ganggang 2022-04-15

The text is already in English and does not require translation.

zszszszs 2022-04-11

3.12 submission
3.12-3.14 pending review
3.14-4.4 under review
4.4-4.8 pending major revision
4.8 resubmission
4.8-4.8 revised version review
4.8-4.11 pending editor decision
4.11 accept
Soon.

怎可忘初心 2022-04-09

2022.2.26 Submission
2022.2.28 Review
2022.3.25 Major revision (2 direct rejections, one major revision. This article has been submitted to 7 journals, revised 4 times, and ultimately only accepted based on financial capability.)
2022.3.28 Revision requested
2022.4.2 Accepted
Payment required, online directly.
Fast process, not very high content requirements, a good choice for graduation. If you have the money, you can give it a try, 15,000 RMB.

bcimba 2022-03-31

Received Date: 1 March 2022
Revised Date: 24 March 2022
Accepted Date: 29 March 2022
Published Date: 30 March 2022

pingpangplayer 2022-03-28

How long does it usually take to get results after pending review?

xander 2022-03-28

Fast speed, suitable for the need to publish articles within a short period of time.

曾垂成 2022-03-27

May I ask if I submitted it on March 4th, and it has been under review since the 7th until now, should I send an email to inquire with the editor?

adrian1993 2022-03-17

On the second day, it was already under review.

ganggang 2022-03-17

How long has your pending review been?

ganggang 2022-03-17

How long is the average pending review time for this?

adrian1993 2022-03-13

received date: 20 February 2022
minor revised date: 8 March 2022
accepted date: 11 March 2022

rainyery 2022-02-16

Received Date: 19 January 2022
Revised Date: 11 February 2022
Accepted Date: 12 February 2022
Published Date: 15 February 2022

winnielee 2022-02-11

2022.1.18 with editor
2022.1.31 major revision
2022.2.9 minor revision
2022.2.11 acceptance

The article is generally innovative, using methods from managerial economics. Therefore, based on the recommendation of the external reviewers, the editor sent it to experts in econometrics for review. They provided many valuable suggestions, and it is evident that the article has become much richer in theory without changing the methods used for calculations.

Another external reviewer made very detailed revisions and provided me with numerous references to study (not for citation, but purely for knowledge dissemination. Thank you).

This article was submitted to two second-tier journals in 2021 and was rejected after review both times. One of the rejections was even arbitrated by the editor. It is regrettable that it was still rejected (still grateful to JCP for providing constructive revision suggestions).

With graduation approaching and limited time, publishing in Water is still the most cost-effective option. It is a JCR2-Q3 journal with a citescore of 3.7.

This is the second article published on Water, and it is also my first article that I have put all my efforts into.

Dengsir 2022-02-02

Can this journal be classified as Civil Engineering and Geotechnical Engineering?

Dengsir 2022-02-02

Hello, may I ask if this journal can be classified as civil engineering?

Dengsir 2022-02-01

Hello, can this journal be classified under our civil engineering category?

陈鸭鸭 2022-01-30

How many days does it take for "pending review" to be under review? Has anyone in the same industry been rejected in the preliminary review?

YUNNAN 2022-01-03

Because the recommended references from the reviewers were not included, the revised submission was rejected outright. It is suggested to resubmit the paper after adding the references, and it will be accepted without further review. Please consider this carefully.

阿阮软软 2021-12-22

Microsoft Word templates can be found on the author instructions page of various journals.

LU000 2021-11-17

Hello, sorry to bother you, but I would like to ask about the formatting requirements for this journal and where to find the submission website. Thank you!

LU000 2021-11-17

Hello, recently I wanted to submit a paper to Water. May I ask where I can find the formatting requirements for this journal? Also, what is the submission website? Thank you so much for your help!

CruiseLIU 2021-11-16

8-16 submission
9-21 major revisions
10-5 minor revisions
10-8 accepted for publication
10-12 online
The process was fast, and the editors were responsible. As long as the reviewers do not delay, the publication process is efficient.

阿阮软软 2021-11-15

Post to online for a full two months.

无人原样而还 2021-11-13

Garbage journal. The first time I submitted it, my cross-references were messed up and I could still send it to the reviewers. The two reviewers couldn't see the figure numbers, all they saw were missing citations. How can such a large number of missing citations not be visible? Editor, take a look. Asked to resubmit, wasted a month. After resubmission, added another reviewer. A month later, received feedback, reviewer 2 agreed to accept, reviewer 1 asked for detailed information on PIV, and reviewer 3 asked to change the introduction. Ten days given for revision. After revising, received second review results in five days, reviewer 3 changed the language, reviewer 1 said my PIV processing method was incorrect, the processing window was too large, not meeting the quarter rule, but this rule only limits the minimum processing window and does not limit the maximum. Presented evidence to prove that strictly following the rule does not yield good processing results. Someone cited a larger processing window in their references, resulting in reduced error. Five days given, still asked to revise the language. Their language editing service takes a standard 5 days, or 1 day for urgent cases. It has been 5 days since I submitted my feedback, sent an email one day in advance asking if the editor could extend the deadline, but no reply. On the last day, I could only submit the revised version. Resulted in rejection after almost a month of delay, the reason for rejection was agreeing with reviewer 1's feedback, but the latest feedback from reviewer 1 was not even in the system. No modification suggestions were made to the main body of the article from beginning to end, the reviewers were half-hearted, and the editor was even worse, clearly because I didn't request urgent language editing. Garbage journal, I hope you get kicked out of SCI soon.

orchid 2021-10-13

Excuse me, will this journal still be as quick if it does not recommend reviewers on its own?

毛小驴哥 2021-10-06

Everyone says that this journal is too low-quality, and when you translate the name of this journal, it becomes "Water Journal." But it doesn't really mean that it is bad. I feel that the articles still have quality, it's just that everyone feels that MDPI journal is low-quality, and this impression has been created. It has a high impact factor of 3.1, which is good, and the review process is fast. This aspect is commendable. For those who need articles, it is still worth it. As for whether it is worth it or not, it is still up to individual judgment.

Song Zhenyu 2021-09-10

May I ask why the submission has been pending review for 3 days and when will it be under review?

33爱科研 2021-09-09

How long does it take to retrieve after being hired?

badminton 2021-07-03

6-13 Submission;
6-27 Minor revision;
7-1 Resubmission;
7-2 Acceptance;
7-3 Publication.
Price: 14000 RMB.

榆䘵桥舍 2021-06-30

It's fast! Submitted on May 15th and published online on June 30th.