Yin Zheng 2022-11-11

Two weeks after submission, the review comments were received. There were two reviewers, each raising four questions. The acceptance was received one week after the response. It went quite smoothly.

ping7799 2022-11-08

It has been five days since submission, but it has not reached the editor yet.

bicsma 2022-11-02

The current system of Wiley only shows "With Editor" after the editing process. The waiting time can range from a few days to over ten days. Once it is submitted for review, it will be displayed as "Under Review".

科研老王 2022-10-30

Hello, I would like to ask if it is normal for the status to remain as "submitted" after you submit, and then the next status is "revise"? Are there any stages such as "with editor" or "under review"?

科研老王 2022-10-30

For 8 days, the status of my submission has been "manuscript submitted". It has been very slow and also very anxious.

使命轮回 2022-10-01

8.31 Submission
9.2 Under Review
9.13 Feedback Received, Major Revision
9.23 Submitted Revised Manuscript in the Morning, Under Review in the Afternoon
9.26 Feedback Received, Minor Revision
9.28 Revised
9.30 Accepted for Publication by the Editor

The efficiency of both the editor and the reviewers is extremely high. The reviewers are industry experts and very professional. The editor is very nice and processes everything very quickly. I genuinely hope that this journal continues to improve and succeed.

音轨 2022-09-29

I submitted a review article, which is generally more difficult than a research paper. This time, I blindly submitted without writing a cover letter. The review process was relatively fast, with a total of three reviewers. The feedback provided was very professional, specific, and even sharp. I am very grateful for the reviewers' suggestions as they allowed me to view and improve my work from different perspectives. After major and minor revisions, it took more than two months, which I consider to be relatively fast. I think the quality of this journal's articles is quite good, and the research reports are done diligently, giving a solid feeling.

Additionally, I want to mention that I couldn't find the endnote output style for AOM on their official website. I had to manually edit the reference format based on my observation. I don't know if the official website will provide it in the future. It's a bit troublesome to handle this.

小石头12345 2022-08-08

A pretty good journal. I have submitted three articles to it during my doctoral studies, and one of them was accepted. Considering my field, the articles in this journal are not inferior to top engineering journals.

111111234 2022-07-26

After being rejected by AFM for review, I decided to submit to AOM as advised by the editor. I agreed to the transfer and carefully responded to the review comments from AFM. After the review process, my paper was directly accepted for publication.

111111234 2022-06-25

I am also suggesting to switch from AFM to AOM. I would like to ask if it is better to agree on the switch first and then make modifications based on the opinions, or to make modifications first and then switch.

qwertykkk 2022-04-25

submitted: 01 Mar 2022
decision: 20 Mar 2022 (Revise)
re-submitted: 11 April 2022
accept: 19 Apr 2022

Translation:

submitted: 01 Mar 2022
decision: 20 Mar 2022 (Revise)
re-submitted: 11 April 2022
accept: 19 Apr 2022

Zzzzz123 2022-03-16

2021 12 22 Submission
2022 1 24 Received review comments Rejection

谁曾是你这一首歌 2022-02-23

The efficiency is very high, and the speed of review exceeded my imagination. It is very professional. The questions from the three reviewers are all very profound, indicating that they are experts in the field. The fact that it has only been in publication for 10 years and has reached this level of development without publishing a review article can be said to be quite remarkable. I have high expectations! Good articles are usually accepted quickly, making it suitable for those who are short on time.

112B 2021-12-04

This Runcheng friend probably has never submitted to this journal before. If they have and still come to criticize this journal, I find it unbelievable. It's likely their first time submitting or they got rejected and now they are venting. The reviewers of this journal are very professional. It is categorized as a level 2 comprehensive journal because it is not very comprehensive itself, but the Optical category is level 1 and they are all top journals. I don't know what mistake they made to provoke such criticism from you. Moreover, the quality of AOM's journals is still acceptable. It may not compare to NP and similar journals, but in terms of optical quality alone, is there a difference compared to AFM and AM?

garf 2021-10-31

The optical major is in District 1, bro.

谁曾是你这一首歌 2021-09-19

How long does it take to review, bro? It has been twelve days and still no news.

仲卿 2021-09-16

The reviewer is extremely professional and rigorous, and their assistance with the article is particularly significant. I hope to publish more articles in AOM in the future and support the emerging optical journal.

润成 2021-08-19

Garbage journal, the second-rate journal is well-deserved, most of the article quality is supported by higher authorities, lacking in substantial content. It cannot be compared to ACS Photo in any way. In the future, I will not submit my research on domestic photo to this journal, and of course, I will not cite the articles published in it either.

laokeyan 2021-07-30

The first trial was completed in less than 40 days with minor adjustments.

xiongzuping 2021-07-15

The article has been submitted for a month, and there is no news at all...

陌上蔷薇 2021-06-22

2021-4-12 Submission;
2021-5-6 Major revision, a total of 20 questions, no need for additional experiments. 2 suggestions for acceptance, one pointed out minor issues, the other may be a rejection, with 1 month given to make revisions;
2021-5-24 Revised;
2021-5-30 The first reviewer showed great interest and provided 3 more improvement-related minor questions;
2021-6-2 Revised;
2021-6-3 Accepted.
The work was focused on structural color direction, overall the submission to AOM felt good, fast, and the reviewers were professional. Why was it assigned to the second-tier? It feels frustrating.

MWH 2021-03-22

The second article submitted by AFM has been accepted. The reviewer provided VIP status but still asked some questions. After revising the manuscript, it was accepted for publication.

Mott 2021-01-12

2019.09.27 Submission
2019.11.18 Major revision
2019.12.04 Revision submission
Due to Christmas, one reviewer did not review, so the editor found another one
2019.12.31 Major revision
2020.01.18 Revision submission
2020.03.02 Minor revision
2020.03.06 Revision submission
2020.03.09 Acceptance
2020.03.15 Proofreading
It took a long time with three rounds of revisions. It can be considered as a good outcome. The reviewer's comments were very helpful. I hope the journal will continue to improve! I hope to have the opportunity to publish an article in it in the future.