IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles

期刊名
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles

ISSN / eISSN
2379-8858 / 2379-8858
研究方向

计算机:人工智能

工程:电子与电气

运输科技

CiteScore
11.80 查看趋势图
CiteScore 学科排名
类别 分区 排名
Mathematics - Control and Optimization Q1 #3/121
Mathematics - Automotive Engineering Q1 #6/115
Mathematics - Artificial Intelligence Q1 #36/301
Web of Science 核心合集
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
类别 (Journal Citation Reports 2023) 分区
COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE - SCIE Q1
ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC - SCIE Q1
TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY - SCIE Q1
出版商
IEEE
年文章数
74
Open Access
NO
认证评论
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。
I found that experience can only serve as a reference. This journal is really fast or slow. I submitted my paper in mid-April, and it has been under review for almost a month. It was just in the "under review" stage, and now it has changed to "A R A" (Immediate Reject). I have read other comments here and it's true, some papers get reviewed quickly while others experience different situations. In any case, it's better to wait a little longer before submitting, and not rush into it.

Maybe it's really due to disciplinary differences. I have a classmate majoring in communications who hasn't received the first review result even after a month of submission, and they are already complaining about the journal's inefficiency...

In the field of transportation and logistics, it's already efficient to have a paper reviewed within a month. I have seen journals like TRA, TRB, TRC have review periods ranging from one and a half to two years. My classmate finds it unbelievable. Sigh...

[3:00 PM, May 29th] EIC Immediate Reject (May 29, 2023)
2023-05-14
I'll also voice my opinion. The situation is essentially as described by the previous comments. My initial review comments were all positive, and the editor-in-chief suggested resubmitting the paper as a new submission, but with the condition that he agrees. So, after receiving his approval via email, I resubmitted it. However, the outcome of the resubmission was that it was rejected by the editorial department without any reason given and without undergoing external review. In simple terms, it seems to be a matter of personal bias, where the importance lies not in the review comments or the content of the article, but in the individuals involved in the review process.
2022-12-25

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started