepted.
Overall, the editor's handling speed was quite fast and not delayed. The reviewers' suggestions for our paper greatly helped improve it. Each review cycle took about a month and a half.
2021-09-10
2020.9.28 Submission
2020.11.4 Received review comments, one minor revision, one rejection, editor suggested major revision
2021.1.4 Responded seriously to the review comments and resubmitted
2021.2.14 Received second round of review comments, one acceptance, one rejection, editor suggested major revision
2021.4.14 Modified according to the first review comments, partially ignored the second comments, partially responded, partially disagreed
2021.4.27 Accepted
The second reviewer should have different views from ours, but the review comments were mixed with too much emotional sentiment. I was furious after reading the comments, so in the second round, I directly confronted the reviewer and complained to the editor why they didn't seek arbitration. As long as we have solid evidence, there is nothing to fear.
2021-05-06

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now