CHINESE JOURNAL OF OCEANOLOGY AND LIMNOLOGY

期刊名
CHINESE JOURNAL OF OCEANOLOGY AND LIMNOLOGY

CHIN J OCEANOL LIMN

ISSN / eISSN
0254-4059
研究方向

N/A

CiteScore
0.83 查看趋势图
CiteScore 学科排名
类别 分区 排名
Earth and Planetary Sciences - Oceanography - #66/115
Environmental Science - Water Science and Technology - #109/191
Web of Science 核心合集
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
- -
H-index
24
出版国家或地区
PEOPLES R CHINA
出版周期
Quarterly
出版年份
1982
Open Access
NO
通讯方式
SCIENCE CHINA PRESS, 16 DONGHUANGCHENGGEN NORTH ST, BEIJING, PEOPLES R CHINA, 100717
认证评论
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。
Posted on 2022.1.17, two reviewers were assigned.
Rejected on 2022.2.21.
The rejection reason was extremely weak. Both reviewers were completely unrelated to the field and their questions were like nonsense. They couldn't even understand the article. Even though I presented the results, they asked me, "Where is the basis for this conclusion?" The basis is in the results, damn it! They forcefully claimed that my article lacked logic, and the paid formatting and references were considered irregular. It's truly ridiculous!
I believe the rejection reason is unreasonable and I appeal.
Successful appeal on 2022.3.3, another review, this time with only one reviewer. Rejected again on 2022.4.2, reason being poor language.
Another reviewer who couldn't understand the article, couldn't provide any constructive questions, and finally used poorly constructed Chinglish to say my language was poor. I paid for proofreading, can you at least look at your own Chinglish before criticizing others' language in the article?
In short, it's a terrible journal. CIMS forcibly classified it as a second-tier journal, and I thought of supporting some domestic journals, but it turns out they are all crap. Later, I transferred my article to another journal, made minor revisions, and it was directly accepted. JOL can go to hell!
2023-04-07

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started