Energy Sources Part A-Recovery Utilization and Environmental Effects

2022/11/14 Manuscript Submitted
2022/11/14 With Journal Administrator
2022/11/17 With Editor
2022/11/17 out for review, three reviewers, one of whom took a long time to accept the review.
2022/12/28 Decision pending, two major revisions and one minor revision, the editor gave the major revisions, four months' time.
2023/4/25 Revised Manuscript Submitted, due to personal reasons, it took more than three months to submit the revised version.
2023/5/3 Submission Returned to Author, the formatting editor asked to modify the classification of the reply letter, and it was returned to the journal the next day after modification.
2023/5/4 Manuscript Resubmitted
2023/5/4 With Journal Administrator
2023/5/10 With Editor
2023/5/10 out for review
2023/6/2 accepted
The academic editor is very fast, it usually takes him no more than three days, mainly depending on luck and when the reviewers can complete their reviews. The journal's quality is average and the difficulty is relatively low.

1. The review process was very fast, and it was completed in just over a month.
2. There is a high tolerance for language issues. The language problems in my initial draft were quite severe, but I was still given the opportunity for major revisions.
3. After completing the major revisions, I was asked to make minor revisions to reduce the weight of the paper. After making those revisions, it was accepted directly. The editing efficiency was high, and I appreciate that.
4. After acceptance, it takes a long time before the article is published online. At least, I haven't seen it online yet.
5. After the JCR partition update, the partition has significantly improved, surpassing the journal "Energy & Fuels" that rejected my paper twice in a row. Yesterday, "Energy & Fuels" ignored me, but today, they can't reach my level!