学舟 2023-01-04

11.17 Submission
12.25 Received reviewer comments
12.28 Revised and returned
1.3 Accepted
The reviewer's comments are objective and fair, and the editorial team handles the manuscript quickly. The journal's annual acceptance rate is much lower compared to NC, AM, etc., but the impact factor has been steadily increasing in recent years.

M-Y-F 2023-01-03

Firstly, I am the corresponding author, and secondly, I have been invited to provide comments. I will objectively state my opinions.

PRLKING 2022-12-30

It is estimated that he is not the first author or correspondent, and jealousy is at play.

纳米精灵 2022-12-29

Why do you have to act so arrogant? Look at how proud you are.

学舟 2022-12-28

Why are some people criticizing this journal during the updating period of the Chinese Academy of Sciences' classification? Is the journal dividing someone's cake?

M-Y-F 2022-12-27

2022.10.10 submission to AFM ------ 2022.10.20 rejected (one positive and one negative), editor suggests submitting to AS
2022.10.28 resubmitted to AS after revising according to AFM review comments
2022.11.26 reviewed by three reviewers (1 accepted directly, 2 minor revisions)
2022.12.20 resubmitted ------- 2022.12.25 accepted.
AS journal is overall a recycling journal. As long as the article is not too bad, the editor will persuade you to pay and join. It's not exactly rubbish, but overall it's quite mediocre. I accepted paying for a top journal, but paying for this kind of journal feels quite sleazy, as those in the field understand. For non-top journals, the boss's attitude is generally "if we can avoid submitting, we will", as they are too lazy to make further revisions this time.

PRLKING 2022-12-27

The comments below seem to be from the same person using different aliases. Could it be that AS has taken a toll on their mentality? Or perhaps they are jealous of your rival and feeling annoyed? The articles published by Advanced Science have excellent quality, with a high level of difficulty in being accepted, with an acceptance rate of about 18%. In 2021, its impact factor was 17.5, and it has been publishing over 1000 articles per year since then. As a comprehensive journal with such a large number of publications and a high impact factor, it can only be compared to NC, SA, and PNAS. Although Advanced Science's recognition is currently not as good as the three comprehensive journals mentioned, it is classified as a top-tier journal in Zone 1 of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. You are not qualified to look down on the Chinese Academy of Sciences' classification. Currently, it is one of the evaluation criteria for many research institutions or universities (for those who disagree, if you have the ability, can you come up with an evaluation criterion that others can use?!).

mimi111 2022-12-27

Hmm... Although the reputation of this journal is a bit... well, the boss doesn't allow us to submit to it. They say it's a money-making journal, and having too many of those affects our reputation. But we have no choice since students need to graduate. Besides, the impact factor is still decent, so we can only organize the past data.

期刊试金石 2022-12-26

Overall, AS mainly focuses on articles by graduating students. It deserves no more than one star. The impact factor has increased slightly with Adv., but the journal's overall quality is still inferior to JMCA. To put it plainly, as long as the article is close in quality to JMCA or ACS AMI, money can secure publication. It's obvious that the journal was established to make money, following Wiley's usual tactics. If the country wants to revitalize domestic journals, it should mainly suppress such money-making journals, even if we need to establish our own money-making journal!! I can confidently assert that this journal will eventually decline. Of course, at that time, foreign countries will launch another type of journal and aggressively promote it to further make money, never getting tired of it. Therefore, the Chinese Academy of Sciences should intervene and put an end to this trend.

林夕 2022-12-24

The reputation is already so bad. It's not too much to say that you can get published by paying. Graduates who are in a hurry to graduate from the laboratory can usually write a paper just to meet the requirements. Almost all of them are Chinese people engaging in spamming, which indeed conforms to the distribution standards of the first zone of the Chinese Academy of Sciences!

方建 2022-12-22

The laboratory practically had one article per person starting from the second year of research. It was a famous magazine for spam and garbage disposal. Surprisingly, 70% of the articles were written by Chinese Americans. Such a well-known magazine targeting Chinese people turned out to be in the first district. The Chinese Academy of Sciences has quite a discerning taste!

wangkeke 2022-12-16

December 16th, accept

梦回天明 2022-12-15

Reply [Mao Mao's]
There's no need to worry, it's normal for the review to take up to two weeks.

毛毛家的 2022-12-15

May I ask if "12-7" means the status of "manuscript submitted"? It's still the same on "12-15", should I send an email to remind them? Good luck to you.

梦回天明 2022-12-13

Because of experimental issues, the submission of the rework results was delayed for three weeks. Resubmit on 12.12.

Easonliu 2022-12-09

2022.6.9 submit
2022.6.13 with editor
2022.6.17 under review
2022.8.12 reject
Normally, the review process takes about a month. However, in July, there was a summer holiday which caused a delay of one month. There were two reviewers: one ranked in the top 5%, while the other mentioned a lack of innovation, ranking in the top 50%.
2022.8.17 argue
2022.8.27 reply, can resubmit
2022.10.23 resubmit
2022.11.23 minor revise
2022.11.30 accept

liuweishuai 2022-12-09

2022.6.9 Submission. The review will be conducted approximately three working days later, and it will take around one month for the rejection. One expert mentioned a lack of innovation.

wangkeke 2022-12-07

December 7th, under review.

Asianwi 2022-12-01

20221101 manuscript submitted
20221107 with editor
20221110 under review

wangkeke 2022-11-25

October 13th, submitted
October 18th, under review
November 10th, major revision
November 24th, submitted
Waiting

皮皮水 2022-11-12

9.26 manuscript submitted
10.5 under review

ht111 2022-11-10

8.16 Manuscript submitted
9.20. Major revision
10.15 Revised manuscript submitted
11.08 Minor revision
11.09 Revised manuscript submitted
11.10 Accepted

twilight_lml 2022-11-07

Submitted, wishing you good luck.

nsc2022 2022-11-03

25th October post, still submitted until now.

兔吐斯基 2022-10-31

8.4 submitted
8.13 under review
9.7 major revision, two reviewers, each with 6-8 questions
9.29 manuscript submitted, revised after adding some experiments
10.17 minor revision
10.21 final revisions submitted, accepted on the same day

梦回天明 2022-10-26

10.24 Major revision
Two reviewers, each with five questions, require additional small experiments to be conducted.

ray1 2022-10-22

Did you submit AFM for review?

mimi111 2022-10-20

AFM rejected, it is recommended to brick AS, and it is accepted after modification.

梦回天明 2022-10-19

There is currently no news yet. How long does it usually take for the first review of this publication?

zjrzjrzjr 2022-10-18

May I ask how long you have been in the "manuscript submitted" status? I have been waiting for five days and it is still in this status.