SunJianFeng 2022-07-26

Special issues will be faster.

xinbao 2022-07-26

Below is the entire submission process:

3.10 submit
3.11 under review
3.30 pending decision
3.31 Declined for Publication - Encourage Resubmission after Revisions
5.12 revision finished
5.13 resubmitted
6.25 pending decision
7.1 pending major revisions
7.5 English pre-editing
7.6 Resubmitted, Revised version review
7.13 Pending minor revisions
7.14 Resubmitted, Revised version review, Pending editor decision
7.22 Paper received
7.25 Website online

xinbao 2022-07-26

RS impact factor 5.349, SCI Q2. The journal's submission cycle is about two months, and the reviewers reply quickly with constructive feedback. It is important to carefully revise and respond to the reviewers' comments, which significantly improves the manuscript quality. The waiting process during this period is nerve-wracking, and I have visited Letpub numerous times to check everyone's progress, constantly motivating myself. Effort may not always yield results, but not putting in effort will definitely lead to nothing. Finally, I hope everyone can persist with their previous all-out efforts and I wish every Ph.D. student success in their academic journey!

何须精锐 2022-07-19

The review process took one month, and the comments from the three reviewers were quite constructive. After revising, the article was accepted directly! Another reason might be that this article had been submitted to multiple journals before, accumulating a lot of feedback from reviewers in the early stages. Overall, I felt good about it. My submission logic was for Science of the Total Environment (STOTEN), Journal of Geophysical Research (JGR), and Remote Sensing (RS).

HXD3G0002 2022-07-18

Received Date: 18 May 2022
Revised Date: 15 June 2022
Accepted Date: 5 July 2022
Published Date: July 2022

The speed is really fast. The day after submission, it was sent for review. There were four rounds of revisions, three minor and one major. The feedback provided was very serious, and the modifications greatly improved the article. After the first review, I was in the field and requested an extension, which was granted for one week. After the revisions were submitted, the second review had fewer comments, mainly focusing on the areas that were not thoroughly modified in the first review. The waiting time afterwards was relatively long. I was notified to receive the final proofreading, which had a three-day deadline. After being notified to make the payment, the article was published immediately after the revisions were paid for. Overall, the peer review and editing process felt very responsible, and the editor-in-chief also took the selection of manuscripts seriously. However, the time given for revisions was extremely tight, with almost no breathing room, especially when experts suggested major revisions. In conclusion, it was a relatively smooth submission, and the process was enjoyable. The journal indeed has high efficiency, with the impact factor reaching 5 in 2021, and it is likely to be not much lower this year. In any case, OA journals can effectively disseminate research findings, although the page charges are quite expensive...

liyuti 2022-07-17

2022.06.06 Submitted
2022.06.07 Under review
2022.06.29 Review comments can be seen in the system
2022.06.30 Major revision, three reviewers in total, two positive comments, the third reviewer's comments are acceptable, requesting additional simulation and giving ten days for revisions.
2022.07.10 Revised
2022.07.14 Able to see the comments from the third reviewer, all "yes," probably only sent to the third reviewer
2022.07.15 Accepted
Overall, the process was fast, and the experience was good.

Mutes 2022-07-17

It feels like if this publication is not under review for more than 1 day, it's probably not going to be accepted. It could be due to issues with the research direction, and not many suggestions were provided.

MC1016 2022-07-16

Brother, what is your current status? Are you still waiting for assignment on the second day as well?

