心如草木 向阳而生 2022-06-23

Friend, we are exactly the same.

Chaney 2022-06-21

5.13 Submission
5.17 Under Review
7.7 Major Revision
7.14 Revised
8.14 Accept
Review process took 2 months, revision took 1 month.

good luck 2022-06-17

Excuse me, does anyone know why Wiley sends email reminders for proofreading every few days during the production period after I have finished proofing? Where is the problem?
The email subject is: Reminder: Proof of ADVS.... for Advanced Science ready for review.
When I click on the proofing link, it shows: "This proof can no longer be edited by you. You will only be able to view it."

heergefu 2022-06-15

Follow-up

On May 19th, minor revisions were made. Fortunately, the reviewer also agreed with our viewpoint, so the remaining issues are just some minor formatting problems.
On May 23rd, further revisions were made.
On May 31st, it was accepted.

good luck 2022-06-13

In March, I submitted the manuscript. It took one month for the review process. There were two minor revisions and one major revision. The major revision was related to the computational aspect of my theoretical physics research. They claimed there were issues with the calculations.

The editor seemed willing to accept the manuscript after I provided solutions to more than 20 problems during the ten-day major revision period. I had to conduct additional experiments and improve the calculations before resubmitting.

Both reviewers agreed to accept the manuscript, but the issue with the calculations still remained. We cited examples from Nature and JACS to support our computational approach, but they still disagreed and requested further modifications.

The editor requested minor revisions for the second time, which took four days. We had no choice but to comply with the reviewers' suggestions.

Finally, on May 30th, the manuscript was accepted.

If anyone understands the payment process, please share your knowledge. We transferred the payment to their bank account, but they claim they haven't received it. We have been dealing with payment issues for half a month, and our supervisor is not helping. I am extremely frustrated.

liranran 2022-06-10

投AM，编辑建议转投AS
5.5投递
After more than two weeks, I received some revision suggestions. There were only two minor revisions, and I added some data which I already had. I directly included the revisions and answered the respective five questions.
5.27 submitted the revised version
6.8 directly accepted Overall, it went relatively smoothly. It may not be as good as AM, but I am still very happy with my first job during my doctoral period.
Wishing the journal continued success and an early IF over 20!

1234567898888888888 2022-06-06

2.28 - AM submission
3.18 - Review comments received, one at 5%, one at 15%, one at 50% (evaluated as absurd), editor transferred it to Adv Sci
Filed an appeal in the middle, editor insisted on transferring it
4.22 - Agreed to transfer to Adv Sci, replied to the review comments
5.3 - Second round of comments received (sent back to the original AM reviewers, the first two accepted directly, the third one remained silent when criticized, felt embarrassed and raised an irrelevant issue, editor's opinion was to recommend publication, but also wanted us to respond to the reviewer, so we casually replied to that issue)
5.4 - Returned
5.11 - Accepted
During the process, proofreading and payment of publication fees
6.02 - Online

It took a year to complete this work, and both myself and my boss are satisfied. It's regrettable that it couldn't be published in AM, but this is also common. It's my first doctoral paper, and it's still good.

Wishing everyone encounters nice reviewers and publishes in top journals!

心如草木 向阳而生 2022-05-31

I envy you so much, my friend.

啦啦啦啦 2022-05-30

I have come to fulfill my wish and I hope it will be helpful to everyone.
02.24--03.15: Submitted in the morning, unexpectedly it was sent for review (it had always been under consideration), rejected twice and revised once, the editor (Jos) gave a chance for resubmission (AS, AOM), thanks to the editor.
04.02--04.19: Submitted to AS on 04.02, showed "Under Review" on 04.05, received feedback on 04.19, accepted one and made major revisions (no experiments, mainly changed the introduction), thanks to the reviewers.
04.22--05.03: Submitted on 04.22, showed "Under Review" on 04.28 or 04.29, it had always been "Submitted" before. Received feedback on 05.03, no comments from the reviewers, the editor requested proofreading and additional experimental details.
05.10--05.30: Submitted on 05.10, it had always been in the "Submitted" status, sent a reminder on 05.25 (no reply), accepted on 05.30.
I noticed a pattern that the editor always responds to manuscripts on Tuesdays. Keep going, hope it's helpful.
By the way, thanks to the teacher and classmates.

心如草木 向阳而生 2022-05-28

Already under review for 17 days, still no results, don't know how much longer it will take.

heergefu 2022-05-18

My review comments are very similar to yours. There is a 50% agreement.
It has been over 20 days since I returned, but there is still no news.

Dr.Liu1991 2022-05-17

I just voted too. Is the medical category difficult to get into?

