guodongbo 2022-10-11

The text has been translated into English as follows:
9.5 AM transferred to AS
9.6 under review
9.21 major revision
10.5 revised manuscript submitted
10.11 accepted
The article was rejected by the editor of AM and suggested to be transferred to AS. Perhaps due to the editor's suggestion, it was reviewed the next day. There were three reviewers, and although there were not many issues, they still gave a 20-day deadline for major revisions.

shirley89 2022-10-10

I want to ask when the OA fee is due for payment? Is it also collected in mid-September, but it is not online yet.

赤子之心去投稿 2022-10-06

Can I add you as a friend to exchange experiences on submitting articles to this journal?

CYnicT 2022-10-06

Submitted on the 30th, still submitted now.

科研痴子 2022-10-05

8.20 manuscript submitted
8.26 under review
9.7 major revision
9.15 manuscript submitted
9.15 accepted
The editor is very nice, and the handling speed of the manuscript is extremely fast. I wish Adv Sci's influence continues to grow (OA journal, a bit expensive).

littlewu 2022-10-05

The text translates to: "The article was rejected by AM and then submitted to AS. Overall, it felt fast, with three reviewers who were quite professional and the questions were not difficult to answer. Thanks to the editorial department, and I hope the journal continues to improve! My research direction is absorptive materials."

33mia 2022-10-03

On August 8th, I transferred my submission to AS, but there has been no decision from the first review until now. Has AS been reviewing submissions slowly recently? I have read about seven or eight previous submissions that were transferred to AS, and they all received quick results from the first review. It has been over a month since my submission went under review. Should I consider reminding the editor about it?

TTSSSSS 2022-09-14

Submitted at the beginning of June, reviewed in approximately one week, and returned for major revisions after two months. Revised version returned in around 20 days and accepted 9 days later. Overall, the editorial department's efficiency is quite high, with all three reviewers pointing out key issues in the article.

GilbertX 2022-09-14

Translate the following text into English: Submitted
June 21, 2022
Final revisions submitted
August 23, 2022
Accepted
September 5, 2022

Submitted
June 21, 2022
Final revisions submitted
August 23, 2022
Accepted
September 5, 2022

rayyyyyy 2022-09-02

4.15 submission, in the hands of the editor for about 10 days, during which it seemed to be with the editor or something, then changed to under review, and waited for about 2 months.
7.5 revision, two reviewers, one minor revision and one major revision, the editor requested major revisions and only gave 10 days. Conducted frantic experiments and made final revisions.
7.15 resubmission, editor sent back to reviewers in about 3 days.
8.4 revision, one directly accepted, one made changes to figure legends and formatting, no additional experiments were conducted.
8.9 resubmission.
8.15 acceptance.
Online two weeks later.
Wishing everyone successful experiments.

菜鸟垃圾 2022-08-30

My status has also remained unchanged. Has yours changed now? I submitted mine on the 22nd.

33mia 2022-08-30

Brother, you're so fast. I also transferred on the 8th of AM, but still haven't received any news.

Qiang Friedrich 2022-08-30

Sent, two positive and one negative edited for submission to Adv Sci.

animalyao 2022-08-29

Has it been submitted for review?

Qiang Friedrich 2022-08-27

Manuscript transferred from Adv Mater
8.8 Manuscript submitted
8.10 with editor
8.14 Under Review
8.26 Completed Accept

The review process was very fast, and the manuscript was accepted without any revisions. Although it is regrettable that it did not get published in Adv Mater, AS is also good.

33mia 2022-08-26

Hello, I would like to ask how long it took for your paper to go from "am" to "under review" after transferring from AM to AS with the editor?

hitlyz 2022-08-25

The first review takes about a month, with major revisions given, and the revision time is 20 days. It's nice that there's no need to conduct additional experiments in the revised content. Then the second review takes one week for acceptance, and the overall speed is relatively fast.

xiaoyuzi 2022-08-25

Never submitted, just expressing opinions. I don't understand why so many people submit to these expensive journals... Do they have nowhere else to spend their money? Why not submit to equivalent level journals like AFM?

ht111 2022-08-23

Still manuscript submitted

33mia 2022-08-23

I have been with editor for 14 days, and I suggest transferring to AS as an editor.

白白丁 2022-08-20

May I ask about the current status? How long until it is reviewed?

slydsc 2022-08-20

May I ask about the current status? How long does it take for the editor to submit it for review?

ht111 2022-08-18

8.16 Manuscript Submitted

lgxu1987 2022-08-10

I have not received the payment details yet.

双色球真刺激 2022-08-09

Is anyone recently processing layout fees? Why is mine 5200 dollars? Did the price increase?

lgxu1987 2022-08-06

First, submit to Angew but it hasn't been sent for review. Then submit to Advanced Science.

2022.04.07 - Submitted
2022.04.14 - Under review
2022.05.23 - Major revision, 2 minor revisions, evaluated in the top 15%, 1 rejection
2022.07.08 - Uploaded revised manuscript
2022.08.01 - Paper accepted
The process is relatively slow, taking 2-3 months overall.

Oh 2022-08-02

Has it been 14 days already with the editor? Is this normal?

3d 2022-07-22

Hello everyone, the article has not been submitted yet. I hope those who have already submitted can provide some answers. Does the journal Advanced Science have any requirements for corresponding authors? Can a PhD candidate serve as the sole corresponding author?

二柱子 2022-07-21

What is the status if the upstairs did not notify the submission for review, is it Manuscript Submitted?

飞跃未来 2022-07-19

I have also read the article. The AS article is not a pure machine learning article. The main focus is on how to obtain methods for single-cell DNA integrity, and then use simple machine learning to describe a pattern or phenomenon. The CB article, on the other hand, feels more like an introduction to the construction of machine learning methods, but uses sperm DNA integrity to validate the methods.