Mutes 2022-07-14

2022.07.12 Submitted
2022.07.14 Pending review
It is still pending review as of now, and I don't know the situation. Is there anyone knowledgeable who can help me answer?

qilintong 2022-07-13

I gave up and replied to the email recommending that I switch to a special edition. Has anyone encountered this situation before?

be positive！ 2022-07-09

Good luck, the review speed of RS is really fast, and it was a very smooth and comfortable submission. Here is a timeline:

2022.05.20 - Submitted, assigned editor on the same day
2022.06.08 - Major revision comments returned, three reviewers' opinions. Two reviewers felt that further significant changes were needed, while one was satisfied and only provided minor suggestions.
2022.06.13 - Revised manuscript returned for modifications (I made the changes relatively quickly, and the deadline was supposed to be until 6.18)
2022.06.21 - Acceptance confirmed~

颖崔思汀 2022-07-06

How can we know the reason for this?

morience 2022-07-06

Excuse me, do you have the result now?

ssssdwqdqew 2022-07-06

2022.06.24 pending review - Editor assigned on the same day
2022.06.25 under review
2022.07.06 awaiting news
Regarding remote sensing imagery, there will be updates if there is any progress.

tutuwei 2022-07-05

I am also, the header, footer, acknowledgments, and fund support, all duplicated. Can I ask how you did it?

Amos 2022-07-05

How is the current situation now? I also haven't received any news for three days.

蝎子莱莱11 2022-07-02

1. Submitted on March 16th, pending decision in the column.
2. Two hours after submission on March 16th, it changed to under review.
3. On March 31st, the editor sent an email saying they couldn't find reviewers and requested recommendations.
4. On April 4th, three reviewers were found.
5. Major revision requested on April 20th, with a requirement to return within ten days.
6. Revised on May 5th.
7. Pending editor decision on May 13th.
8. Encouraged resubmission after revisions on May 17th, rejected for resubmission.
9. On May 30th, the editor reminded and inquired about the progress of the modifications.
10. On June 14th, the editor reminded again, but no changes were made.
11. Revised on June 16th, submitted for review on the same day with the same reviewers.
12. Major revision requested on June 27th, only grammar issues.
13. Proofread and revised on July 1st, accepted in the afternoon, probably not shown to the reviewers.

For specific content and considerations, please refer to the link: https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/536530114

ssssdwqdqew 2022-07-01

How many of your repetitions were rejected in total?

血公子 2022-07-01

Why is the plagiarism checker checking the repetition rate and formatting of the headers and footers in my manuscript? And why are the subsequent statements being highlighted in red as well?

cccheny 2022-06-29

2022.6.7 submit - Submitted on June 7th, 2022.
6.8 pending review - Under review since June 8th.
6.21 pending minor revisions - Awaiting minor revisions since June 21st.
6.25 resubmitted - Resubmitted on June 25th.
6.26 paper accepted - Paper has been accepted on June 26th.
6.28 pending English - Currently being reviewed for English language proficiency since June 28th.

tutuwei 2022-06-29

Mm-hmm, okay, thank you for your reply.

wkr05 2022-06-28

Yes, I only reviewed a total of 11 pages at first, then added major revisions to make it 18 pages, and finally sent the final draft of 17 pages.

tutuwei 2022-06-25

May I ask if the manuscript requires 18 pages, including the references? Is it acceptable to have 17 pages without the references and 19 pages with the references?

SunJianFeng 2022-06-25

Remote sensing is fast. I conducted the external audit on the same day. Have you been assigned an assistant editor?

JaneJ_ 2022-06-24

It has been a month under review, and I haven't received any feedback. I'm getting a little anxious.

LLLHW 2022-06-24

The post has been in "Pending review" status since June 21st, so it's probably been sent.

PPAP 2022-06-22

I have submitted it for three days, but there has been no response at all. It is still pending review. According to the usual practice, this journal has a fast review process. It might be because the journal is currently in high demand. I wish the journal continued success and hope everyone's papers get accepted soon.

movee 2022-06-22

Try to submit to specialized journals, as the chances of acceptance are higher. After submission, it is difficult to be rejected if you make modifications based on the opinions of the editor and reviewers. It is suitable to publish one article in this kind of journal as a commemoration, but continuously submitting may not be ideal.

LLLHW 2022-06-22

May I ask what is the current result now?

天空之城1118 2022-06-17

Just now, I made a mistake.