Dr.Liu1991 2022-05-17

I also submitted on May 14th, and the current status is still manuscript submitted. Has yours changed? If it is to be rejected, how many days approximately until we receive news? Please reply if you have any information.

heergefu 2022-05-16

Posted on March 22nd.
Received major revision on April 19th: Three reviewers, one major revision, one minor revision, and one rejection. The rejection reason was due to errors in the theoretical calculations.
Revised on April 27th. The theoretical calculation part was overturned and recalculated, but it doesn't match the experiment as well as before.
It has been close to 20 days, and still no news. I guess it's going to be rejected.

化工陈 2022-05-15

The text is in Chinese and it translates to:

"The submission was made on April 13th, and a few days later it was under review. It has been 32 days now, and there has been no change. Can anyone with experience please tell me how long it usually takes to get the results?"

Bnbn 2022-05-14

Yes, just submitted the manuscript. Is yours too?

心如草木 向阳而生 2022-05-12

Has the submission status of this journal been updated? I saw that it changed to "under review" after "with editor," but I haven't seen "under consideration."

advanced soft materials 2022-05-07

2021.10.10 submission AM
2021.11.10 rejected (one positive, one negative), editor suggested submitting to AS
2021.12.28 revised according to AM's review comments and submitted to AS
2021.1.14 three reviewers (two accept, one minor revision)
2021.1.22 resubmitted
2021.2.6 accepted.
One of the reviewers is the same as the one who rejected the manuscript in the original submission to AM, but their evaluation of the revised manuscript was very positive. It's a pity that they didn't give a chance when it was submitted to AM.

Zhihan666 2022-04-27

The online reputation of this journal is difficult to determine, but overall, it is of good quality. However, I am still concerned about the editorial philosophy of this journal. If it starts to publish excessive supplements and the impact factor rapidly declines, becoming a money-making tool, it would be very frustrating. As a research scientist, one must still maintain one's integrity. Sometimes, the fate of a journal really depends on luck, but valuable work will certainly be recognized.

Zhiyun123 2022-04-19

2022.02.20 submitted in the morning, edited reply the next day, recommended for transfer to Adv.Sci.
2022.02.23 submitted to Adv. Sci.
2022.03.18 two reviewers, one rated it in the top 5%, the other in the top 30%, minor revisions
2022.04.01 submitted revised manuscript
2022.04.05 accepted directly!
Total duration: 40 days, my first PhD paper, very satisfied, thanks to the editor, will continue to work hard.

大好时光 2022-04-18

Editing rejection seems difficult, but you can also give it a try.

大好时光 2022-04-18

Did Xiaoxiu reject it in the end?

littlewu 2022-04-17

This journal has been submitted 4 times, accepted 3 times, and experienced one rejection - major revision - minor revision - minor revision - rejection process. The journal's peer review process is very rigorous, but the submission experience was pleasant. Finally, it was accepted by Carbon. My research focus is on absorbing materials, and I welcome discussions.

Yuanli 2022-04-02

Posted on September 3rd
No notification for review
Received review comments on November 8th, two minor revisions suggested by the editor, major revisions given, 10 days to make changes
Responded with modifications on November 18th
Accepted on November 22nd
Published on December 19th, delayed due to the longer time taken for payment
Overall, except for the longer time taken for review, everything else was quick.

Niuniu_Li 2022-03-28

2022.01.19 AM transfer投
2022.02.11 Major revision (given time from 2.11-3.7 for modifications) with three reviewers, one with a 15% evaluation, one with 50%, and one without any evaluation. 8 questions, supplemented with a few characterization experiments.
2022.03.04 Revised
2022.03.25 Accepted

The speed was relatively slow after the revision, and based on the later acceptance emails, it seems to be due to the reviewers. One of the reviewers took a long time to reply. The defense is scheduled for April 7th, and I am happy to have received the acceptance before the defense.

Serena329 2022-03-25

February 17, 2022: Invested in AEM and transferred on the same day.
March 10, 2022: Major revision with 3 reviewers providing 19 comments. Two reviewers rated it in the top 15% and one in the top 30%. The comments were all very constructive.
March 16, 2022: Reverted back. March 25, 2022: Accepted directly.

Green123 2022-03-25

Of course you can make an appeal. Just reply with your feedback and submit it directly.

123456789123456789 2022-03-23

May I ask how you dealt with it later? I am in the same situation as you, with the same editor.

zxyu. 2022-03-19

My message has also been unanswered for more than 50 days. How long did it take for you to receive the reviewer's comments?

penguin 2022-03-10

It will not be 18. The current impact factor is only 16.1, and it will decrease this year.