然然 2021-06-17

What does NSP mean?

买囊的艾力 2021-06-11

Hello, I would like to ask, how should we indicate that two authors contributed equally to the paper in the journal "water"? Is it appropriate to add "A and B contributed equally to the paper" in the beginning of the author section? Also, should we include email addresses for authors who contributed equally? And should the two authors who contributed equally be listed as the first and second authors in the author section?

hzaucp 2021-06-10

666666 in English is "six hundred sixty-six thousand six hundred sixty-six."

wail 2021-05-22

Hello, I would like to ask about the status of my submission on the manuscript system. It has been around ten days, and it shows "Under review." I read online that this is still the initial review stage, and "Under review" refers to the external review stage. Is this also the case for the Water journal? Is my submission still in the initial review stage?

Tracyie 2021-04-28

I used LetPub's editing service and did not have any language or writing-related issues. My supervisor also believed that the quality of the edited article had been improved. The review comments were quickly returned within a month, and the post-submission service fee was also crucial. The response email was six pages long and received very careful revisions. The article has now been accepted. I am very grateful to LetPub for editing my article!

xianwei822 2021-04-24

WeChat ID: xianwei985, please add me, thank you! Waiting online.

xianwei822 2021-04-24

Hello, can I have your WeChat contact? I submitted a water-related article, but it didn't pass the technical review. I'm seeking your help.

resercher 2021-04-23

3.15 Submission
4.2 Major revision
4.5 Revised
4.12 Minor revision
4.15 Revised
4.17 Minor revision
4.18 Revised
4.20 Accepted
4.22 Online

There were a total of three reviewers, with the first reviewer suggesting two minor revisions and one major revision. Only the reviewer for the major revision was sent the revised version, while the minor revisions were not sent. The reviewer for the major revision also agreed to accept the paper. Then, it went to the academic editor, who commented, "but these reviews were, in my opinion, quite superficial." This comment made me feel like the paper was doomed. However, the editor personally reviewed the paper and made meticulous changes, feeling like more than 50% of the content was altered. He raised many crucial questions. On a side note, I replied with a 20-page cover letter. The academic editor was particularly satisfied and said, "I have also learned a lot from your response." Only then did I finally relax my worried mind. Dealing with such a strict academic editor, I can only say I am exhausted.

原地起飞 2021-04-11

Boss, you're too fast with this. I want to consult you for your experience in submitting to this journal, willing to pay.

原地起飞 2021-04-11

What are you afraid of? It's not on the warning list. I really don't know which journal I should submit to in order to give this academic loser hope of graduating. Brother, I am about to submit, do you have any experience to share? Willing to pay for it.

Yiki 2021-04-09

Overall, it was very fast. There were three reviewers in total. In the first round, there were two major revisions and one minor revision. In the second round, there were two minor revisions and one acceptance. In the third round, there was only one suggestion, and once it was revised, it was accepted.

They gave me 10 days to make revisions in the first round. I delayed a bit during the Spring Festival, but if it had been fast, one and a half months would have been enough.

Received Date: 2021.1.24
Revised Date: 2021.3.17
Accepted Date: 2021.3.26
Published Date: 2021.3.29

桃谷小仙 2021-04-08

Posted on March 8th: water
Status changed to "under review" on the same day.
Major revision on March 23rd.
Returned manuscript on March 31st.
Minor revision on April 6th.
Returned manuscript on April 7th.
Accepted on April 8th.
From submission to acceptance, exactly one month.
The journal's review process is fast and efficient, and the reviewers' questions are very accurate.

yingzi1989000 2021-03-29

I wonder if this journal requires a page fee? Approximately how much?

resercher 2021-03-11

Isn't this journal edited domestically? Why am I assigned a Romanian editor?

hydrology 2021-03-09

Are you still investing? It's already on the warning list. Are you really not afraid?

永不止步 2021-03-09

2021.2.2 submission
2021.2.3 under review
2021.2.22 pending minor revisions
2021.2.26 resubmitted
2021.3.5 paper accepted
2021.3.5 pending English
2021.3.6 author-proofreading
2021.3.8 resubmitted
2021.3.×× online

Translation:
2021.2.2 submission
2021.2.3 under review
2021.2.22 pending minor revisions
2021.2.26 resubmitted
2021.3.5 paper accepted
2021.3.5 pending English
2021.3.6 author-proofreading
2021.3.8 resubmitted
2021.3.×× online

如果我会法术~ 2021-01-13

Fast;
Posted on December 18th;
Received on January 8th.

无昵称的人呢 2021-01-10

Entered the warning list, if you still want to work in scientific research in the future, the risk is extremely high.

啊嘟嘟嘟 2021-01-10

If you have a master's degree, you can request a revision, but be cautious. It is advised not to submit papers to journals listed in the "International Journal Warning List" for doctoral candidates. I have asked many people, and they all suggest that I withdraw the external review.

Kai 2021-01-08

About three weeks after the investment, a major revision was given.
Initially, there were two reviewers and their comments were quite general, so it was easy to respond to them. After two days, two additional reviewers were added. The last reviewer provided more opinions and seemed to have experience in this field. They provided a total of 9 references for reference, but I found that most of the research focused on different issues, so I am hesitant to cite them.
Please give me some advice as the deadline for submission is in two days.

啊嘟嘟嘟 2021-01-07

The review process feels quite fast. I just submitted an article before New Year's Day, but unfortunately, it was put on the warning list by the journal. It's a bit disheartening. I'm thinking of withdrawing the submission. Should I directly send an email to the editor or should I pretend to be unaware until the external review comments come back? I would appreciate any advice from everyone.