Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics

期刊名
Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics

J SYST ENG ELECTRON

ISSN / eISSN
1671-1793
目标和范围
Information not localized
研究方向

自动化与控制系统

工程:电子与电气

运筹学与管理科学

CiteScore
3.20 查看趋势图
CiteScore 学科排名
类别 分区 排名
Engineering - Control and Systems Engineering Q2 #136/286
Engineering - Computer Science Applications Q3 #399/792
Engineering - Electrical and Electronic Engineering Q3 #375/738
Web of Science 核心合集
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
类别 (Journal Citation Reports 2023) 分区
AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS - SCIE Q3
ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC - SCIE Q3
OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE - SCIE Q3
H-index
28
出版国家或地区
PEOPLES R CHINA
出版商
Science Press
出版周期
Quarterly
出版年份
1996
年文章数
136
Open Access
NO
通讯方式
SYSTEMS ENGINEERING & ELECTRONICS, EDITORIAL DEPT, PO BOX 142-32, BEIJING, PEOPLES R CHINA, 100854
认证评论
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。
I would like to briefly share my personal experience of submitting papers for reference:
Submitted on 16th March 22, and it was received and sent for review on the same day.
On 17th August 22, it showed that the reviewers had finished reviewing. During this period, there was no display of the review progress. I only saw that the editor had sent it to 5-8 reviewers. After reminding once, they said it was being reviewed, so I had to wait.
Rejected on 6th September 22. The opinions of the two reviewers are as follows:
Reviewer 1: The overall structure of the paper is good. The description of the basic knowledge section is redundant. The experimental and analytical parts of the manuscript lack clear control groups or other comparison indicators. Rejected. (Very vague opinion, did not point out where and what kind of control experiments and indicators are missing, not helpful for improving the paper, and also doubted whether the reviewer understood the author's experimental content)
Reviewer 2: The organization of the introduction is confusing, and the author should reorganize this part. The motivation and contribution of this work should be clarified and emphasized. Try to set the issues discussed in this paper more clearly and write a paragraph to define the problem. No decision on accepting/rejecting the manuscript was given. (Obviously, they didn't read my experiment and directly rejected it after reading the abstract and introduction)
In short, it took half a year for this journey, and what I got was two vague review opinions plus an editor's rejection. The experience was very bad. The email did not mention the possibility of appeal, so I assume that there is no way to appeal, and I am too lazy to argue with such reviewers.
I will not submit to this journal in the future.
2022-09-08
Before, when I submitted, it would be very quick. After submitting the revisions, it took about a month to be accepted. After submitting the publication fee, I received the acceptance letter within approximately a month (specific time is not clear). Several months later, the manuscript was proofread. It was published in the first quarter of this year, which took 3 to 4 months from submission to acceptance and one year from acceptance to publication. It can be considered relatively fast in terms of speed within the field of SCI.
2021-04-24

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started