marcusyang 2023-06-09

It should have been sent. When I submitted it at that time, if it wasn't for review, it would have come back in about two days.

marcusyang 2023-06-09

September mid-submission, early March major revision, returned for revision in early May after two months of changes, directly accepted in early June.
I felt that there weren't many comments given during the major revision at that time, and it seemed that the opinions of the reviewers were also inclined towards acceptance. It was directly accepted after the major revision was completed.

hjthope 2023-06-07

How long did it take for you to go from "under review" to "awaiting decision"? I thought JBHI usually sends papers for external review and rarely desk rejects.

changjoey 2023-06-07

Reviewing takes at least a few months, so this probably means it has been rejected directly.

changjoey 2023-06-07

Most likely...

小苹果ll 2023-06-07

I would like to ask everyone, after "under review," does "awaiting decision" mean the paper will be rejected? (crying)

hjthope 2023-06-06

It has been two weeks since the submission, and the old system shows that it is still in the Admin Office. In the new system, it is indicated as "UR" in capital letters. Does this mean it has not been sent for external review yet?

一之濑夜 2023-06-04

There is indeed a difference in capitalization, but I feel that the old system is more accurate. With the new system, it feels like once you submit it, it remains in an "under review" state until a decision is received.

hjthope 2023-06-03

In the old system, it shows "Under review," and in the new system, it also shows "Under Review." Is this what you mean by capitalization? However, the display in both systems is different, which is strange!

hjthope 2023-06-03

I would like to ask, is "under review" displayed in both the new and old systems for these 6 months? Is there any difference in capitalization?

芒果 2023-06-02

It's been 6 and a half months and still no first trial result. I emailed the editor two weeks ago and there has been no reply until now.

一之濑夜 2023-05-30

There are a few reviewers who cannot be seen, and I remember they will always be "Under Review". Generally, it takes about two weeks for the status to be "Under Review", and the probability of being sent for review is quite high. Someone previously said that if "Under Review" is in uppercase, it means it is sent for external review. However, I once submitted a manuscript and it went through the uppercase "Under Review" status, but the associate editor rejected it as "out of scope" without sending it for external review.

hjthope 2023-05-30

I found it. I had been looking in the wrong place all along! May I also ask you how many reviewers can be seen on the system? And will there be any changes in the status displayed after sending it for external review, or will it always be "ur"?

一之濑夜 2023-05-30

For the old system, I used the journal submission website address on LetPub to submit. After entering, you should be able to see the submission status under the "author" section. Of course, I'm not sure if you can see it for non-communication submissions. Since my previous focus was more on physics, I didn't submit to the IEEE series very often. The only time I had an experience with a non-communication submission, I was able to check the submission status.

hjthope 2023-05-29

I also submitted using the new system, may I ask how to see the submission status in the old system? Can I see it even if I am not a communication personnel?

white1503 2023-05-28

You can pay attention to the Scholar One system. In the new system, it is still under review (UR), while in the old system, it is already awaiting decision.

一之濑夜 2023-05-25

2022-12-02 submission
2022-12-02 under review
2023-02-18 major revision
2023-04-29 revision submitted
2023-05-19 awaiting recommendation
2023-05-25 accept

As my first submission to JBHI as a corresponding author, I used the new system which does not provide specific details. For example, I had no idea when the manuscript was sent for external review after December 2nd last year. On May 19th, I found the status "awaiting recommendation" in the old system. The new system is convenient for submission, but the old system is better for checking the status.

However, JBHI's impact factor has been consistently increasing, and it is expected to reach around 7.8 this year, firmly placing it in the top quartile. Its reputation is also comparable to journals like Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (TBE), possibly slightly lower. Overall, it is still worth investing in.

小苹果ll 2023-05-22

I submitted it on April 3rd and still haven't received any news. How long does it usually take for a review?

stockholm7229 2023-05-22

It has already been submitted for review, it was sent around April 21st, so I said the editorial department's review would take about 2-3 days, based on others' experience, at most a week.

white1503 2023-05-22

Does the preliminary review stage refer to being still in the editorial department or has it already been submitted for review?

stockholm7229 2023-05-22

I submitted on April 18th and sent an email to the editorial department on May 16th. They replied saying that it is currently in the initial review stage, and the editorial department's review time is approximately 2-3 days. There seems to be a slight issue with the display on the author portal.

小苹果ll 2023-05-20

I also want to ask, do you want to communicate?

white1503 2023-05-15

May I ask how to determine if it is in the admin office? It seems that only the author portal can show that the status is UR.

YCZ 2023-05-15

A special issue was submitted at the end of last year. It has been seven months, and I have sent two emails to the editor, but there has been no response at all.

white1503 2023-05-15

It has been under review for over a month. May I know if it has been submitted for review?

小苹果ll 2023-05-06

Being in the Admin Office for more than a month, the status is still "under review." Does this mean it has not been submitted for approval yet?

hackbuteer 2023-05-04

May I ask if the original poster has any updates? It's been quite slow. I haven't received any updates on my end.

lily0118 2023-05-04

What's happening with the resubmission for review after 8 days? Has anyone experienced this situation before? There are three reviewers, and it is currently in the second round of reviewing.

系阿伟唉 2023-04-20

The speed is relatively fast, usually taking about 2 months to get results. However, it is not recommended to invest in small field directions. For the past two years, our research group has had multiple articles in the field of epileptic seizures in brainwaves inexplicably rejected. They always prefer four reviewers, but most of their opinions are only superficially knowledgeable. The other reviewers "expose their true nature" as soon as they start speaking. To summarize the review process of these articles: the first three reviewers' opinions are positive, but the fourth reviewer directly rejects them.

xiaolanshu 2023-04-11

Recently, the review process has been really slow. I don't know what's going on with the journal.