友情提示:以下期刊信息可能会有更新,仅供参考,请在投稿前自行登录期刊官网仔细核实。
期刊名
Cell Reports Physical Science
ISSN / eISSN
2666-3864 / 2666-3864
研究方向
化学:综合
材料科学:综合
物理:综合
CiteScore
7.60
查看趋势图
CiteScore 学科排名
类别 | 分区 | 排名 |
---|---|---|
Engineering - General Engineering | Q1 | #31/302 |
Engineering - General Physics and Astronomy | Q1 | #33/240 |
Engineering - General Chemistry | Q1 | #73/407 |
Engineering - General Energy | Q1 | #15/71 |
Engineering - General Materials Science | Q1 | #95/453 |
Web of Science 核心合集
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
---|---|
Indexed | - |
类别 (Journal Citation Reports 2023) | 分区 |
---|---|
CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY - SCIE | Q1 |
ENERGY & FUELS - SCIE | Q1 |
MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY - SCIE | Q1 |
PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY - SCIE | Q1 |
出版国家或地区
United States
出版商
Elsevier
年文章数
423
Open Access
YES
认证评论
Regarding my submission, I initially submitted to Joule and went through two revisions before it was rejected. The editor of Cell Reports Physical Science sent me an email invitation to transfer my submission, expressing interest in the content of my paper and promising it would be 100% free. They also mentioned that the paper could be pre-accepted or at most sent back to one reviewer for a second review. However, the paper was directly sent back to the original three reviewers. After waiting for two months, the paper was accepted by the other reviewers, but one reviewer still had concerns and the editor rejected it directly.
Perhaps many people would think this is normal. I now realize that I was quite out of control at the time and felt pigeonholed. I couldn't help but react in the moment. I still need to continue cultivating my own mentality.
Rejected by Matter, it is suggested to submit to CRPS.
8.16 Transferred for submission.
9.21 Returned for major revisions, with four reviewers, three provided more positive feedback, and one had more negative feedback.
10.13 Revised and returned, with one round of re-review, during which the status alternated between "under review" and "reviewers complete."
11.9 Received feedback (pre-acceptance), the fourth reviewer rejected it, while the first three agreed to accept it. After considering the editor's opinion, it was given a pre-acceptance, but the issues raised by the fourth reviewer still need to be addressed. After formatting, it was returned on 11.17.
11.23 Accepted.
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started