甜心 2023-04-04

In the field of environmental remote sensing, a paper that has been rejected or sent for review by three top journals was submitted to Applied Sciences-Basel.

3.23 received
3.23 under review
3.23 all authors sent confirmation emails
3.31 minor revisions requested in 5 days (8 days with three reviewers, all comments were professional, almost all were positive)
4.02 resubmitted
4.03 pending editor decision
4.04 accepted

Overall, it took 11 days from submission to acceptance, and the review process was completed in just one week, which was incredibly fast. The full name of the journal in the Web of Science is "Applied Sciences-Basel," but the MDPI website does not include the suffix "Basel" (a city in Switzerland). However, it is indeed the same journal, and everyone can find it by accessing the MDPI website.

clby 2023-04-02

It has been nearly 10 days, and it is still pending review. Isn't it a bit too slow?????

我要投十个 2023-03-28

Submitted on March 8th, major revision on March 16th, returned on March 22nd, major revision on March 23rd, returned on March 25th, accepted on March 27th.

Opinions from three reviewers: Reviewer 1 provided some constructive comments. After addressing each point in the revisions, they agreed to accept it in the second round. Reviewer 2 made some changes to the English expression in the abstract, but requested me to cite some articles. In the first round, I did not include any citations. In the second round, they pointed out that I forgot to include citations and even provided a literature review for those articles, asking me to add them. After discussing with the assistant editor, I only cited a few related articles and did not include the rest. In the third round, they agreed to accept it. Reviewer 3 had no comments and agreed to accept it directly in the first round.

I need to complain about Reviewer 2. The articles they provided were not related to the topic or theoretical methods of my paper at all, yet they insisted that I cite them. They even wrote a summary claiming that those articles had the same topic and methods as mine, asking me to directly copy from them. Are they speaking nonsense with their eyes closed?

Overall, it is well known that this journal is for buying a quick graduation approval.

L ee12 2023-03-28

May I ask if this journal requires the submission of source code?

午离 2023-03-24

I am also very worried, just paid the money, if I get kicked out, I won't be able to graduate.

kli 2023-03-23

I also just voted for it, just finished a minor repair, feeling complicated.

Whithney 2023-03-23

Is there a possibility that this journal will be removed from SCI? The number of articles published is quite large. Just two days ago, 35 journals were removed. I just submitted my paper here and I am a bit worried.

yipilibalacan 2023-03-22

May I ask if the OP submitted a special issue or a regular one? Would it have any impact if the corresponding author does not include the teacher?

天池守望者 2023-03-19

It's related to luck, depends on what kind of editors and reviewers you encounter.

天池守望者 2023-03-19

Has been audited externally, now it is in zone 4.

天池守望者 2023-03-19

Special issue is a call for papers on a specific topic, which will eventually be published separately. However, this special issue of the journal does not have an IS (Index of Science) identification in WOS (Web of Science), so it is not strictly considered a special issue in the strict sense.

MERCURY_AA32 2023-03-19

3.17 pending review

wangdeming 2023-03-19

Hahahahahaha, interesting.

Luke 2023-03-16

What does "special issue" mean?

赫尔佐格 2023-03-14

The translation of the text is as follows:

"I submitted it last year. The first trial took 4 months with 4 reviewers, 3 positive and 1 negative. There was this S b who clearly seemed inexperienced and gave shitty opinions. Really fucking annoying.

After the revisions, only that S b remained, with really low intelligence, still giving shitty opinions. This fucking thing. The editor rejected it. S B.

Then I asked the editor what this person's name was, and the editor said they protect the privacy of the reviewers. S b.

The anonymous review system is just fucking protecting a bunch of S b.

Ri, your mother, are you so great? Let me have the pleasure of reading your masterpiece.

Dog, what the fuck, are you trying to impress me?"

Sunny 2023-03-13

February 28, 2023 - Submit for review
March 09, 2023 - Minor revision
March 10, 2023 - Return for repair
March 10, 2023 - Final review
March 13, 2023 - Accepted

Sunny 2023-03-13

Graduation magazine, the speed of review, manuscript review, and editorial processing are all very fast.

Okita 2023-03-13

1/30 Initial draft
2/10 Major revision
2/17 Submission of revised draft
2/18 Minor revision
2/20 Submission of revised draft
2/27 Acceptance
3/4 Online

Without saying anything else, emphasize high efficiency.

L ee12 2023-03-08

May I ask if this journal requires open data sets and source code?

JeremyTian 2023-03-07

It's okay, I hope for a good outcome.

JeremyTian 2023-03-07

Thank you everyone, I have received the review comments. Fortunately, there was no significant delay.

丁海波 2023-03-06

Excuse me, which district is Applied Sciences in now?

yang98 2023-03-04

The text translates to: "Once pending, it has already been submitted for review until under. Have all the review comments been returned after so many days?"

伯涛 2023-02-28

This status should be under review, probably some reviewers are delaying and haven't finished reviewing yet. If you can, please wait a little longer. If you are really in a hurry, you can send an email to contact the assistant editor and inquire about the progress of the manuscript handling.

kwak 2023-02-27

Accepted at 12 o'clock noon on February 27th.

咸鱼会翻身 2023-02-27

"Showing 'under review' for 10 days means it has been submitted for review."

kwak 2023-02-27

February 3rd submission
February 8th Under Review
February 17th Major revision
February 21st resubmission
February 24th Minor revision
February 27th Pending editor decision

JeremyTian 2023-02-26

Excuse me, does anyone know if there are already accepted students who know whether the "Under review" status of this journal means it has been sent for review or is still in the hands of the editor? My paper has been stuck in this status for over 10 days now, and I urgently need it for submission.

JeremyTian 2023-02-26

Hello, may I ask if the "Under review" status of this journal means that it has already been submitted for review or is it still with the editor? My paper has been in this status for over 10 days, and I'm anxiously waiting for it.

oama123 2023-02-23

I have a headache from being rejected for half a year. I can't even remember how many manuscripts have been rejected.